• Categories

  • The Golden Rule

    “That which is hateful to you do not do to another ... the rest (of the Torah) is all commentary, now go study.”

    - Rabbi Hillel

  • Subscribe

  • Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Remember to click "manage" to set your preferences, such as daily and the time of delivery. Thanks!

  • Note

    The huge blue banner ads on the videos are placed there by Wordpress.com, not Dandelion Salad.
  • Lists of posts and videos


    List of all posts

    List of all videos

    Feedburner listing the last 25 posts

    Blogroll

    Open Forum for Dandelion Salad
    (Discussion, comments, whatever you'd like to write about.)

    Don’t Enlist, But Don’t Just Take My Word For It by Lo
    Please pass this on to anyone you know who may be considering enlisting as a soldier (mercenary).

  • Don’t forget to check out more videos on Dandelion Salad’s Lockerz

  • Amendment I

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
  • Disclaimer:

    The views and/or opinions posted on all the blog posts and in the comment sections are of their respective authors, not necessarily those of Dandelion Salad.

    All content has been used with permission from the copyright owners, who reserve all rights, and that for uses outside of fair use (an excerpt), permission must be obtained from the respective copyright owner.

  • Activism – Protests – Boycotts

    Activism Protests Boycotts

    "But remember, this power of the people on top depends on the obedience of the people below. When people stop obeying, they have no power." -- Howard Zinn

  • Socialism

    Socialism on Dandelion Salad
  • Meet the new boss the same as the old boss

    Obama = Bush
  • Food

    Food On Dandelion Salad
  • Global Warming

    Drought
  • US Deaths in Afghanistan: Obama vs Bush. Click here to learn more.
  • Obama’s Wars

    President Obama: Stop the Wars!

    Afghanistan

    Iraq

    Somalia

    Uganda

    Yemen

    Economic Warfare: Sanctions-Embargos

    Cuba

    Iran

    North Korea

  • RSS My Utmost for His Highest

    • My Utmost for His Highest June 19, 2013
      . . . do you love Me? . . . Tend My sheep —John 21:16Jesus did not say to make converts to your way of thinking, but He said to look after His sheep, to see that they get …

CODEPINK Protests Guantánamo at the Supreme Court (video)

“Illegally invade countries, but don’t put your foot on the steps!”  Way to go, CODEPINK, my heroes! ~ Lo

Dandelion Salad

WHYNotNews

Dec. 5, 2007

US Supreme Court Hears Guantánamo Arguments

While the justices and lawyers entertained arguments about the legal niceties surrounding the Bush Administration’s policies of torturing and detaining so-called military combatants inside the toasty chambers of the Supreme Court, protesters and the weather itself provided the backdrop for the chilling effect those policies have had on the American psyche, American jurisprudence and American prestige worldwide.

see

Guantanamo Detainees’ Fate at Stake by Prof Marjorie Cohn

Olbermann: Nuclear Fallout + Faith Based Intelligence + Homeland Insecurity + Worst Person (videos)

Dandelion Salad

heathr234

Dec. 5, 2007

Nuclear Fallout

Keith weighs in on the recent news of the NIE and how it affected the NPR Democratic debate and the problems it also presents for the Republican candidates who have been so hawkish on Iran. Dana Milbank weighs in.

Faith Based Intelligence

Keith gives his report on the continuing spin surrounding the NIE by the Bush administration and the other neocons like John Bolton. Howard Fineman weighs in on the administration’s lack of credibility and the repurcussions of that lack of credibility.

Homeland Insecurity

A new report just came out by CREW on the waste and fraud which has occurred in the Department of Homeland Security. Rachel Maddow weighs in on the theft and handouts for government cronies which has been going on at FEMA and the DHS.

Worst Person

And the winner is….Mitt Romney. Runners up Charles Krauthammer and Bill O’Reilly.

see

Iran Intelligence Report: Another Psychological Warfare? By Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich

Kucinich: New NIE Report Shows Bush Admin Has Once Again Tried To Falsify Grounds For A War With Iran + calls Dem candidates’ judgment into question (updated)

Screw You Sudan! Also, No Nukes in Iran — Attack!! by William Mac (video)

Fact-Checking Dobbs: CNN Anchor Lou Dobbs Challenged on Immigration Issues (link)

College Student to Kucinich: Will I Waste My Vote? + Business as an Agent of World Benefit (videos; Elizabeth)

Dandelion Salad

Jamethiel1

A college student asks Kucinich if a vote for him is a wasted vote. Hear his response!

Kucinich–Business as an Agent of World Benefit

Jamethiel1

Dennis and Elizabeth speak of their vision for the future of American business at a town hall meeting in Keene, NH, 11/25/07.

see

Kucinich Wins & Loses NPR’s Post-Debate Analysis By Manila Ryce + Kucinich, Gravitational Field

Determined, Steady Kucinich Quadruples Support By Joe Shea & Ted Manna + Kucinich First, Edwards Second in PDA Straw Poll

Kucinich: Can’t be bullied + A Child Asks Kucinich About Environmental Education (videos)

http://december152007.com/

Kucinich Wins & Loses NPR’s Post-Debate Analysis By Manila Ryce + Kucinich, Gravitational Field

Dandelion Salad

By Manila Ryce
The Largest Minority
Published Wednesday, December 5th, 2007, 2:49 pm

Kucinich Wins and Loses NPR’s Post-Debate Analysis

I don’t expect any more enlightenment from NPR than I do from the cable news networks, so it wasn’t too surprising that Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gravel had less time to speak during NPR’s Democratic presidential debate than the main three media darlings of the Democratic Party. While NPR may be more reliable than other corporate news sources, I agree with FAIR’s assessment that, “NPR’s guestlist shows the radio service relies on the same elite and influential sources that dominate mainstream commercial news, and falls short of reflecting the diversity of the American public.” In short, NPR is just a more palatable version of the corporate media.FAIR’s criticism is justified by the following example. Richard Wolffe, a commentator for MSNBC and Senior White House Correspondent for Newsweek, was called on by NPR to give his post-debate verdict. You can listen to his analysis here. While I applaud Wolffe for recognizing that Kucinich had won the debate (who else in the media has ever acknowledged that?) he did so reluctantly and condescendingly. He couldn’t bring himself to say that Dennis won the debate without prefacing it with “I hate to say this BUT…” or “A Kucinich administration doesn’t make any sense to me BUT…“. Rather than offer an objective point of view, the NPR host merely laughs at Wolffe’s backhanded compliments. I’d like to know what is so horrible about Kucinich that makes recognizing him as anything other than a fringe candidate or a kook that sees UFOs an unforgivable sin? Stop apologizing and try to show some journalistic integrity you fucking hacks.

***

Dennis Kucinich, Gravitational Field

by Laura Conaway
NPR

Interesting tidbit on darkhorse candidate Dennis Kucinich from Newsweek’s Richard Wolffe, after NPR’s Democratic presidential debate on Tuesday:

“Think what you like about Kucinich and UFOs, but this Democratic field has essentially moved to the Kucinich position on trade, on Iraq, on a whole range of things where people thought he was a real outlier. They’re all pretty much in agreement now, when it comes to some of these big issues like trade, like diplomacy and war. And they are where Dennis Kucinich is.”

