• Categories

  • The Golden Rule

    “That which is hateful to you do not do to another ... the rest (of the Torah) is all commentary, now go study.”

    - Rabbi Hillel

  • Subscribe

  • Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Remember to click "manage" to set your preferences, such as daily and the time of delivery. Thanks!

  • Note

    The huge blue banner ads on the videos are placed there by Wordpress.com, not Dandelion Salad.
  • Lists of posts and videos


    List of all posts

    List of all videos

    Feedburner listing the last 25 posts

    Blogroll

    Open Forum for Dandelion Salad
    (Discussion, comments, whatever you'd like to write about.)

    Don’t Enlist, But Don’t Just Take My Word For It by Lo
    Please pass this on to anyone you know who may be considering enlisting as a soldier (mercenary).

  • Don’t forget to check out more videos on Dandelion Salad’s Lockerz

  • Amendment I

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
  • Disclaimer:

    The views and/or opinions posted on all the blog posts and in the comment sections are of their respective authors, not necessarily those of Dandelion Salad.

    All content has been used with permission from the copyright owners, who reserve all rights, and that for uses outside of fair use (an excerpt), permission must be obtained from the respective copyright owner.

  • Activism – Protests – Boycotts

    Activism Protests Boycotts

    "But remember, this power of the people on top depends on the obedience of the people below. When people stop obeying, they have no power." -- Howard Zinn

  • Socialism

    Socialism on Dandelion Salad
  • Meet the new boss the same as the old boss

    Obama = Bush
  • Food

    Food On Dandelion Salad
  • Global Warming

    Drought
  • US Deaths in Afghanistan: Obama vs Bush. Click here to learn more.
  • Obama’s Wars

    President Obama: Stop the Wars!

    Afghanistan

    Iraq

    Somalia

    Uganda

    Yemen

    Economic Warfare: Sanctions-Embargos

    Cuba

    Iran

    North Korea

  • RSS My Utmost for His Highest

    • My Utmost for His Highest June 19, 2013
      . . . do you love Me? . . . Tend My sheep —John 21:16Jesus did not say to make converts to your way of thinking, but He said to look after His sheep, to see that they get …

Hillary Clinton at the Compassion Forum (videos)

Dandelion Salad

The forum is at Messiah College, Grantham, PA. I stayed at Messiah College for a little over a week back in 2000, some of the best times of my life were there.

Topics include: domestic and international poverty, global AIDS, climate change, genocide in Darfur, and human rights and torture. ~ Lo

VOTERSTHINKdotORG

April 13, 2008
CNN Compassion Forum

see

Letter to Hillary about Monsanto connections (02.03.08)

Bill Moyers Journal: Hunger in America + Exposé Farm Subsidies + Soup Kitchen

Clinton-Hillary

Barack Obama at the Compassion Forum (videos)

Dandelion Salad

The forum is at Messiah College, Grantham, PA. I stayed at Messiah College for a little over a week back in 2000, some of the best times of my life were there.

Topics include: domestic and international poverty, global AIDS, climate change, genocide in Darfur, and human rights and torture. ~ Lo

videocafeblog

April 13, 2008
CNN Compassion Forum

see

Rich vs Right by The Other Katherine Harris

Countdown: “Small Town” comments + Obama Responds + Worse than Watergate

Bill Moyers Journal: Hunger in America + Exposé Farm Subsidies + Soup Kitchen

Hillary Clinton at the Compassion Forum (videos)

Obama-Barack

Chemtrails: The proof based on cumuli (replaced with another video)

Dandelion Salad

Updated 3.6.09 Found a similar video; see below

video no longer available

nicscics

Added: April 13, 2008
Cumuli: low clouds (1500-2300 meters approximately) are crossed by a chemical tanker. Because of the altitude, the aircraft should not create any trail and it’s clear that it’s getting a chemical and biological trail. Italian debunkers want to deny the truth, by asserting that this is not a proof, but a fake or an optical illusion. It’s clear that they lie as usual.

from www.youtube.com posted with vodpod

.

***

Scie chimiche: la distruzione dei cumuli – Metodologie e motivazioni (HQ)

more about “Scie chimiche: la distruzione dei cum…“, posted with vodpod

[Note: I used an online translator, so this isn't an exact translation from Italian to English]

In the within of the clandestine aerosol operations in skies of the world (chemtrails or wakes chemistries), the searches carried out in these last months have carried to some confirmations are as far as the objectives of these military experiments are for how much concern the methods and the strategies.

Some time ago, we have shown various resumptions video that evidenced an important detail: the chemical-biological elements come dispersed, in very many occasions, to of under or inside of cumuli from beautiful time and therefore to not suitable quotas to the formation of wakes of it condenses.

The cumuli are clouds of low type. They find themselves to quotas comprised between the 800 and the 2,300 meters and are formed generally in presence of high pressure. Of usual therefore they appear in the days of beautiful endured time or after a heavy shower. The cumuli denote rather high atmospheric humidity values.

To this point a problem is born: the systems of military communication of last generation between the radar stations to earth, the satellites, the aircrafts with or without pilot, the nanosensori wireless have need of two conditions:

a) The atmospheric medium must be rendered through the dispersion of metals which elettroconduttivo the aluminum and the barium
b) The relative humidity values must be maintained on low levels

The soldiers have resolved this problem, employing squadrons of airplane that release in the atmosphere (to the quotas cumuli) know them of barium, trimetilalluminio and silicon gel, therefore to create a channel for the frequencies radio and, at the same time, to disintegrate present cumuli let alone to prevent the formation of new.

Once that this task is finished, other aircrafts come diverted on the areas in which must be operated a series of definable overflights ” of mantenimento”.

Here therefore explained the employment of airplane that, evidently, also release wakes of evanescente type with extremely low temperatures and that some can exchange for contrails. That re-enters in the requirement at a low altitude to obtain a valid dissimulazione in the creation of a elettroconduttiva cover that it is constituted from layers crafts them or from chemical fog. In fact the elements dispersed with the wakes of not persistent type have the ability to diffuse themselves in short times in the surrounding atmosphere, creating an effect from smerigliato glass. The sky appears opaque, reflecting, dazzling. The blue coloration pale to mattino and the milk-white to the afternoon, let alone the complete cumulus absence from beautiful time, reveals the presence of aerosol activity that all is fuorché wakes of condenses.

The services weather will announce days sunned with ” innocuous airframes of passaggio” or fogs are diffused in reality… are deadly fogs of fallen back, originated from the presence of metals and other elements I am diffused in atmosphere.

***

Photos by Lo (Dandelion Salad)

Chemtrails

Chemtrails

Chemtrails

Chemtrails

In this photo you can see a regular plane’s jet exhaust as well as the persistent trails left by planes long gone from the sky.

see

Aerosolized Powder Contrails? by Rick Nichols

Chemtrails: Is U.S. Gov’t. Secretly Testing Americans ‘Again’? by Jeff Ferrell (+ vid)

Aerosol Crimes 1st Edition + Chemtrails (videos)

CONtrail vs. CHEMtrail – San Francisco (video)

Chemtrails

Chemtrails (lots more info)


http://mynasadata.larc.nasa.gov/P3.html

More than 3 billion people condemned to premature death from hunger & thirst

Dandelion Salad

By Fidel Castro
ICH
04/13/08 “Granma

THAT is not an exaggerated figure, but rather a cautious one. I have meditated a lot on that in the wake of President Bush’s meeting with U.S. automobile manufacturers.

The sinister idea of converting food into fuel was definitively established as an economic line in U.S. foreign policy last Monday, March 26.

A cable from the AP, the U.S. news agency that reaches all corners of the world, states verbatim:

“WASHINGTON, March 26 (AP). President Bush touted the benefits of ‘flexible fuel’ vehicles running on ethanol and biodiesel on Monday, meeting with automakers to boost support for his energy plans.

“Bush said a commitment by the leaders of the domestic auto industry to double their production of flex-fuel vehicles could help motorists shift away from gasoline and reduce the nation’s reliance on imported oil.