(Ed. Note: go to this blog to put your 2 cents in. ~ Lo)

FAIR USE NOTICE: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

see
NPR Iowa Public Radio Democratic Debate (audio link) + Iran Sparks Fireworks

Democrat base gives Kucinich third major win in nationwide poll + The Nation Poll

Determined, Steady Kucinich Quadruples Support By Joe Shea & Ted Manna + Kucinich 1st, Edwards 2nd in PDA Straw Poll

http://december152007.com/

Determined, Steady Kucinich Quadruples Support By Joe Shea & Ted Manna + Kucinich 1st, Edwards 2nd in PDA Straw Poll

Dandelion Salad

By Joe Shea and Ted Manna
After Downing Street
American Reporter

BRADENTON, Fla., Dec. 5, 2007 — It’s been a long time coming. Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH, 10th), the former mayor of Cleveland who is serving his fifth term in the House of Representatives has quadrupled his standing in the polls, according to the current USA Today/Gallup Poll.

The poll of Democrats and those leaning toward the Democrats in the 2008 presidential election shows Kucinich tied with Sen. Joe Biden (D-DE), the well-known chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and New Mexico’s Gov. Bill Richardson; he is far ahead of second-generation Conn. Democrat Sen. Chris Dodd.

Rep. Dennis Kucinich has started emerging from the margins and polls show his popularity up sharply as voters respond to a populist message aimed at working Americans.

Among progressives, according to a presidential straw poll released today of 15,000 members of the grassroots Progressive Democrats of America (PDA), Kucinich is far stronger than the rest of the Democratic field. Kucinich placed first in the poll with 41 percent of the vote; his nearest competitor was former Sen. John Edwards, with 26 percent. Among other candidates, only Barak Obama, with 13 percent, scored double digits in the poll.

These improvements come as Kucinich’s message of competence, integrity and foresight is reaching a wider audience through the multiple debates sponsored by the parties, CNN, YouTube and the major television networks. He has also had to fight off ridicule after NBC debate host Tim Russert asked him if he had seen a UFO.

Kucinich, like President Jimmy Carter and orbiting NASA astronauts, admitted that he had – during a visit to the home of Shirley Maclaine – and precipitated a wave of late-night jokes aimed at his supposed gullibility.

But Russert didn’t ask Kucinich why he had stood alone in the House in opposition to the initial resolution empowering the President to start the Iraq War, or his singular opposition to the PATRIOT Act – matters that have far more import – but despite the distraction, Kucinich has finally gained parity with the top “second-tier” candidates and is determined to move up again.

Kucinich’s Colorado state chair, Paige Tomson, 31, credited Kucinich’s recent surge to his stance on Iraq and Iran and the recent interest in beginning impeachment proceedings against current Vice President Dick Cheney.

“His platform is the same as the Democratic Party’s platform,” Tomson told the American Reporter Tuesday. “He is the one candidate in sync with the platform of the party,” she said.

He’s earned it the hard way: by letting time prove him right. As recently as Monday, Kucinich was still a lonely voice in the House of Representatives as he urged moderation and diplomacy in dealing with Iran, while many lawmakers of both parties voiced support for a strike against purported nuclear weapons factories in Iran.

Kucinich was vindicated by a National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) done by America’s top 16 intelligence agencies, which was released on Monday and revealed with “a high degree of confidence” that Iran halted work on nuclear weapons projects in 2003.

In the wake of the NIE Tuesday, he said in a press release the report “is proof positive that this pro-war Administration has been manipulating intelligence,” and added, speaking of other presidential candidates, that the report “reflects their inability to recognize when they’re being duped – again.

“Whatever those candidates say today, remember what they said before: ‘Iran must be stopped at all cost.’ The fact that Iran stopped pursuing nuclear weaponry four years ago is more than an inconvenient revelation for those candidates. It’s an indictment of their judgment and their qualifications to lead this nation,” Kucinich said.

The American Reporter talked with Rep. Kucinich at the CNN Las Vegas Democratic presidential debate about his stand on China trade and his standing in the polls.

Kucinich was only 23 when he was elected to the Cleveland City Council, a young firebrand with a sharp message of dissent that galvanized his working-class district. Elected Mayor in 1977 at age 31, he soon found himself at odds with the Establishment over an effort by banks with strong financial and directorship interests in the private Cleveland Electric (CEI) power utility to take over city-owned Muny Light, the city’s far-cheaper electricity producer.

Rep. Dennis Kucinich, talking with AR’s Joe Shea, says working-class Americans are beginning to understand what his progressive agenda means for them. His support has quadrupled in recent weeks.

Long before the age of Enron, Kucinich saw the plan for what it was. The six banks that demanded that the city give up the public’s utility owned 1.8 million shares of the private CEI, and the banks had eight of their own directors on CEI’s 11-person board. The result was a vicious, all-out 1978 mayoral campaign against Kucinich, generously funded by the banks’ and the utility’s shareholders.

Facing the first loss of his career, Kucinich remained steadfast to his principles, a stand that cost him the race. But Cleveland Magazine in the mid-’90s summed up the underlying victory of his stand: the savings of more than $195 million that Cleveland utility subscribers would have paid the CEI utility, and several hundred union jobs.

Undaunted, Kucinich returned to service on the City Council, and was soon elected to the Ohio State Senate. He was elected to Congress from Cleveland’s 10th District in 1997.

Few Members of Congress can talk convincingly about poverty, but when Kucinich tells of nights his homeless family of seven was forced to sleep outside in a car, and what it was like to live in 21 different places before he turned 17, he can utterly still a restless audience. Few can leave a speech by the Cleveland Democrat without understanding his deeply he feels an obligation to America’s poor, jobless, homeless and abused, or deny his determination to expand and protect America’s middle class.

Today, he serves as chair of the House’s Domestic Policy Subcommittee and brings the same urgency that compelled him to face off against the Cleveland banks to his goals of ending the war in Iraq, preventing an attack on Iran, bolstering health care for America’s children and uninsured, and preserving immigrants’ rights.

On Friday, Dec. 7, Rep. Kucinich will speak at 7:45 p.m. at the Lane Auditorium in the Albemarle County Office Bldg. at 401 McIntire Road (at Preston Road) in downtown Charlottesville, Va. At least one activist, David Swanson, believes the candidate is going to make major news at the event.

But then again, he often has, with a progressive agenda that is finally making progress in the mainstream.

Joe Shea interviewed Rep. Dennis Kucinich on Nov. 15 at the CNN Las Vegas Democratic presidential debate. Ted Manna shot the video and contributed to this report from Denver.

***

Kucinich First, Edwards Second in PDA Straw Poll

By Tim Carpenter
National Director
After Downing Street
www.pdamerica.org

Not surprisingly in a field of eight contenders, no candidate came close to gaining a majority of the total vote in PDA’s recently completed presidential straw poll. But two candidates–Dennis Kucinich (41%) and John Edwards (26%)–combined for more than 2/3 of the total vote. Over 15,000 PDA activists voted in the presidential straw poll. Full results here.