‘“That’s a major technological breakthrough for the country,’ Bush said after inspecting three alternative vehicles. If the nation wants to reduce gasoline use, he said “the consumer has got to be in a position to make a rational choice.”

“The president urged Congress to ‘move expeditiously’ on legislation the administration recently proposed to require the use of 35 billion gallons of alternative fuels by 2017 and seek higher fuel economy standards for automobiles.

“Bush met with General Motors Corp. chairman and chief executive Rick Wagoner, Ford Motor Co. chief executive Alan Mulally and DaimlerChrysler AG’s Chrysler Group chief executive Tom LaSorda.

“They discussed support for flex-fuel vehicles, attempts to develop ethanol from alternative sources like switchgrass and wood chips and the administration’s proposal to reduce gas consumption by 20 percent in 10 years.

“The discussions came amid rising gasoline prices. The latest Lundberg Survey found the nationwide average for gasoline has risen 6 cents per gallon in the past two weeks to $2.61.”

I believe that reducing and moreover recycling all motors that run on electricity and fuel is an elemental and urgent need for all humanity. The tragedy does not lie in reducing those energy costs but in the idea of converting food into fuel.

It is known very precisely today that one ton of corn can only produce 413 liters of ethanol on average, according to densities. That is equivalent to 109 gallons.

The average price of corn in U.S. ports has risen to $167 per ton. Thus, 320 million tons of corn would be required to produce 35 billion gallons of ethanol.

According to FAO figures, the U.S. corn harvest rose to 280.2 million tons in the year 2005.

Although the president is talking of producing fuel derived from grass or wood shavings, anyone can understand that these are phrases totally lacking in realism. Let’s be clear: 35 billion gallons translates into 35 followed by nine zeros!

Afterwards will come beautiful examples of what experienced and well-organized U.S. farmers can achieve in terms of human productivity by hectare: corn converted into ethanol; the chaff from that corn converted into animal feed containing 26% protein; cattle dung used as raw material for gas production. Of course, this is after voluminous investments only within the reach of the most powerful enterprises, in which everything has to be moved on the basis of electricity and fuel consumption. Apply that recipe to the countries of the Third World and you will see that people among the hungry masses of the Earth will no longer eat corn. Or something worse: lend funding to poor countries to produce corn ethanol based on corn or any other food and not a single tree will be left to defend humanity from climate change.

Other countries in the rich world are planning to use not only corn but also wheat, sunflower seeds, rapeseed and other foods for fuel production. For the Europeans, for example, it would become a business to import all of the world’s soybeans with the aim of reducing the fuel costs for their automobiles and feeding their animals with the chaff from that legume, particularly rich in all types of essential amino acids.

In Cuba, alcohol used to be produced as a byproduct of the sugar industry after having made three extractions of sugar from cane juice. Climate change is already affecting our sugar production. Lengthy periods of drought alternating with record rainfall, that barely make it possible to produce sugar with an adequate yield during the 100 days of our very moderate winter; hence, there is less sugar per ton of cane or less cane per hectare due to prolonged drought in the months of planting and cultivation.

I understand that in Venezuela they would be using alcohol not for export but to improve the environmental quality of their own fuel. For that reason, apart from the excellent Brazilian technology for producing alcohol, in Cuba the use of such a technology for the direct production of alcohol from sugar cane juice is no more than a dream or the whim of those carried away by that idea. In our country, land handed over to the direct production of alcohol could be much useful for food production for the people and for environmental protection.

All the countries of the world, rich and poor, without any exception, could save millions and millions of dollars in investment and fuel simply by changing all the incandescent light bulbs for fluorescent ones, an exercise that Cuba has carried out in all homes throughout the country. That would provide a breathing space to resist climate change without killing the poor masses through hunger.

As can be observed, I am not using adjectives to qualify the system and the lords of the earth. That task can be excellently undertaken by news experts and honest social, economic and political scientists abounding in the world who are constantly delving into to the present and future of our species. A computer and the growing number of Internet networks are sufficient for that.

Today, we are seeing for the first time a really globalized economy and a dominant power in the economic, political and military terrain that in no way resembles that of Imperial Rome.

Some people will be asking themselves why I am talking of hunger and thirst. My response to that: it is not about the other side of the coin, but about several sides of something else, like a die with six sides, or a polyhedron with many more sides.

I refer in this case to an official news agency, founded in 1945 and generally well-informed about economic and social questions in the world: TELAM. It said, and I quote:

“In just 18 years, close to 2 billion people will be living in countries and regions where water will be a distant memory. Two-thirds of the world’s population could be living in places where that scarcity produces social and economic tensions of such a magnitude that it could lead nations to wars for the precious ‘blue gold.’

“Over the last 100 years, the use of water has increased at a rate twice as fast as that of population growth.

“According to statistics from the World Water Council, it is estimated that by 2015, the number of inhabitants affected by this grave situation will rise by 3.5 billion people.

“The United Nations celebrated World Water Day on March 23, and called to begin confronting, that very day, the international scarcity of water, under the coordination of the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), with the goal of highlighting the increasing importance of water scarcity on a global scale, and the need for greater integration and cooperation that would make it possible to guarantee sustained and efficient management of water resources.

“Many regions on the planet are suffering from severe water shortages, living with less than 500 cubic meters per person per year. The number of regions suffering from chronic scarcity of this vital element is increasingly growing.

“The principal consequences of water scarcity are an insufficient amount of the precious liquid for producing food, the impossibility of industrial, urban and tourism development and health problems.”

That was the TELEAM cable.

In this case I will refrain from mentioning other important facts, like the melting ice in Greenland and the Antarctic, damage to the ozone layer and the growing volume of mercury in many species of fish for common consumption.

There are other issues that could be addressed, but with these lines I am just trying to comment on President Bush’s meeting with the principal executives of U.S. automakers.

March 28, 2007

Fidel Castro.

Translated by Granma International

FAIR USE NOTICE: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Wanta Save the Economy? Give Workers a Raise By Mike Whitney

Dandelion Salad

By Mike Whitney
04/13/08 “ICH

“The bright new financial system, with all its talented participants, with all its rich rewards, has failed the test of the marketplace.” Former Fed Chief, Paul Volcker

A specter is haunting Wall Street—the specter of insolvency. One major player, Bear Stearns, has already gone under, and from the looks of it, another may be on the way. It’s getting ugly out there. The so-called TED spread—which measures the willingness of banks to lend to each other—has begun to widen ominously suggesting that the money markets believe another body will be floating to the surface any day now.

The ongoing deleveraging of financial institutions and the persistent downgrading of assets has the Fed in a tizzy. Bernanke has backed himself into a corner by stretching the Fed’s mandate to include anyone on Wall Street with a mailing address and a begging bowl. Now he’s taken on the larger task of fixing the plumbing that keeps credit flowing between the various investment banks. Good luck. He’s already burned through nearly half of the Fed’s balance sheet of $900 billion and the banking meltdown has just begun.  The IMF expects the final tally will be $945 billion, that means $3 trillion in lost loans for the banks. Bernanke better pace himself; this mess could last for years.

The US subprime fiasco has spiraled into what the IMF is calling “the largest financial shock since the Great Depression.” America’s capital markets are on the fritz. The corporate bond market is frozen, the banks are buckling from their losses, and the housing market is in a shambles. No one is buying and no one is lending; that’s a deadly combo. Private equity deals are off 75% from last year and no one will go near a mortgage-backed security (MBS) with a ten foot pole. The mighty wheel of modern finance is grinding to a standstill and no one’s quite sure how to rev it up again.