Read the story here.

PDA, for whom election protection is a key issue, made that a priority of this survey, adding extra layers of security to our online voting process in order to strengthen the integrity of the poll. We thank the members of the PDA community who participated in the poll–extra kudos to those who persevered after experiencing problems.

Now, please contact the campaign of your choice and volunteer your time and skills. And, remember to take the Progressive Agenda with you!

In peace and solidarity,
Tim

FAIR USE NOTICE: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

see

Democrat base gives Kucinich third major win in nationwide poll + The Nation Poll

Kucinich calls for Congressional investigation of NIE handling

Iran Intelligence Report: Another Psychological Warfare? By Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich

Dennis Kucinich for President – Contribute

http://december152007.com/

Chavez and the referendum + Chavez and why the referendum failed (videos)

Dandelion Salad

TheRealNews

More at http://therealnews.com
Gregory Wilpert on the Venezuelan referendum

Chavez and why the referendum failed

see

The Red Devil By Pepe Escobar

Venezuelan Referendum: A Post-Mortem and its Aftermath by Prof. James Petras

Iran Intelligence Report: Another Psychological Warfare? By Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich

Dandelion Salad

By Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich
12/05/07 “ICH

‘To subdue an enemy without fighting is the acme of skill…’ – Sun Tzu

Under the current administration, it is increasingly difficult to know who the enemy is, but what is certain is that the latest National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) is a brilliantly executed psychological warfare by way of misinformation. This dastardly plan is so devious that even the anti-war groups are jubilant at its release, and they are naively sharing its contents. Perhaps non are as enthusiastic about the report as the most powerful lobby group in America hostile to Iran.

The AIPAC was quick to announce: “Far from acquitting Iran, the NIE reveals that Tehran continues to violate the international community’s calls to end the pursuit of the fuel cycle and the ability to make highly enriched uranium, concludes that Iran has utilized and has at its disposal a hidden, secret second unacknowledged, unmonitored track for enriching bomb fuel, and has engaged in a nuclear weaponization program, an assessment never before made public by the American intelligence community”. “All in all, it’s a clarion call for additional and continued effort to pressure Iran economically and politically to end its illicit nuclear programs”
(source JTA http://www.jta.org/cgi-bin/iowa/breaking/105674.html ).

The NIE claims that ‘Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003’. This report now in circulation, and being repeated by every media outlet, and as importantly, by way of word of mouth, is giving credibility to the warmongers that Iran actually had a nuclear weapons program, with the idea that ‘repetition begets belief’. Drumming home a false message, the White House will get the justification it needs to impose further sanctions, with the idea of escalating into a war.

In December 2002, an Iranian terrorist group, the Mojahedeen-e Khalg (MEK), listed on the State Department’s list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations, informed the U.S. government of the existence of two nuclear sites in Iran. Sy Hersh later revealed in *The New Yorker* that Israel had provided them with this information. It must also be pointed out that as a member of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), Iran is not under any obligations to inform the IAEA of construction sites. However, members must inform the Atomic Agency 180 days prior to introducing uranium processing equipment and material to the site. Once the United States confirmed the existence of the sites by satellite, it accused Tehran of “across-the-board pursuit of weapons of mass destruction.” To dispel such accusations, Iran agreed to intrusive inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency. This accusation was false.

Iran was late in reporting which is a Safeguard issue. In a spirit of cooperation, and in an attempt to demonstrate its in October 2003, after meeting French, German and British foreign ministers, Tehran voluntarily stopped the process of enriched uranium; it also allowed the IAEA to carry out intrusive, spot inspections. No country has allowed as many inspection hours as Iran. In the meanwhile, it proposed to operate Iran’s enrichment program as joint ventures with private and public sector firms from other countries; this would ensure that the program remained transparent and could not be secretly diverted for military purposes, at the same time it would maintain Iran’s sovereignty by having an indigenously enriched uranium cycle (source: IAEA Bulletin Online, vol 46, no 2, 2004 “Nuclear fuel cycle: which way forward for multilateral approaches?”) . Although this was rejected, Iran continued to cooperate.

Iran suspended its enrichment activities for two and half years, but each time under pressure from the U.S., the burden of proof was transferred to Iran knowing the negative could not be proved. Instead of Iran getting the full cooperation of the IAEA for the development of nuclear technology, it was ordered to stop preparations for large-scale uranium enrichment. In 2005 U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell labeled Iran a growing danger and called for the UN Security Council to impose sanctions.

According to Article 19 of Iran’s safeguards agreement with the IAEA, the Agency may refer Iran to the UN Security Council if it is “unable to verify that there has been no diversion of nuclear material required to be safeguarded under this agreement, to nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices”. The IAEA had reported that all declared fissile material in Iran had been accounted for, and none has been diverted. (source: http://www.iaea.org/NewsCenter
/Statements/2005/ebsp2005n009.html

In December 2006, Congress overwhelmingly signed a controversial bill to expand the sale of civilian nuclear technology to India. Not only is this bill in violation of Article III of the NPT given that India is not a member state of the NPT, but the irony is that the catalyst for the Nuclear Supplier Group (NSG)) in 1976 was India’s nuclear test. This group (first called the London Group) met to restrain the transfer of uranium-enrichment and plutonium-extraction equipment and technology. What added to the Iranian grievance was the speech given by undersecretary of State, Nicholas Burns, as he announced the U.S.-India nuclear cooperation: “after 30 years we have realized that the NPT is ineffective, therefore we are going to reward India for non-proliferation . In response to a reporter who quizzed him about Iran, he said we plan to punish Iran for violating the NPT. Iran was sent to the UNSC, however, later it was revealed by (former) undersecretary for arms control Radermaker that the U.S. had coerced India into voting against Iran.

As for the covert operations Iran is accused of, again, it is worthwhile examining the facts versus the mainstream media propaganda.

In 1982 Iranian officials announced that they planned to build a reactor powered by their own uranium at the Isfahan nuclear technology centre after the Iraqis destroyed the one almost completed under the Shah. The IAEA inspected that and other facilities in Iran in 1983, and planned to assist Iran in converting yellowcake into reactor fuel. The IAEA report stated clearly that its aim was to “contribute to the formation of local expertise and manpower needed to sustain an ambitious program in the field of nuclear power reactor technology and fuel cycle technology” – the inalienable right of an NPT signatory under Article IV, but the agency’s assistance program was terminated under US pressure (source: Mark Hibbs, “US in 1983 stopped IAEA from helping Iran make UF6″, Nuclear Fuel, 4 August 2003).

Undeterred, Iran searched for alternatives sources of uranium and in 1984 Iranian radio announced that negotiations with Niger on the purchase of uranium were nearing conclusion. In 1985 another broadcast openly discussed the discovery of uranium deposits in Iran with the director of Iran’s atomic energy organization. [In 1992, an IAEA spokesperson, Melissa Flemming, confirmed that its inspectors had visited the mines and Iran had announced plans to develop the full nuclear fuel cycle. Source: Associated Press, 10 February 2003 and “Front End nuclear capability being developed”, Nuclear Engineering International, 31 March 2003.

Tehran had openly entered into negotiations with several nations, including Brazil, Russia, India, Argentina, Germany, Ukraine and Spain, for the purchase of nuclear energy facilities and components. Almost all of these deals ultimately fell through after pressure from Washington. Iran finally turned to the Soviet Union( later Russia) and concluded a deal in .

Despite economic ties with Iran and a foothold into the Moslem world, under pressure from the U.S., Russian officials expelled Iranians studying nuclear physics and missile science from Russian schools in late 1997 (Iran Times, August 22, 1997). They also halted all vocational training of Iranian students in fields that may have had applications for nuclear weapons and missiles. In addition to this, the power stations that Iran bought from Russia and China are peaceful nuclear technology. President Yeltsin assured Washington that Iran would not be able to make weapons-grade plutonium and that he had canceled the “military components” of two nuclear reactors bound for Iran. Under U.S. pressure, both Ukraine and China have made some adjustments. China also suspended the sale of a plant for the conversion of uranium hexafluoride, which is required for making fuel rod.

Non of this points to a covert nuclear program.

For readers who feel some relief that the prospect of an imminent war has somewhat faded, let us be reminded of the report’s ‘findings’, its implications, and of recent history.

Word is being circulated that sanctions were effective in curbing Iran’s nuclear weapons program. First, as discussed above, Iran did not have a nuclear weapons program, and second, Iran voluntarily halted its enrichment program two years BEFORE sanctions wre imposed on it.

The international community must put pressure on world leaders to lift current sanctions on Iran. It cannot be emphasized strongly enough that sanctions are a form of long warfare. How can we forget the 500,000 Iraqi children who died as a result of our sanctions? We shamelessly overlook the other Iraqis whose lives we took with our sanctions. As citizens of the country we live in and as members of a global community, each one of us must be reminded of the “Universal Declaration of Human Rights” and act on it:

Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world, Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations, Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom, Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in cooperation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

see

Kucinich calls for Congressional investigation of NIE handling

The Red Devil By Pepe Escobar

Dandelion Salad

By Pepe Escobar
12/05/07 “ICH

The sweeping constitutional reforms proposed by President Hugo Chavez that would “open the path to 21st century socialism” were rejected on Sunday’s dramatic referendum in Venezuela. But the devil, of course, is in the details, largely overlooked by global corporate media. The “Yes” lost to the “No”, as Chavez himself identified, essentially because of a low turnout. According to Venezuela’s National Electoral Council the No got 50.7% and the Yes 49.3%, with a 44% abstention.

Crucially, what this means is that roughly one-third of Venezuela wants to forge towards democratic socialism no matter what; one-third prefers to remain under the standard liberal capitalist system; and one-third has not made up their minds yet, or was just too busy surviving to bother to vote. This de facto three-way tie, in itself, is also a major political earthquake. In virtually every country in South America, except fierce US ally Colombia, a similar referendum might yield similar results. The world is definitely not flat.

The (red) devil will bounce back. Chavez, perhaps more than anyone, knows how the radical but peaceful battle for more social justice – not only in South America, but globally – will be a long and winding road. After suffering his first defeat in no less than seven elections spanning almost nine years he could not but concede, sensibly, that his sweeping reforms were stalled, “for now.” At the Miraflores palace in Caracas, he said he would never be satisfied with such a Phyrric victory, with the slimmest of margins. Add to it his graceful acceptance of the popular verdict. No rigging. No attempts at disenfranchising voters. No “hanging chads”. No soap opera in a Supreme Court to overturn a result. No military coup.

Me rich, you poor, and that’s it

Global corporate media’s monomaniac, hysterical blitzkrieg was that a victory of the Yes would have allowed Chavez, a “power-hungry autocrat”, to be re-elected for life. If the Yes had won, that’s the proof there’s no democracy in Venezuela. But the NO has won – to global corporate media’s thunderous embarassment. This means only when Chavez loses there’s democracy in Venezuela.

The presidential re-election for more than two terms was just one among 69 constitutional reform proposals to socialize political and economic relations in Venezuela. The reforms would have given more power to communal councils; reduced daily working hours from 8 to 6 hours (thus creating 200,000 extra jobs for “informal” workers); enshrined an array of social programs in the constitution; and allowed pensions to housewives and informal workers. Any progressive individual in any global latitude and under any political regime is able to recognize that these Venezuelan reforms were a huge step ahead in terms of social inclusion, participatory democracy, alternative (non-neoliberal) economic development, and a more effective central government. Reform, not revolution; the Chavez government itself stressed this was a “transition” towards “21st century socialism”, not the end of the road.

The overall purpose of the revised constitution was wealth redistribution: more state money to develop poor or neglected parts of the country – while fighting back against local corruption. This is something huge masses in South America, Africa, Asia or the Middle East can easily relate to. The dozens of thousands of “people’s councils” would be empowered. They are actually the basis of Venezuela’s democratic socialism – instrumental in empowering the huge masses of up-to-now excluded blacks and Indians, referred to by local elites as “monkeys”.

No wonder the elites had to be afraid, very afraid. Venezuela’s political class, be they self-styled “social democrats” or demo-christians, has traditionally been among the most savage, vile, crass and corrupt in the whole of Latin America. This simple fact alone explains why almost 70 % of the population of a country so rich in natural resources was poor when Chavez was first elected in 1999. The difference is that now the poor – in Venezuela and elsewhere in South America – have understood true democracy has nothing to do with what they had experienced in the past.

To the horror of Milton Friedman acolytes, Washington Consensus cheerleaders, structural adjustment practitioners and assorted “disaster capitalism” neocons, Venezuela is a country where peasant collectives are evolving into cooperatives. Article 112 of the proposed new constitution said the state would promote “different kinds of economic enterprises” – private, mixed, or run by a local community – with the target of “collective and cooperative construction of a socialist economy.” If Chavez was Salvador Allende in 1973 Chile everybody knows how Washington would “liberate” him.

Another article stated that at least five million independent workers – up to now totally unprotected – would have access to a guaranteed minimum wage, social security, pensions and paid holidays. This concerned masses of peasants, fishermen, taxi drivers, hairdressers, housewives and domestic servants.

What the elites were terrified of was not so much the possibility of Chavez being re-elected for years; what they needed to defeat at any price was the constitutional status of the ongoing social justice/wealth redistribution project.

President Lula in Brazil, as well as his Workers Party – one of the largest political parties in the world – were very much in favor of the Yes, in spite of marked differences with Chavez’s strategy and non-stop “attack mode” political style. Lula is always branded by Wall Street and US power elites as the “acceptable” face of a progressive South American leader, in contrast to (red) devil Chavez.