The US consumer is feeling the pinch, too. His credit cards are maxed out, his student loans are overdue, his car payment is in arrears, his mortgage is entering foreclosure, and the home-equity ATM has been shut down. Now that the credit spigot has been turned off; he’s really hurting, but no one is offering him a bailout or a even helping hand; just a few table-scraps from Bush’s “surplus package”. 500 bucks will just about fill the tank of a normal-sized SUV; that’s it. A new survey from the Pew research Center “Inside the Middle Class—Bad Times Hit the Good Life”, shows that working families are in debt up to their ears and that fewer Americans “believe they are moving forward” than anytime in the last half century. The study also shows that most people believe “it’s harder to maintain a middle class life style” and that “since 1999, they have not made economic gains.” Average families are struggling just to make ends meet.

That’s why so many people bought homes when they should have opened savings accounts. They thought that speculating on housing would get them a piece of the American dream. What’s wrong with that? It looked like a good way to make up for the stagnant wages and crappy hours. The cheer-leading TV pundits offered assurances that “housing prices never go down”, but it was all baloney. Now 15 million homeowners are upside-down on their mortgages and the very same experts are scolding them for fudging the facts on their income. It’s all backwards.

No wonder consumer confidence has dropped to record lows. The trust is gone. Working people have been hoodwinked one too many times. They don’t need lectures on saving money; they need a raise. The big-wigs who scuttled Bear Stearns are still dining on crab-cakes at the Four Seasons while the working slob is just trying to make his way through Greenspan’s nuclear winter living on beef jerky and Big Gulps. Where’s the justice?

Volumes have been written about the current crisis; subprime-this, subprime that. Everything that can be said about collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) credit default swaps(CDS) and mortgage-backed securities (MBS) has already been said. Yes, they are exotic “financial innovations” and, no, they are not regulated. But what difference does that make? There’s always been snake oil and there’s always been snake oil salesmen. Greenspan simply raised the bar a notch, but he’s not the first huckster and he won’t be the last. What really matters is underlying ideology; that’s the root from which this economy-busting hydra sprung. 30 years of trickle down, supply-side gibberish; 30 years of idol worship for the waxy-haired reactionary, Ronald Raygun; 30 years of unrelenting anti-labor, free market, deregulated orthodoxy which inflated the biggest equity-Zeppelin in history. Now the bubble has sprung a leak and the escaping gas is wreaking havoc across the planet. There’s food riots in Haiti, Egypt, and Kuwait. Wherever the local currency is pegged to the falling dollar, inflation is soaring and trouble is brewing. Also, European banks are listing from the mortgage-backed garbage they bought from trusted brokerages in the US and need central bank bailouts to stay afloat. It’s just more fallout from the subprime swindle. Finance ministers in every capital in every country are getting ready for a 1930′s-type typhoon that could send equities crashing and food and energy prices rocketing into the stratosphere. And it can all be traced back to the wacko doctrine of unlimited personal accumulation and its evil-spawn, neoliberalism. These are the theories that guide America’s “bugger-thy-neighbor” monetary policies and spread financial turmoil to every city and hamlet around the world.

The present stewards of the system, Paulson and Bernanke, are incapable of fixing the problem because they represent the interests of the people who benefit most from the disruptions. Paulson’s latest “blueprint” for the financial markets just proves the point; a more pro-business, self-serving scheme has never been put to paper. Gary North sums it up in his article “Really Stupid Loans”:

“With the Federal Reserve System’s latest proposal, presented to the public by Secretary of the Treasury Henry “Goldman Sachs” Paulson, the FED is asking the United States government to make it the Great Protector of Capital….The new proposals will centralize power over finance in the hands of an agency that is officially run by the government but in fact is run by agents of the largest fractional reserve banks. …Regulation by tenured staff economists will not make the system less fragile. It will make it more top-heavy and less flexible..

Some version of this plan will probably pass in the next Congress. No matter whether it does or does not, the direction is the same: toward an economy controlled by the federal government in conjunction with titular private ownership of the means of production, that is, toward fascism. (Gary North, “Really Stupid loans” lewrockwell.com)

That’s right; Paulson and his flock of investment bank alchemists, who cooked up the poisonous stew of derivatives that paralyzed the bond market, now want congress to put the whole kit and kabootle under their authority. Right.
Michael S. Rozeff sums it all up his article “ The American Form of Government and the Paulson Plan”:

“The main result of the Paulson Plan will be increased government power over capital markets and their institutions. Certain large players will be cartelized under the enhanced regulatory umbrella. They will be under the government’s thumb. In subsequent crises, the government will move further toward capital controls and find it easier to do so.

To be totalitarian, a State needs to control investment, that is, the allocation of capital. Controlling the direction of finance is a means to control investment. That is the ultimate stopping point of government control over capital markets.” (The American Form of Government and the Paulson Plan, Michael S. Rozeff, lewrockwell.com)

And that’s the whole point, to put the markets in the Fed’s control so when the next financial crisis arises the Fed can bailout the bankers and hedge fund managers without consulting Congress.

Paulson’s plan is a power-play pure and simple. The investment Mafia wants to control the financial system lock, stock and barrel. They want to liquidate the SEC and any other government watchdog agency and put the investment banks, hedge funds and brokerages on the honor system. It’s the end of transparency and accountability which, of course, are in short supply already.

Comrade Paulson’s blueprint fixes nothing. It’s just another freebie for the parasite class. What the country really need is a few honest men who’ll ride-herd on the Ken Lays and Jeffrey Skillings who presently run Wall Street. That doesn’t require centralized power; just a rule book and a bullwhip.

Currently, Paulson and Bernanke are expanding the balance sheets of the GSEs so that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will underwrite 85% of all mortgages while FHA will cover 10% more. The mortgage industry is being nationalized to save banking fellowship while the taxpayer is on the hook for another $4.4 trillion of dodgy loans. It’s a risky business and, once again, it’s all ideologically driven. Paulson doesn’t care if the taxpayer gets stuck with the bill. It’s no skin off his nose. What bothers him is the prospect that, somewhere along the line, workers will demand higher wages to keep pace with inflation. Then all hell will break loose. Paulson and Co. would rather see the economy perish in a deflationary holocaust than add another farthing to a poor man’s salary. He and his ilk take class warfare seriously; that’s why they are winning. But their strategy also creates problems. When wages don’t keep pace with production, demand decreases and the economy falters. That’s what’s happening now and Paulson knows it. Workers are over-extended and can’t buy the things they make. They barely have enough to feed the kids and fill the tank for work. All the fat has been trimmed from the bone; there’s nothing left. The only thing that’s kept us from sliding into recession so far, has been the kookie banker’s scam to maintain growth by easing lending standards and expanding credit. That turned out to be a real doozie; the whole thing blew up and left the banks’ balance sheets ravaged and workers deeper in debt than anytime in history. Now consumer spending is nosediving at the same time the Fed’s equity bubble is plummeting to earth. It looks like the plan to eliminate the standard criteria for lending money wasn’t such a great idea after all. The global financial system has never been under greater strain.

Was it all part of a “vast right-wing conspiracy?”

Maybe or maybe not; it’s hard to say. But neoliberalism does have a twenty-year record of producing the very same economic calamities. That’s more than just a coincidence. What makes this crisis so different? The bankster globalists aren’t bound by any silly feelings of patriotism. They would just as soon march the good old USA to the chopping block as any other unsuspecting nation; it makes no difference to them. It’s just business as usual.  After the equity bubble bursts and asset prices fall, the corporate vultures will swoop down and buy up vital resources and industries for pennies on the dollar. Its the same everywhere; Darwinian capitalism. Leave nothing but the bones behind.

Economist Michael Hudson anticipated many of the present-day developments in the financial markets in an amazingly prescient interview in counterpunch in 2003 called “The Coming Financial Reality”:

Michael Hudson: “Free enterprise under today’s financial conditions threatens to bring about an unprecedented centralization of planning, not in the hands of government but by the financial conglomerates and money managers. Whatever government planning power is destroyed becomes available for them to appropriate, with plenty of vigorish left for the politicians whose campaigns they back and who will “descend from heaven” into high-paying private-sector jobs, Japanese style, after having performed their service for the new regime.

Question; Standard Schaefer: The financial regime is nothing but parasites?

Michael Hudson: “The problem with parasites is not merely that they siphon off the food and nourishment of their host, crippling its reproductive power, but that they take over the host’s brain as well. The parasite tricks the host into thinking that it is feeding itself.
Something like this is happening today as the financial sector is devouring the industrial sector. Finance capital pretends that its growth is that of industrial capital formation. That is why the financial bubble is called “wealth creation,” as if it were what progressive economic reformers envisioned a century ago. They condemned rent and monopoly profit, but never dreamed that the financiers would end up devouring landlord and industrialist alike. Emperors of Finance have trumped Barons of Property and Captains of Industry.” (Michael Hudson, “The Coming Financial Reality”, counterpunch)

Bingo. Hudson not only explains how finance capitalism is inserting itself into the governmental power structure but, also, predicts that “industrial capital formation”–which is the production of things that people can really use to improve their lives—will be replaced with complex debt-instruments and derivatives that add no tangible value to people’s lives and merely serve to expand the wealth of an entrenched and increasingly powerful investor class.

Finance capitalism has “devoured landlord and industrialist alike” and created a galaxy of seductive liabilities which masquerade as assets. Derivatives contracts, for example, represent over $500 trillion of unregulated counterparty transactions; a “shadow banking system” completely disconnected from the underlying “real” economy, but large enough to send the world into a agonizing depression for years to come.

The goal of liberals should be to dismantle this corrupt Ponzi-system, which merely wraps debt in a ribbon, and rebuild the economy on a solid foundation of productive labor, worker solidarity and the making of tradable goods. That will restore competitiveness and reallign the political system.

Political power has to be taken from the financial mandarins or the disparity of wealth will continue to grow and democracy will wither. We’ve already seen our main institutions— the courts, the congress, the media, and the presidency—polluted by the steady flow of corporate contributions which only serve the narrow interests of elites.

Henry Liu expands on this idea in his excellent article “A Panic-stricken Federal Reserve”:

“In the 1920s, the wide disparity of wealth between the rich and the average wage earner increased the vulnerability of the economy. For an economy to function with stability on a macro scale, total demand needs to equal total supply. Disparity of income eventually will result in demand deficiency, causing over supply. The extension of credit to consumers can extend the supply/demand imbalance but if credit is extended beyond the ability of income to sustain, a debt bubble will result that will inevitably burst with economic pain that can only be relieved by inflation…..More investment normally increases productivity. However, if the rewards of the increased productivity are not distributed fairly to workers, production will soon outpace demand. The search for high returns in a low demand market will lead to consumer debt bubbles with wide-spread speculation….Today, outstanding consumer credit besides home mortgages adds up to about $14 trillion, about the same as the annual GDP. ”

Voila. A strong economy requires a strong workforce and an equitable distribution of wealth. Otherwise, demand decreases and growth slows to a crawl. When money is concentrated in too few hands, the political system atrophies and becomes unresponsive to the needs of its people. That’s when the nation’s laws and institutions are reshaped to reflect the ambitions of rich and powerful.

Liu continues:

“A 2002 study released by Citizens for Tax Justice and the Children’s Defense Fund reveals that under the Bush tax cut, over the next 10 years, the top 1% income recipients are slated to receive tax cuts totaling almost half a trillion dollars. The $477 billion in tax breaks the Bush administration has targeted to this elite group will average $342,000 each over the decade. By 2010, when (and if) the Bush tax reductions are fully in place, an astonishing 52% of the total tax cuts will go to the richest 1% whose average 2010 income will be $1.5 million.” And, this; “In 2006, the chief executives of the 500 biggest US companies averaged $15.2 million in total annual compensation, according to Forbes business magazine’s annual executive pay survey. The top eight CEOs on the Forbes list each pocketed over $100 million.” “A Panic-stricken Federal Reserve; The shape of US Populism” Henry C. K. Liu, Asia Times)

The financial system is doing exactly what it was designed to do, it is crumbling from the decades-long trickle-down experiment. Social programs have been gutted, civil infrastructure is in tatters, legal protections have been savaged, and workers rights have been trounced. Is it any wonder why we’re embroiled in an unwinnable war and the financial system is on its last legs?

None of this is accidental; it is the inevitable decline of a fatally flawed ideology; the Golden Calf of neoliberalism. But what will take its place? Where are the leaders who will fill the vacuum?

Here’s an excerpt from Bernard Chazelle’s article “Saving the American Left; A New Progressive Creed”:

“By virtually any measure, the United States is the least progressive nation in the developed world. It trails most of Western Europe in poverty rates, life expectancy, health care, child care, infant mortality, maternity leaves, paid vacations, public infrastructure, incarceration rates, and environmental laws. The wealth gap in the US has not been so wide since 1929. The Wal-Mart founders’ family owns as much as the bottom 120 million Americans combined. Contrary to received opinion, there is now less social mobility in the US than in Canada, France, Germany, and most Scandinavian countries. The European Union attracts more foreign students than the US, including twice as many from China. Its consensus-driven polity, studies indicate, has replaced the American version as the societal model to which the developing world aspires.”

America has lost its luster; it no longer attracts freedom-loving young people seeking openness and a brighter future. There are better opportunities elsewhere and less hassle. The country needs a major face-lift. Restoring liberal values is pointless without a strong commitment to economic justice; the two are inseparable. The only way to break the stranglehold of Wall Street’s financial Politburo is to level the playing field through greater wealth distribution. That’s the best way to rekindle democracy and make America the land of opportunity again. And it all starts with giving America’s workers a raise.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Pope to tell Bush to spend less on war: Bush to tell Pope he’s an Islamofascist by R J Shulman (satire)

Welcome to my latest featured writer, Robert. Hope you enjoy his humor as much as I do. ~ Lo

Robert

by R J Shulman
Dandelion Salad
featured writer
Robert’s blog post
April 13, 2008

Pope to tell Bush to spend less on war: Bush to tell Pope he’s an Islamofascist

WASHINGTON – In his visit to the United States next week, Pope Benedict XVI has indicated he will tell President Bush he hopes the US will spend less on the war and more to help the poor. “If he asks me,” the President told the Post Times Sun Dispatch, “to waste our money on poor folks who want to be poor instead of wasting it on our noble cause to fight Democracy and spread the global war on terror, then I’ll have no choice but to tell him he is an Isamofascist and a Communist to boot.” “That will essentially be the President’s message,’ said Presidential Press Secretary Dana Perino, “except he will say we should fight the war on terror and spread democracy, not the other way around.”

“Hasn’t anyone told the Pope that Kennedy isn’t the President anymore?” said Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. “This President gets his orders from a different God, a God who is bigger and more full of shock and awe than anyone else’s God.” “Actually, I look forward to the Pope’s visit, as I will expedite the opportunity for him to enlighten us first hand,” said Vice President Dick Cheney, “as to whether waterboarding is really torture.”

The Pope will visit New York and Washington in his first visit to the United States since becoming Pope three years ago. “At first I thought we should let the Pope visit America,” said Senator John McCain, “but now that I am a true conservative, I believe we should build a fence around the country to keep this subversive German foreigner out as he seems to have forgotten the true meaning of ‘onward Christian soldier.’”

Garden Girl TV: Vertical Gardening + City Vineyards

Dandelion Salad

GardenGirltv

Patti shows you more innovative ways to vertical garden. Check out her website at 
http://www.gardengirltv.com/

City Vinyards

Patti, the Garden Girl, shows you how easy it is to grow grapes in the city.

see

NightShades: Potato and Tomato (video)

Lasagna Gardening by Patricia Lanza (1999)

Gardening

Rich vs Right by The Other Katherine Harris

The Other Katherine Harris

by The Other Katherine Harris
Featured writer
Dandelion Salad

The Other Katherine Harris’s blog
April 13, 2008

It’s become fashionable to rail about how dumb Americans are – and, yes, we do tend to share some collective impairments (notably in world geography and languages) – but I’m struck again and again by the collective wisdom of my compatriots.