When King Juan Carlos of Spain – who forgot that he reclaimed the monarchy thanks to fascist dictator Francisco Franco – told Chavez to “shut up” at the recent Ibero-American summit in Chile, Lula tried to smooth things over by praising the “democratic” character of the Bolivarian Republic. For Lula, it’s perfectly acceptable for a President (or a Prime Minister) to remain in power for more than a decade. He has referred to European parliamentary democracies and long mandates by Margaret Thatcher, Tony Blair and Felipe Gonzalez.

Lula’s opinion anyway was drowned by the vast corporate, center-right anti-Chavez front in Brazil, which counts on Washington’s enthusiastic support and tries by all means to frustrate the official Venezuelan entry to the regional Mercosur common market.

Green and Red Zones

This time Chavez had to fight not only powerful business tycoons, financial capital, the landowning class, the Catholic Church, corrupt union leaders and myriad manifestations of US muscle – mirrored in the formidable demonization-of-Chavez global corporate media blitzkrieg; in sum, as Gramsci might put it, a coalition of all the forces pertaining to the Old Order.

He also had to fight the inevitable erosion of an ongoing, slow revolutionary process; the skepticism and most of all apathy of “light Chavistas”, who were not sufficiently informed on what Bolivarian socialism would look like; corruption charges against sectors of the state apparatus; some high-profile defections like his former Defense Minister Raul Baduel and his ex-wife Marisabel Rodriguez; and most of all a young, upper middle class, formerly apathetic student movement.

There was nothing about “the conscience of a country” in these vocal student protests. A few students hailed from public universities but most come from elite private universities such as Andres Bello, the top Catholic university in Caracas. Mirroring the color-coded revolutions in the former Soviet sphere, student groups were lavished with funds from the US Agency for International Development (USAID) under the cloak of “conflict resolution” or “democracy promotion”. But as much as the Bush administration may be eager to instrumentalize them, the fact is the absolute majority of university students in Venezuela still support Chavez.

The polarization of the whole country is more than glaring in Caracas, with upper-class Altamira, who voted overwhelmingly No, contraposed to the hilly, crowded January 23 neighborhod, who voted overwhelmingly Yes. It’s the perfect metaphor of a world divided into Green Zones and Red Zones. In the Green Zone people are avidly consumerist and their idea of paradise is Miami. In the Red Zone people benefit from the work of a mision – a social program to bring secondary education to poor areas.

In the Red Zone – with most of its walls painted red, splashed with pictures of Bolivar, Chavez and Che Guevara, and teemig with self-described “social militants” – a victory of the No is interpreted as a defeat for all of Latin America. In the Green Zone it’s interpreted as the last gasp to stop the revolution – equaled to dictatorship – in its tracks. Had the No lost most of Altamira would have boarded the first flight to Miami.

So many enemies, so little time

Argentine political scientist Atilio A. Boron has characterized the referendum as a “baptism of fire” to see how crucial transformations in Latin America – the most unequal region in the world in terms of social justice – may be implemented: peacefully or violently. We’re not there – yet.

If Chavez – at least for a while – lost basically to voter apathy, a ruthless Plan B was already in the works, echoing the dark days of the US-backed or engineered 1970s dictatorships. Less than a week before the referendum the CIA-orchestrated Operation Pincer was unmasked by Venezuelan intelligence, with its emphasis on instantly disallowing a majority Yes vote by claiming fraud and then pushing towards a coup. As Boron stresses, “imperialism does not admit changes, either by the insurrectional or the institutional way”.

Before the referendum Chavez had insisted that “To vote ‘yes’, is a vote for Chavez and the revolution, to vote ‘No’ is a vote for Bush”. This might have been essentially true to many (not only in Venezuela but all over Latin America) but tactically it was a huge mistake. Chavez may have insisted “Our true enemy is US imperialism” but in fact he made no effort to convince at least part of what he terms “the pawns of imperialism” – corrupt Venezuelan elites.

The elites for their part made the best use of a lot of propaganda money from the US embassy in Caracas (US$ 8 million, according to an intercepted embassy memo), unlimited free time on right-wing media, the power of the Church, and the I-love-Miami student crowd while Chavez and the government machine were not able to convince a lot of people that the reforms would not benefit Chavez more than they would benefit the people. Thus a new political phenomenon was born – the Chavista who votes No (estimated at a huge 8 percentual points in the week before the vote, according to the Datanalisis polling firm).

As late as October the Yes was winning. But then the opposition started banging on the Holy Grail – the article restricting private property. On top of it Chavez had no political opponent to battle with (“Imperialist” Bush, after all, is a foreigner). So he fought Colombian President Alvaro Uribe instead – a US-backed visceral right-winger, very close to extreme right-wing paramilitaries, who unilaterally terminated Chavez’s mediation to liberate hostages in power of the Marxist FARC guerrillas in Colombia (the Bush administration would never allow Uribe to allow Chavez such a worldwide PR success). The problem is there are one million Colombians living in Venezuela. They may well have been the masses that tilted the vote towards the No.

I’ll be back

Then again, this is just a skirmish in a very long battle. Chavez, even in defeat, emerges as the leader of a true democratic republic (even people in France are comparing him favorably with Bonapartist Nicolas Sarkozy). Chavez will take the package to Parliament approval and may call another referendum after 2010 (the new presidential election is in 2012). Washington also won’t quit. The CIA didn’t have to deploy Operation Pincer – at least for now.

As usual the CIA was relying on bad HUMINT: the agency was counting on a Yes victory by 57%, with 60% abstention. Anyway the US destabilization effort this time was way more subtle than in 2002 when, after the US and Spain-supported coup against the elected Chavez government, the local elites forced an oil industry shutdown in which US$ 10 billion of the Venezuelan economy went up in smoke.

Chavez remains so popular all across the developing world because he’s the man who spells out what everyone is thinking. Take, for instance, the recent OPEC summit in Riyadh, where he was side by side with another “devil”, Islamic revolutionary and Iranian President Mahmud Ahmadinejad: “The empire of the dollar is crashing”. The next day, in Paris, after he discussed with Sarkozy his mediation in the Colombian hostages drama, he says that “Iran is a power and Venezuela is becoming one. We want to create a bipolar world. We don’t want a single power.”

Most of all Chavez is so dangerous for Washington and right-wing comprador elites in Latin America because he is pushing, no holds barred, towards democratic socialism. For Washington and Wall Street elites this is way worse than the spectre of totalitarian communism branded throughout the Cold War. Everyone in Latin America remembers how Allende in the early 1970s was demonized as a Stalinist dictator by a CIA-funded propaganda campaign. But it was Henry Kissinger who got the whole point, when he told then President Nixon how Allende had to be taken out because he was such a bad example for the rest of the developing world. Chavez is the 21st century Allende. He has already survived a US-backed coup, in 2002. And he knows others – the sons of Operation Pincer – are in the works. Still, even if the Yes had won, he would not have as much institutional power as George Bush.

Meanwhile, expect the (red) devil to be routinely pillored by global corporate media. Of course there is crime, corruption and government waste in Venezuela – like anywhere else. But the most important point, from a global perspective, is to examine how the Chavez experiment evolves, as a trial-and-error revolutionary process, and if and how social justice is spreading.