I often learn more from comments on a blog than from the original essayist, even if highly credentialed, and some who call talk show hosts on AirAmerica and NovaM reveal similarly transcendent insight. Radio being such an ephemeral medium, I can’t attribute this remark to a particular speaker or even recall precisely what show was airing, but here are perhaps the pithiest words ever spoken about our nation’s partisan disjuncture: “Republicans want to get rich and Democrats want to be right.”

That nails it in one, doesn’t it?

For some, personal gain is quite simply the highest value. We on the other side find this hard to believe – but it’s demonstrably clear that we’ll never win an argument with them, by appealing to their better nature. It isn’t that they don’t possess a better nature, but it’s kept firmly in its place, restricted to benefiting kith, kin and self-aggrandizing philanthropies. The only occasions on which they’ve ceded any advantage on a broad basis have been when they’d weakened the rest us so much that they’d effectively killed the Golden Goose, so had to fatten it up for a while. (Think Great Depression, for instance.)

By contrast, those of the greed contingent have grasped that the majority of people honestly place principle ahead of wealth. That makes us suckers, in their book, and they’ve managed to play us like suckers by mincing it up – extolling a few token precepts to gain followers. Mind you, these have no bearing on their all-important financial aims. Trumpeting biblical strictures costs them nothing and fools believers into thinking they also buy into the rest of the doctrine (those icky parts about service to others, fairness, peace and the spiritual perils of privilege). Likewise, it costs them nothing to bray about “the right to bear arms” and fools believers into thinking they also buy into the rest of the Constitution (those icky parts about governmental checks and balances, restrictions on war-mongering, even-handed justice and the primacy of individual freedom and conscience).

Thus, our would-be Masters of the Universe have exploited their fellow-citizens ideologically, as well as economically. In high political circles, it’s now considered bad form to point this out, but Barack Obama has been doing it – more gracefully when he spoke of our need to unite against the real enemy than when he spoke specifically of impoverished Americans clinging to God and Guns. In each case, however, he was expressing essentially the same thought. I’d like to see him broaden it to embrace these people as persons of principle, who were deliberately misled by being tossed a scrap of what they value. There’s a great affinity waiting to be tapped into, in that they placed something higher than their own pecuniary best-interest – which you’ll never see a True Republican do.

U.S. May Not Release Guantanamo Prisoners: Even If Found Innocent of Charges Against Them

Dandelion Salad

by Sherwood Ross
Global Research, April 12, 2008

Even if a Guantanamo prisoner is acquitted on all counts at his trial, the Pentagon may still not release him on grounds he might return to the battlefield, according to an article in the April 14th issue of The New Yorker.

The magazine’s Jeffrey Toobin quotes Brig. General Thomas Hartmann, legal adviser to the Pentagon’s Office of Military Commissions, as saying, “What’s unusual about what we’re doing is that we’re having the commissions before the end of the war. The Nuremberg trials (of accused Nazi war criminals) were after World War Two, so there was no possibility of the defendants going back to the battlefield.”

But, Hartmann continued, “We still have that problem. We are trying these alleged war criminals during the war. So, in order to protect our troops in the field, in general we are not going to release anyone who poses a danger until the war is over.”

By this reasoning, Toobin writes, “even those Guantanamo detainees who are acquitted of the charges against them are analogous to Nazi war criminals.”

Curiously, hundreds of Guantanamo prisoners — once depicted by former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld as “the worst of a very bad lot” — have already been released. This raises the suspicion they were innocent victims of dragnet arrests or sold to the U.S. by Afghan bounty hunters to enlarge the picture of thousands of Islamist terrorists seething to attack America. As historian James Carroll put it in “House of War” (Houghton Mifflin), the jails of Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo are “emblems of a new system of legally dubious incarceration that involved more than eleven thousand detainees held in mostly secret (black site) locations around the world…”

As Clive Stafford Smith, a detainees’ lawyer, told The New Yorker: “Now that it’s clear that Guantanamo is such an embarrassment, they are just shipping as many of them (captives) out the door as they can, and just keeping enough of them to save face. It’s a political process that has little to do with terrorism.”

Only one prisoner since Gitmo first opened on January 11, 2002 — ex-kangaroo skinner David Hicks—has been actually brought to trial. He plea-bargained a nine-month term which he served out in his native Australia and is now free.

About 275 prisoners remain in Gitmo, down from an estimated peak of 680 from 43 countries. According to Toobin, about 60 have been approved for transfer, if countries can be found to take them, and Hartmann anticipates there is sufficient evidence to bring commission trials against only 80. “In sum,” Toobin writes, “there are more than 130 detainees for whom Administration officials acknowledge they have no plan, except indefinite detention without trial.” Toobin’s article is titled “Camp Justice.”

After years of delay, a trial was actually scheduled to open May 5th against Omar Ahmed Khadr, a Canadian who was 15 years of age when detained on charges of hurling a hand grenade that killed an American GI. According to The New York Times of April 12, military judge Col. Peter Brownback III, pushed back his trial date and instead set May 8th to hear more lawyers’ arguments on pre-trial issues. Khadr’s lead lawyer, Navy Lt. Comdr. William Kuebler, is quoted as saying, “I don’t believe anyone can get an acquittal at Guantanamo Bay.” He said some witnesses to the firefight say the U.S. soldier may have been killed by friendly fire — a charge Khadr’s prosecutor claims will be disproved.

Yet what does it matter? Even if proved innocent before his all-military panel, Khadr could be held as long as the occupant of the White House says the War on Terror continues! For many in the Middle East and elsewhere, the legalized duplicity shaping up at Gitmo won’t just give America one black eye but two, plus a broken nose, a fat lip, and a mouthful of loose teeth — as George Bush whacks away at the Statue of Liberty with his war club.

Sherwood Ross is a Miami, Fl.-based writer and public relations consultant that may be reached at sherwoodr1 [at] yahoo [dot] com. Ross has worked as a reporter for the Chicago Daily News and contributed a weekly “Workplace” column to Reuters America for 10 years.

The CRG grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified. The source and the author’s copyright must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: crgeditor@yahoo.com

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: crgeditor@yahoo.com
© Copyright Sherwood Ross, Global Research, 2008
The url address of this article is: www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8664

A-Z of Bushcraft: Edible wild plants (video; 2007; UK)

Dandelion Salad

undercurrentspaulo

Added: April 17, 2007

A new series about survival and enjoying the great outdoors. We show what to eat on the beach, in hedges and the woods.

Filmed in South Wales, UK. Series coming soon on Visionontv.net

from www.youtube.com posted with vodpod

.

h/t: Organic

Middle East Conflict: No Middle Ground By Liam Bailey

Liam

By Liam Bailey
featured writer
Dandelion Salad

The Bailey Mail
April 13, 2008

2008-04-10 20:51:13 **opinion**

The Israel-Palestine conflict is one of the greatest injustices in the history of mankind. Middle East Conflict: No middle ground is my outlet to release my true feelings on the matter, and hopefully achieve readership wide enough to educate some people of the up-coming generations who might be able to do something about it.

This was originally going to be the first part of a series covering all the apparently unsolvable issues in the conflict, but I was out walking and thinking, and now it is going to be an opinion piece, about Israel’s government not wanting peace, what they do want, and their strategies for making sure they get it.

Download (right click, save target as) Middle East Conflict: No Middle Ground as a PDF ebook.

Mistaken Perceptions of Israel’s Intentions:

In the Israel-Palestine conflict, Israel is perceived as the good guy, it is assumed the all Israel’s violent acts are in self-defence and that all Israel wants is peace.

Meanwhile the Palestinians are seen as the bad guys, and while some, the so called moderates are portrayed in a better light, it is generally perceived that the Palestinian’s main cause is to wipe Israel off the map.

All the above perceptions exist because that is the way Israel wants it, and Jewish lobby groups around the world make sure the view is carried around the world. This is an aim helped by the fact that every U.S. President must be pro-Israel to get ahead, and especially by the current truly pro-Israel President, who has become a squawking box for Israeli lies. Bush is not necessarily taken in by them, but pushes them because the mis-conceptions Israel wants to become reality about the Palestinians, tie in with the U.S’ desire to maintain global fear of Islamic terrorism, allowing them to invade oil rich countries, like Iraq and Iran.

What Israel Really Wants:

  • To make sure the world continues to believe their main desire is for two states coexisting in peace.
  • To maintain the global perception that they are in genuine fear for the existence of Israel and any barbaric acts and contraventions of international law are acceptable in self defence.
  • All with the overall aim: to maintain Jewish predominance and supremacy in the territory currently belonging to them, and to take possession of further land including all of Jerusalem by any means necessary. Currently the favoured method is settlement building, and forced evictions with trumped up charges on incorrect building permits, as these methods attracts less international resentment.

On top of that there is the millions of dollars in U.S. military aid to Israel in its constant state of attack, which Israel would surely lose a hefty chunk of should a peace deal be reached.

Israel’s Methods for Achieving its Aims:

To ensure success in their aims Israel must keep provoking the Palestinians: by causing internal rivalry and violence, and if Palestinian violence towards Israel lulls, by launching (perfectly acceptable to the international community) arrest raids. Both of course, alongside constant provocations like the wall and the Gaza blockade, which also causes exacerbation and desperation within Palestinians, as well as removing their will to live, thus causing continual desperation fuelled violence and possibly even further suicide attacks.

Closing Statement:

So, as I have said before, and I will say again, until the world realises that it cannot be assumed that all Israel’s intentions are completely honourable and based on a desire to find peace, and the Israeli engineered misconceptions stop being treated as fact by U.S. administrations, in short until the conflict stops being viewed in a pro-Israel light by U.S. administrations, there will be no peace, no middle ground.

Fasting for impeachment “The Southfield/12 Mile situation”

Dandelion Salad

Reposted with permission by Impeach. Fast. Check out his blog: Impeach. Fast. ~ Lo

by Erox
April 8, 2008

Since I handed off my fast to local members of Code Pink, I have been in a nearly constant state of protest. Each morning from 8 to 9, I continue to stand in front of Conyers’ office although I respect his request that I no longer go up to talk to his people.

Each evening before teaching night school, I take my banner to a footbridge over I-696. Unlike residents of Livonia, people in Southfield can apparently read a single word while driving without having to slow down or run off the road, so police have yet to ticket me for this activity.

EROX07

Added: February 21, 2008
When you’re fasting in support of impeachment, here’s what you do with your lunch hour.

And in between, I demonstrate at the intersection of 12 mile and Southfield roads during my lunch hour. I stand facing the traffic coming through the left turn lane. When the light changes, I quickly cross half way then turn to show my sign to people making a right turn. Once they have passed, I continue to walk backwards appealing to oncoming traffic. By the time I get to the other side, the lights have changed and I repeat the process. I figure at least 100 people see the sign every time I do a lap.

Police have been summoned 3 times so far because of reports that someone was dodging cars and running around in traffic. The last time they were called was almost comical. The crossroads lies on the border of Southfield and the upscale burrough of Lathrup. Officers from both jurisdictions came out simultaneously. The Southfield officer stopped his car in the right turn lane opposite the corner I was on while the Lathrup officer talked to him through the window. When I crossed the street to face cars turning left again, he shouted out to me “Stay there! I’ll come to you!”

“Why would I cross?” I thought. “The light hasn’t changed yet.” Just then, the Lathrup officer dashed through traffic to get to me. I could decide which was more unbelievable: What I just saw or what I was about to hear.

“We got calls that you were standing in front of cars as they were about to make a left turn.”

“How is that possible?” I asked. “Every time someone is making a left turn, I’m on the corner directly across from them so they can read my sign.”

“I just saw you standing in front of the left turn lane over there.” Said the Southfield officer who had come around and parked behind my car. “If that light changed, he would have run you over.”

“The light was red.” I politely reminded him. “If he ran me over, he would have driven into traffic.”

“Cross the street as quickly as you can.” The Lathrup cop joined back in. “This is the third time we’ve been called out here. If I get called again, I’ll have to write you a ticket.”

“Tell you what, officer. How about the next time you get called, you wait until you see me do something illegal. Then you can write me a ticket. For that matter, you’re welcome to stay and wait until I break the law.”

“Next time we come out, we’ll have to arrest you.” threatened the Southfield constable.

“Please, officer.” I tried to reason with him. “I am trying reach as many people as possible while very deliberately obeying the letter of the law. I don’t want you to have to come out here any more than you want to come back, but I’m not going to surrender my first amendment right because it inconveniences you.”

He got back into his cruiser and drove off while the other stayed behind to get info from me. I told him my name, address and phone number. “Do you have a drivers license?”

“No.” When police returned my personal effects they took from my car during a warrantless search, it slipped between the dashboard and the firewall.

“Where are you parked?” I looked at my car 10 feet away as I considered his question. “I asked you a question.” I decided not to help him give me a ticket.

“I walked.”

Satisfied he’d done all he could or frustrated that he could do no more, the policeman left. I waited on the corner, showing my sign to cars making their left turn as he stood on the curb about to dart back out. “Whoa! Whoa! The light hasn’t changed, man.”

“It’s alright. We can do this when we’re on a call.”

I guess irony is just wasted on some.

***

When someone tells me what to do, first I do as they say, then I do what they say in an exaggerated, sarcastic fashion. Then, if they’re still not satisfied, I ignore them completely since I have demonstrated that I cannot complete this task to their satisfaction. I Friday, I moved on to phase two. A ridiculous adherence to direction.

I stood at the corner, facing the left turning cars as usual. But then, when the light changed, I ran as fast as I could across the street, much to fast for a man in a suit. My sign flapped along side me as I dashed with my arms out, racing the first car in line to the other side. I hit the cross walk button and stood at attention again on the other corner catching my breath. The fans seem to appreciate the hustle, people who might otherwise ignore me wonder what my hurry is. Best of all, whoever called the police before will have to find something else to complain about. I am clearly no longer impeding traffic. And of course they do.

“Do you have permission to have that sign up there?” asked a man who’d parked his car in a driveway up the road.

“I beg your pardon?”

“That sign. Did the church give you permission to put that on their fence?”

“I’m afraid you’ll have to ask the church about that.

“I will.”

And he does. For a few minutes, I am left to my work. But soon enough, he comes back.

“I talked to the people inside and they said they didn’t give you permission to have that there.”

“OK”

“So if you don’t take it down, they’re going to send someone out to take it down.”

“OK. Thanks. Buh bye.”

After another hour on the corner, no one came out of the church to complain about the sign. Funny. Do you think people who worships a man who was tortured and murdered by the military to quell religious dissent would favor impeaching the current administration?

God. I’d hope so.

UPDATE

I return Monday to follow the orders of police to the letter. On my first mad dash across Southfield road, I drop my wallet. The guy behind the wheel of the car in the left turn lane alerts me with a friendly toot on his horn. I turn quickly, pick up my billfold, give the driver a grateful wave and sprint back to the corner to take my position.

As if on cue, the Lathrup police officer appears at the spot I just left on a motorcycle. He gets on his bullhorn and announces “THIS IS NOT A GAME! STOP PLAYING IN THE STREET! PICK A CORNER AND STAY THERE!”

I wave my wallet and try to tell him why I ran back into the intersection, but he’s too far away and he’s not listening anyway. Still, he elects not to ticket me as he had threatened the week before and rides off. Other officers drive by in cruisers, but do not speak to me. I suspect this is the last contact I’ll have with the city, but I am mistaken.

This morning, I take the day off work and decide to spend a little extra time at the courthouse. I renewed the demonstration permit and requested the right to picket on any side of the building and to have up to 10 people join me if they wish (hint, hint, hint). A man walking by says “You really get around, don’t you?” I think he means that I’m on the other side of the building, but then he says, “The cops yellin’ at you on his bullhorn. Did you get your cellphone back?”