According to the UN, in 2006 alone poverty in Venezuela fell from 37.1% to 30.2%. Extreme poverty fell from 15.9% to 9.9%. Venezuela is on the way to reach its first Millennium Development Goal. The No vote has not reversed what eminent US Latin American expert James Petras describes as “the most promising living experience of popular self-rule, of advanced social welfare and democratically based socialism.” The resistance – or micro-resistances, on individual and small collective levels – continues. That’s how the liliputians will eventually topple the neoliberal Gulliver. You cant’ beat a (red) devil that easily.

Pepe Escobar is the roving correspondent for Asia Times (www.atimes.com). He’s the author of Globalistan: How the Globalized World is Dissolving into Liquid War (Nimble Books, 2007). He may be reached at pepeasia@yahoo.com

FAIR USE NOTICE: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

see

Venezuelan Referendum: A Post-Mortem and its Aftermath by Prof. James Petras

The Harris Pole 2007: Based on My Annual Interview with Santa Claus by The Other Katherine Harris

The Other Katherine Harris

by The Other Katherine Harris

Featured writer
Dandelion Salad

The Other Katherine Harris’s blog
Dec. 5, 2007

For the complete Harris Pole experience, please see the illustrated version HERE.

Happy Holiday Wishes to You and Yours!

NORTH POLE – Visiting formerly ice-bound Kringleshire is almost easy now, with ferries and hovercraft replacing sled services across the Arctic region. Although a boon for the elf economy, which lost many toy manufacturing jobs to Asian imports, maritime transit has put countless dogs are out of work. Once-proud Huskies hound travelers in most localities, begging scraps. However, those lucky enough to reach the headquarters of Kringle clan chief and philanthropist S. Claus can count on a dignified retirement at full rations.

What can’t be counted on there is a functional dock, since the rising sea keeps submerging them. Claus met my ferry in a rowboat on which a lovely dog sat like a hood ornament. “She was almost starved, when she got here,” he told me, giving the Husky a cuddle. “We take in as many as we can,” he added — a fact that became evident on reaching shore.

We stopped to pat a few Huskies lolling on sun loungers, as we made our way into the house, which rocked on a new understructure of pontoons placed to save it from the melt. Once settled into his study to conduct the interview, I turned my recorder on and posed the obvious first question. “You’re getting lots of letters asking for pets, I hope?”

Claus winced. “Pups are usually easy to place, but — “

“Hardly anybody wants an old dog. I know.”

“Fewer and fewer. Folks can’t justify paying a vet, if they can barely afford a doctor.”

“You’ve been following news of our health crisis,” I observed with a nod toward his computer in the corner.

“Hardly necessary. You could write a history of the world from the letters in my warehouses.” He exchanged his shades for specs and showed me a spreadsheet. “Pet requests have been down for months,” he pointed out, ” and lately we’re receiving cancellations. With food costs rocketing as they are, taking on another mouth to feed is a problem everywhere. And, in your country and Britain, people are losing their houses, or in fear of it. They don’t know if they’ll have a yard next year or if animals will be allowed.”

“It’s grim,” sighed an elf who stepped in bearing cocoa. He looked about 10, but must have been much older, since he went on to say, “We haven’t read so many heart-wrenching notes since 1929.”

“Make that circa 1200, Mustardseed. They’re back to begging for habeas corpus.” Claus rifled through a stack of ancient parchments on his desk and plucked one out, saying, “On second thought, make it 1184.”

I took a quick look at the letter he gave me and returned it. “Sorry, I don’t read Middle English.”

“Essentially it says, ‘Dear King Frost, please make this Inquisition thingy stop. They’re smacking my parents around.’ And the P.S. asks if they might someday have a bit of land to work that no overlord could take the best from, or drive them off. “

His eyes were misting over and he didn’t bother trying to hide it. He set a hand on another sheaf of documents, as if absorbing pain through his palm. “These are a few from the The Hundred Years’ War. At the start, it was about Gascony and controlling salt and wine. Lord, how everybody wanted a longbow then, and lessons. Crossbows were totally over. But soon Brit kids were begging for their dads to come back from occupying France. The French were pleading not to be burned out of their homes and for a king who wasn’t mad as a badger. Toward the end, some asked only for me to save Jeanne from the kangaroo court and the stake.”

“Stunning, the similarities,” I nodded. “How did we regress so many centuries within a lifetime? A little mortal lifetime, I mean, and just a piece of it. I can remember –”

Suddenly Claus’ blue gaze drilled a hole through me. “That’s your burden to bear. Your lot had the best deal civilization ever managed to produce for the general good and you threw it away.”

“You know we were duped.”

“You let yourselves be duped. They were only richer and greedier than you, not smarter.” His pensive face broke to a tiny smile. “When your mother said, ‘You have to follow the rules, because they were made by people a lot smarter than we are,’ do you recall what you told her?”

“Out doing a ‘naughty’ check, were you?”

“You screamed, ‘They may be older and know more than I do right now, but they aren’t any smarter!’ You were six then and properly outraged.”

“I made your globe that year,” Mustardseed grinned while topping up our cocoa cups.

“I loved that globe! I wore it out.”

Claus hmpfed and I turned to him, saying, “I loved the books you picked, too, about ancient civilizations and distant places. I read them over and over –”

“Well, they certainly didn’t do for you what a set of letter blocks did for Joey Gutenberg! And you always liked the dolls best.”

“So I’m no inventor. Are you suggesting it was frivolous for me to major in –”

“I don’t mind if you studied pheasant-plucking! But what did you ever do as a citizen, besides vote, until recently?”

“Um, I did watch the Watergate hearings.”

“All those things you’re proud of blogging about now, you could’ve figured out decades sooner, if you hadn’t been too much the artiste to sully your thoughts with political theory and economics.”

“You read my blogs?”

“Does the name ‘Edmund Burke’ mean anything to you?”

“Didn’t he write a boring riff on Aristotelian aesthetics?”

“At 25. A scribble. Eddie grew up to be a politician. He supported your own country against the old King George. In Parliament, he also made a name by tearing into the East India Company, first of those transnationals you eventually learned to abhor. Burke knew what they were capable of, like fomenting famine in Bengal by buying up all the rice when the rains failed. This is the line I most hoped you’d run across: ‘There is no safety for honest men except by believing all possible evil of evil men.’ It might have changed your life.”

“Yeah, I’ve been way too trusting. Even when I knew better, I chose it as a virtue.”

The ho-hos that followed weren’t merry, merely loud enough to hear in Greenland. After they subsided, Claus expounded on Burke’s reactionary turn, when the French revolted. At heart, he was an elitist upholding hereditary ascendancy, although he expected the privileged to play nicely with others and opposed unrestrained power even in royals. “Schizy,” Claus summed him up, “but anti-tyranny.”

“You find a lot of time to read, I guess. In the off-season.”

Claus hmphed again. “Being allusive is unbecoming at your age. If you’re trying to say I’m full of shit, just say it.”

“Santa! This isn’t like you!”