I laugh. “It was my wallet, but yeah. I got it. Thanks.”

When I returned to the intersection, the church’s maintenance man finally comes out. He tells me I’ll have to take the sign down. I ask if there is someone I can appeal to in the church and he tells me it’s not likely since they would want to maintain a separation of church and state and besides, the city has told them to keep signs off of their own fence.

As we cross the street back towards the church grounds, we notice a man in plain clothes and a badge on his hip. It is Southfield code enforcement. He’s calling the number on the bottom. I’m glad McCotter doesn’t get to hear about this from me for once.

We have a very pleasant and lengthy conversation about signage as my banner flaps in the breeze behind us. He doesn’t ticket me. He doesn’t put me in the back of a car. I ask him what the rules are, he calls someone at city hall and finds out. It was kind of like being back in civilization, not Livonia. He tells me there are three criteria I must meet:

The sign must be secured on private property.
I must get permission from the property owner.
The sign can be no more than 32 square feet.

Looks like I’ve got some more ground to cover.

***

Wexler Wants Hearings For Impeachment!

Impeach Bush and Cheney!

Photo by Lo

see

Impeach

Letter to Hillary about Monsanto connections (02.03.08)

Dandelion Salad

by Linn Cohen-Cole
Speaking Truth to Power
Sunday, 03 February 2008

Original post: An Open Letter To Hillary Clinton From A Wellesley College Alumna

Submitted by a Truth To Power Subscriber From Yahoo News Groups

[This letter was written by a woman who has clearly done her homework, and confirms that no sane human being in good conscience can cast a vote for Hillary Clinton--CB]

Dear Hillary,

By polling logic, I should be your supporter – Democrat, older woman, white, liberal. I was even in a dorm with you in college. I have pulled for you for years. But something this past summer fundamentally changed my responsibility to my children and grandchildren. In the time I have left in my life to protect them and others, I need to speak out.

I saw a News Hour piece on Maharastra, India, about farmers committing suicide. Monsanto, a US agricultural giant, hired Bollywood actors for ads telling illiterate farmers they could get rich (by their standards) from big yields with Monsanto’s Bt (genetically engineered) cotton seeds. The expensive seeds needed expensive fertilizer and pesticides (Monsanto, again) and irrigation. There is no irrigation there. Crops failed. Farmers had larger debt than they’d ever experienced.

And farmers couldn’t collect seeds from their own fields to try again (true since time immemorial). Monsanto “patents” their DNA-altered seeds as “intellectual property.” They have a $10 million budget and a staff of 75 devoted solely to prosecuting farmers.
http://www.grist.org/comments/food/2008/01/17./
). Since the late 1990s (about when industrial agriculture took hold in India),166,000 Indian farmers have committed suicide and 8 million have left the land.

Farmers in Europe, Asia, Africa, Indonesia,South America, Central America and here, have protested Monsanto and genetic engineering for years.

What does this have to do with you?

You have connections to Monsanto through the Rose Law Firm where you worked and through Bill who hired Monsanto people for central food-related roles. Your Orwellian-named “Rural Americans for Hillary” was planned with Troutman Sanders, Monsanto’s lobbyists.

Genetic engineering and industrialized food and animal production all come together at the Rose Law Firm, which represents the world’s largest GE corporation (Monsanto), GE’s most controversial project (DP&L’s – now Monsanto’s – terminator genes), the world’s largest meat producer (Tyson), the world’s largest retailer and a dominant food retailer (Walmart).

The inbred-ness of Rose’s legal representation of corporations which own controlling interests in other corporations there and of corporate boards sharing members who are also shareholders of each other’s corporations there, is so thorough that it is hard to capture. Jon Jacoby, senior executive of the Stephens Group – one of the largest institutional shareholders of Tyson Foods, Walmart, DP&L -is also Chairman of the Board of DP&L and arranged the Wal-Mart deal. Jackson Stephens’ Stephens Group staked Sam Walton and financed Tyson Foods. Monsanto bought DP&L. All represented at Rose.

You didn’t just work there, you made friends. That shows in the flow of favors then and since. You were invited onto Walmart’s board, you were helped by a Tyson executive to make commodity trades (3 days before Bill became governor), netting you $100,000, Jackson Stephens strongly backed Bill for Governor, and then for President (donating $100,000).

Food and friends, in Clinton terms:

Bill’s appointed friend Mike Espy, Secretary of Agriculture, who immediately significantly weakened federal chicken waste and contamination standards, opening the door to major expansion of Tyson’s chicken factory farms. Espy resigned, indicted for accepting bribes, illegal contributions, money laundering, illegal dispersal of USDA subsidies, …. Tyson Foods was the largest corporate offender.

But what Bill did for Monsanto “genetic engineering” goes beyond inadequate concepts of giving corporate friends influence: He unleashed genetic engineering into the world. And then he helped close off people’s escape from it.

Genetic engineering is many orders of magnitude different from “normal” (even polluting) business in its potential biologic ramifications. The warning myth of Pandora’a Box – letting irretrievable things rush out into nature – has become real. The harrowing change to the world from nuclear fission and fusion is the closest parallel.

What did Bill do?

1. Bill’s put Monsanto people in at the FDA, as US Agricultural Trade Representatives, on International Biotechnology Consultive Forums, and more … (
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines/72600-03.htm
) or
http://www.monitor.net/monitor/904b/monsantofda.html
or

http://www.mindfully.org/GE/Revolving-Door.htm

2. Bill’s FDA gave Monsanto permission to market rBGH (a GE bovine growth hormone), the first genetically engineered product let loose on us (or did tomatoes with fish DNA get there first?).

3. Despite reports of bovine illness and death, Bill’s FDA did not recall it or put warnings on it. Even “a very angry, very vocal nationwide consumer base” had no impact.”

4. Bill’s FDA wouldn’t even label rBGH as “present” in milk.

5. When dairy farmers tried to label their own milk rBGH-free so the public could choose, Bill’s USDA threatened all dairies that their products could be confiscated from stores. Michael Taylor, USFDA Deputy Commissioner, was formerly Monsanto’s counsel.

6. How were consumers to protect their family, given Bill’s FDA enforced public blindness, except to buy only organic? But Bill’s FDA tried to close off that last escape, proposing to include in “organic” standards, “the dirty three” a : genetic engineering of plants and animals, use of irradiation in food processing and use of municipal sewage sludge as a fertilizer. (My emphasis.) The FDA backed down.

Had this gone through, Monsanto could have finally labeled rBGH milk … as “organic.” And animal waste from factory farms, a pollution nightmare for Tyson and others, could have been sold as fertilizer.

USDA head Dan Glickman: “This is probably the largest public response to an [Agriculture Department] rule in modern history.” In fact the response was 20 times greater than anything ever before proposed by the USDA.

Personally, I resent years of effort to protect my children and now grandchildren, from that crap.

Politically, Bill sided against small farmers and against the public’s right to know, and with Monsanto.

A snap shot of our food:

Oils: Sheep died in India after feeding on Bt cotton fields. We feed our children Bt cotton, as cottonseed oil in peanut butter and cookies.

Grains: 49% of US corn acreage was planted in Bt corn in 2007. A French study proved Monsanto’s GMO corn causes kidney and liver toxicity.

Soft drinks and candy have highly concentrated Bt corn, in the form of high fructose Bt corn syrup. The US food system depends most on two crops, soy (90% GMO, 90% of traits owned by Monsanto) and corn, the largest crop (60% GMO, nearly 100% Monsanto traits). “[E]ssentially our entire food supply is genetically modified, to the benefit of one company.” The Grocery Manufacturers of America in 2000 estimated that 70 percent of US food contains GM traits.

Meat: Steroids bulk up athletes. Monsanto steroids bulk up animals – more weight, more profit. We feed our children steroids in meats. Is this why our children are fattening, like Hansel and Gretel?

Poultry: Bill’s USDA weakened chicken waste and contamination standards and attempted to allow sewage sludge as fertilize crops. I will say more about disease from industrialized poultry farms waste, at the end of this letter.