Oh? You should’ve seen me in 1184, Sweetheart, when that first Inquisition took off. And at plenty of other times when the bastards were extending themselves. This is worse, because they were finally being reined in!”

“My point was just the lack of time to read. Americans work longer now than anybody outside East Asian sweatshops.”

“And my point is that you brought it on yourselves. Justice never comes as a gift. People have to demand it. Or do what’s needed to keep it. What were you doing when they started busting unions? What were you doing when jobs began flooding out and imports in? What were you doing when they killed the Fairness Doctrine and created media monopolies to shill for them? What were you doing when they caused the first wave of homelessness by closing mental hospitals — literally turning sick people out on the streets? What were you doing when they canceled alternate energy tax credits and subsidized oil companies, instead? What were you doing when they cut taxes on corporations and the rich — again and again? What were you doing while your country crushed other societies with corrupt dictatorships and debt, in the name of development aid? What were you doing while the environment went to ruin? What was so bloody important that you couldn’t take note and say NO?”

“Why didn’t you tell us?”

“Oh, please. Surely you grasp how it works by now, Ms. Rather-Be-a-Victim-than-a-Predator, after wasting so much of your life making a false choice come true. You’ve wished yourself all the way to an honorable victimhood — saddled with your own dictator and kangaroo courts, debt that will take generations to pay and a workhouse economy with no use for your kind.”

“Because we thought it was bound to stop; we expected better of humanity –”

“Hell, even Ghandi said, ‘Non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as cooperation with good.’”

“Yes, yes, I get it! But for most of these decades of ruin, we weren’t in charge; much older people were!”

“That’s pitiful. You kids managed to stop the disaster in Vietnam, didn’t you?”

“And then came Kent State! We were terrorized.”

“Exactly. That was their first strike back at the vanguard of an educated middle class that actually threatened to run the world. It worked. You’ve been cowards ever since — scared children in a trance, clinging to your comforting ideals while the bigger kids beat them with sticks, tore their eyes out, snapped their heads off. Only the worst of you grew up until lately. You’ve let the sort who tortured animals as tots become your leaders: the bullies, the shameless liars, the wantonly greedy. They don’t succumb to shock; they specialize in doing the shocking, and these few defectives without empathy have had full sway, because you refused to challenge them, refused even to believe they could be that awful. Meanwhile, new generations floundered, lacking your memory of better times and the principled leadership you should have given them sooner. And so it came to this.”

While Claus closed his eyes and rubbed them, I turned the recorder off and finished my cocoa. “Yep,” I said, “we’re back in the world again, trying to do in our 50s what we should have done in our 20s. It was a long, long sleep. And this is going to be a long, long Harris Pole. Usually they’re short squibs about clever ways you’re coping with the meltdown here, how the sleigh got booster rockets to keep Dick Cheney from shooting you down as a terrorist and how the Justice Department keeps suing you over your ‘naughty and nice’ files, smoking on an aircraft, abusing children by giving them sugary treats, promoting world peace and saying ‘happy holidays’. This year — well, it definitely went another direction — but I’d entertained visions of your joining Reverend Billy’s ‘Stop the Shopacalpyse’ tour.”

Claus opened an eye and let out a really good ho-ho. Mustardseed hopped up and down, squealing, “That’s where we’ll be tomorrow!”

“Let’s go hear the elves practicing their new carols,” Claus suggested, which set the elf racing out ahead of us and singing, “Pack the malls with folks with money. T’is the season to be dummies!”

“I can only go where the wishes take me, you know,” Claus confided as we followed, “and lately the letters are showing a lot more sense. Things could be very different by next Christmastime.”


see

Babes at Arms by The Other Katherine Harris (child soldiers; recruiting)

Democrat base gives Kucinich third major win in nationwide poll + The Nation Poll

Dandelion Salad

by Dennis Kucinich’s campaign

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Democratic Presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich has won another major poll among grassroots Party activists most likely to vote in caucuses and primaries, capturing 41% of the vote from Progressive Democrats of America (PDA), which has more than 80,000 members across the nation.

In the field of eight candidates, the Ohio Congressman was the overwhelming winner, easily out-pacing second-place finisher former Senator John Edwards, who received 26% of the vote. Senator Barack Obama came in third with 13%, followed by Senator Hillary Clinton with 9%, and New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson with 5%. The other Democratic candidates were in the low single digits. Kucinich was also the top vote-getter among PDA members in the early-voting states of Iowa and New Hampshire.

It is the third exceptionally strong finish by Kucinich in polls among active, grassroots Democrats. Last month, he topped all other candidates in 47 of 50 states in a poll sponsored by Democracy for America (DFA). Also, a poll conducted by the progressive The Nation magazine showed Kucinich with 35% of the vote, Obama second with 24% and Edwards third with 13%.

In last month’s DFA poll, Kucinich received almost 32% of the 150,000-plus votes cast, more than Edwards and Obama combined. There, too, he won both Iowa and New Hampshire.

In announcing today’s results, PDA said, “The Congressman’s showing indicates that Progressive Democrats are still in sync with the Kucinich agenda: Out of Iraq; no attack on Iran, single-payer healthcare, fair trade, etc.” The poll was open only to PDA members, and the organization said it added “extra layers of security” to protect the integrity of the survey.

In an analysis of the recent polls in The Nation today, Washington correspondent John Nichols wrote that Kucinich’s “pointed opposition to the war in Iraq and outspoken advocacy of impeachment of Vice President Cheney has echoed the sentiments of the Democratic base” and “party activists who do the heavy lifting.”

Nichols also noted, “The DFA and PDA poll results give Kucinich an additional measure of credibility as he reaches out to key activists, including Democrats who are currently leaning toward other contenders…”

Kucinich’s national and state-by-state poll numbers have risen noticeably in the past several weeks. Not only is he the only Democratic candidate who voted against the Iraq war authorization in 2002 and every supplemental funding measure since, he also is the only Democratic candidate who voted against the Patriot Act. And, his early opposition to hostile moves by the Administration towards Iran was validated earlier this week when the National Intelligence Estimate revealed that Iran had abandoned its nuclear weapons program four years ago.

Kucinich, sponsor of a resolution calling for impeachment proceedings against Cheney, has called for a Congressional investigation of the handling of the NIE findings by the Administration. He said that such an investigation “will further build the case for the impeachment of both the President and the Vice President.”

***

Kucinich Tops Progressive Democrats Poll…

The Nation
Dec. 5, 2007

Ohio Congressman Dennis Kucinich, whose pointed opposition to the war in Iraq and outspoken advocacy of impeachment of Vice President Cheney has echoed the sentiments of the Democratic base, continues to prevail in surveys of members and supporters of activist groups on the party’s left flank.

Kucinich, who last month won the most votes in a survey conducted by Democracy for America, has now come out on top of an online poll of members of Progressive Democrats for America. Kucinich’s strong showing in the PDA survey will not, in and of itself, bring the congressman any closer to the top tier of contenders in the race for the Democratic presidential nomination. But it provides him with new arguments for why his campaign matters, especially to the party activists who do the heavy lifting at the grassroots.

Out of more than 15,000 votes cast in the PDA vote, Kucinich won 6,510 votes, for 41 percent.

continued…

FAIR USE NOTICE: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

see

Kucinich calls for Congressional investigation of NIE handling

Gore Vidal on Dennis Kucinich + New Poll

Kucinich: I am a candidate of the mainstream By Jayson Whitehead (interview)

http://december152007.com/

Kucinich calls for Congressional investigation of NIE handling

Dandelion Salad

by Dennis Kucinich

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Tuesday, December 04, 2007

DES MOINES, IA – Democratic Presidential candidate and Ohio Congressman Dennis Kucinich issued the following statement today to elaborate on comments he made yesterday regarding the U.S. intelligence reports revealing that Iran ended its nuclear weapons program in 2003.

“When taken in concert with the statements and actions of the Administration over the past year regarding Iran, the National Intelligence Estimate reveals a pattern of willful deceit directed at the U.S. Congress, the American people, and the rest of the world on the critical matters of war and peace. As I have been saying since the beginning – and the NIE has finally confirmed – there is no evidence of an Iranian nuclear weapons program.

“More than three months ago, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said Iran was cooperating with inspection procedures and demanded that the Bush Administration disclose any alleged evidence regarding such a program. None was provided. More than a month ago, Russian President Putin revealed findings by his own nation’s intelligence services and announced that there was no credible evidence of an Iranian nuclear weapons program.

“Yet, in the face of both sets of findings, this Administration continued its drumbeat for war. Just this past week, Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns, with the NIE in his hands, was trying to arm-twist our NATO allies and the Republic of China into pressuring the U.N. Security Council to impose additional sanctions on Iran because of its alleged weapons program.

“I call on the Congress to launch an immediate investigation into what our intelligence agencies knew and when they knew it. I believe such an investigation will further build the case for the impeachment of both the President and the Vice President. The fact that the President recently raised the specter of a possible World War III in public comments regarding Iran’s alleged nuclear weapons program — when he knew full well that Iran had no such program – should seriously be considered as a high crime. And, the fact that he and his Vice President have pursued plans for our military to drop 30,000-pound bunker buster bombs on Iranian nuclear research facilities constitutes a war crime.”

Kucinich introduced Articles of Impeachment against Cheney on April 24. Article III of the resolution details the Iran-related basis of the charges against the Vice President. (Click here.)

FAIR USE NOTICE: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

see

Kucinich: New NIE Report Shows Bush Administration Has Once Again Tried To Falsify Grounds For A War With Iran

Kucinich: I am a candidate of the mainstream By Jayson Whitehead (interview)Wild Pitch: Curveball and Selling the Iraq War (long video)

http://december152007.com/

Kucinich: Can’t be bullied + A Child Asks Kucinich About Environmental Education (videos)

Dandelion Salad

Dennis Kucinich: Can’t be bullied

iowacaucuses

Ohio Congressman and Democratic presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich met with The Des Moines Register’s editorial board Thursday, April 12. Kucinich tells the board he doesn’t bow to special interests and cannot be bullied.

Added: November 30, 2007

h/t: Dennis Kucinich (the ORIGINAL UNOFFICIAL Page)

A Child Asks Kucinich About Environmental Education

Jamethiel1

Clip of a child asking Dennis Kucinich what he will do about environmental education in public schools. Keene, NH, 11/25/07.

Added: December 02, 2007

h/t: Dennis Kucinich (the ORIGINAL UNOFFICIAL Page)

see

Dennis Kucinich: 2008 Intro at Mock Primary + Speaks after Brown & Black forum (videos)

NPR Iowa Public Radio Democratic Debate (audio link) + Iran Sparks Fireworks

Kucinich: New NIE Report Shows Bush Administration Has Once Again Tried To Falsify Grounds For A War With Iran

Kucinich: I am a candidate of the mainstream By Jayson Whitehead (interview)

Kucinich on Kucinich health plan Brown & Black Forum (video)

http://december152007.com/

Dennis Kucinich: 2008 Intro at Mock Primary + Speaks after Brown & Black forum (videos)

Dandelion Salad

Dennis Kucinich 2008 Intro

mfsprimary

Introduction video for the Dennis Kucinich campaign in the MFS Mock Primary Election.
Read more at www.mfsprimary.org

Added: December 04, 2007

h/t: Dennis Kucinich (the ORIGINAL UNOFFICIAL Page)

Kucinich – Speaks after Brown and Black forum

videoselectiontv

Ohio Congressman Dennis Kucinich speaks after the Dec. 1 Brown and Black forum in Des Moines.

Added: December 04, 2007

h/t: Dennis Kucinich (the ORIGINAL UNOFFICIAL Page)

see

NPR Iowa Public Radio Democratic Debate (audio link) + Iran Sparks Fireworks

Kucinich: New NIE Report Shows Bush Administration Has Once Again Tried To Falsify Grounds For A War With Iran

Kucinich: I am a candidate of the mainstream By Jayson Whitehead (interview)

Kucinich on Kucinich health plan Brown & Black Forum (video)

http://december152007.com/

Putin and a new pan-Slavism (video; Margolis)

Dandelion Salad

TheRealNews

More at http://therealnews.com
Eric Margolis comments on Putin and Russia’s Duma elections

Wednesday December 5th, 2007

As contributing editor for The American Conservative and Sun Media, and Founding Committee member of The Real News Network Eric Margolis says: “The reason I was drawn to [The Real News] was the fact it seemed to me to be the voice that I and many others had been looking for.”

see

Putin’s Landslide By Eric Margolis

Putin is Stalin? Garry Kasparov and the Far-right Cuckoo’s Nest By Mike Whitney

United Russia party celebrates victory in parliamentary vote (videos)

Vladamir Putin: “The world’s most popular leader”? By Mike Whitney

Monitors denounce Russia election + Putin cements power in Russian election

12.04.07 Uncensored News Reports From Across The Middle East (video; over 18 only)

Dandelion Salad

Warning
.
This video may contain images depicting the reality and horror of war and should only be viewed by a mature audience.

Selected Episode

Dec. 04, 2007

linktv

For more: linktv.org/originalseries
“US Intelligence Estimate Report Causes Worldwide Uproar,” Al Arabiya TV, UAE
“Iran Still Tries to Develop Nukes,” IBA TV, Israel
“Report is an Embarrassment to Bush,” IRIB2 TV, Iran
“Ahmedinajad Attends GCC Summit in Doha,” Abu Dhabi TV, UAE
“Lebanese Getting Closer to Electing a President,” Al Jazeera English, Qatar
“Sudan Frees British Teacher,” Al-Alam TV, Iran
“Sarkozy Criticizes French Colonial History,” Dubai TV, UAE
“Opposition Demands End of Emergency Rule in Pakistan,” Dubai TV, UAE
“11 Year Old Mother in Egypt,” New TV, Lebanon
Produced for Link TV by Jamal Dajani

see

Screw You Sudan! Also, No Nukes in Iran — Attack!! by William Mac (video)