Milk: Over 30 scientific publications have shown increased levels of IGF-1 in milk with rBGH increases risks of breast cancer by up to seven-fold, also increasing colon and prostate cancers risks. Canada, 29 European nations, Norway, Switzerland, Japan, New Zealand, Australia, and South Africa ban U.S. rBGH dairy products. Bill’s USFDA put no restrictions, no warning labels (not allowing labels at all). (My emphasis.)

American children eat that food and drink that milk, Hillary. Coincidentally, American children are increasingly fat and sick.

Here, Bill ignored pleas for labeling. Abroad, Bill ignored intense international objections over the same issue – unlabeled US food exports – badly straining trading relations. Monsanto’s “good ole boy,” he betrayed American families at the deepest levels conceivable – their family’s health and their democratic right to know. He betrayed our rural life and American family farmers – backing corporation deceit and control, over honesty and clean farming.

But, Hillary, it is one thing to not label a regular ole food product to sell it, and quite another to sell a suspected-dangerous food product (rBGH), but Bill’s administration didn’t label (or stop) a well-known, terrifying threat – Mad Cow Disease.

Bill’s FDA’s August, 1997 regulation permitted “known TSE-positive [Transmissible spongiform encephalopathy] material to be used in pet food, pig, chicken and fish feed,” only requiring the label to read “Do not feed to cattle and other ruminants” in the US.

Monsanto added to the problem. “There is evidence that rbST use [Monsanto's GE bovine growth hormone] reduces the useful lifespan of a dairy cow. … Given that the incubation period for BSE is at least three to five years and perhaps longer, rbST-treated cows could harbor “hidden” BSE. That is, they might be infected but still asymptomatic when sent to slaughter.” (My emphasis.)
http://www.consumersunion.org/food/bgh-codex.htm

Bill let TSE into our entire food chain. And who owned the feed and slaughter and genetic engineering corporations which benefited?

Please, tell me, Hillary, what he could possibly have gotten in friendship or favors, that could ever justify his exposing millions of people to this?

With genetic engineering itself, Bill did something to the whole world, which tried to object. Words are inadequate to express how astoundingly immoral, beyond human bounds and conceit and power, that was.

“Even for the biggest “winners,” it is like winning at poker on the Titanic.” Jerry Mander: Facing the Rising Tide

He had no right.

Do you hear that?

Bill had sex from Monica Lewinsky. That’s “dinky immoral.” That’s chicken feed immoral – excuse the Tyson pun, excuse the TSE-laced pun. Bill let genetic engineering lose on NATURE itself.

“Our way of life is likely to be more fundamentally transformed in the next several decades than in the previous one thousand years…Tens of thousands of novel transgenic bacteria, viruses, plants and animals could be released into the Earth’s ecosystems…Some of those releases, however, could wreak havoc with the planet’s biospheres.” Jeremy Rifkin, Biotech Century

Bill did this to us, like it was some nothing and he, some big dumb ass Southern boy, just smiling and getting in good with the Big Boys, thinking about as much about the consequences of something this immense and about us human beings out here, as he thought about you, when he was unfaithful with Monica. Just one big fool getting off on the power and used to getting away with things.

Terminator genes, developed by DP&L, a Rose Firm client, prevent seeds from “working” after only one season. Farmers “must” repurchase (patents and suing not certain enough control, it seems). Those “killing” genes pose the apocalyptic risk of breaking out into nature. Natural seeds could fail, too. Nature could fail.

Far-fetched?

GMO fields are already contaminating normal species Berkeley Professor of Microbiology, Ignacio Chapela, wrote an open letter, warning the Mexican government about just this breaking out phenomenon happening in maize

And it has already happened with weeds – pesticide resistant GMO seeds break lose and weeds become pesticide-resistant Superweeds.

But Bill’s USDA spokesman, Willard Phelps said the USDA wanted the technology to be `widely licensed and made expeditiously available to many seed companies.’

“Genetic Engineering is often justified as a human technology, one that feeds more people with better food. Nothing could be further from the truth. With very few exceptions, the whole point of genetic engineering is to increase sales of chemicals and bio-engineered products to dependent farmers.” David Ehrenfield: Professor of Biology, Rutgers University

Hillary, one third of the world’s bee colonies have collapsed. Gone. Farmers in India are killing themselves. Farmers and bees. Since organic farmers in India are fine and organic farmers report no colony collapse, what does these farming catastrophes say about “industrial agriculture”?

Mad Cow Disease is another direct result of industrial agriculture. And now ……. transnational poultry factories are implicated as the source of bird flu. … Small scale poultry farms and wild birds seem not to be the problem [just as small farmers are not the issue in Mad Cow Disease], and yet “initiatives are multiplying to ban outdoor poultry, squeeze out small producers and restock farms with genetically modified chickens. …
http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/feb2006/2006-02-27-01.asp

“Of the few outbreaks that did occur in [Laos], more than 90% broke out in commercial poultry operations, not free-ranging flocks.”

Monsanto (and others) is currently working with the USDA to force small farmers to tag every animal with a global tracking device (NAIS – National Animal Identification System). Allegedly related to food safety, Monsanto and others would be creating a vast corporate digital library on every move of small farmers’s livestock.

But small farmers do not create the contaminated environments, do not supply the feed, do not grind up diseased animals into feed (how Mad Cow began) and then sell it. In fact, their farming methods, free range and small scale, are significantly healthier and safer for animals and food than the massive concentration of animals by corporate industrial agriculture.

Monsanto is also aggressively pushing for state laws to limit farmers’ right to choose what to plant and the public’s right exclude GE plants from their communities.

Cattle bloated by steroids, lapse and loss of 10,000 year old normal seeds, immense pollution from factory farms, deadly-disease-ridden feed, world-wide bee colony collapse, poisoned soil and depleted water supplies, Superweeds, lawsuits against farmers, loss of family farms, and … India farmers killing themselves in what may be the largest mass suicide in recorded human history (on average … one farmers’ suicide every 30 minutes since 2002 – The Hindu 1.30.08) – that is industrial agriculture.

Monsanto and Tyson are two of the largest industrial agricultural corporations in the world. Industrial agriculture is represented by your Rose Law Firm.

Your claim to care about food safety is terrifying double-speak given what Bill did and who you take donations from. Your idea of a Department of Food Safety would centralize control of food – in whose corporate connected hands? You talk tough about labeling food – ah, but “foreign” food – a sleight of hand tricking a public desperate for safe US food. You talk about food safety but Bill degraded food in every imaginable way and prevented minimally sane labeling.

I am a person before I am a woman. Your gender means nothing. It is a media distraction. Your policies on health and food and women and children, are meaningless in the face of connections that have threatened those groups profoundly, connections you have never denounced.

Monsanto uses child labor in India, primarily very young girls, exposing them to a lethal pesticide 13-14 hours a day, for pennies in pay. But you take donations from their lobbyists. You say you care about black people but as the poorest people in this country, they are least able to buy organic and are forced to eat the contaminated foods Bill let into our food system. The National Black Farmers Association has a boycott out on all Monsanto products.

Do you eat organic?

So, who are you with, hapless black consumers and black farmers, or Monsanto? Mothers left to give their children rBGH milk, or Monsanto? Women exposed to 7 times greater risk of breast cancer, or Monsanto? Desperate farmers in India and young children forced into child labor in cottonseed factories there, or Monsanto? Animals suffering from lives in filthy cages and disgusting feedlots, shot up with steroids and hormones and antibiotics, or Monsanto? Our children who eat candy with high fructose Bt corn syrup associated with kidney and liver toxicity, or Monsanto? Edwards was right about your corporate connections. I just didn’t understand until I saw that PBS show and read about Monsanto, how personally affected my children and grandchildren, and all people around the world, have been.

I will not vote for you. I will vote for someone who will commit themselves to work on behalf of small farmers and real food and decent treatment of animals and to end this industrialized agricultural nightmare that is taking us off a cliff.

Linn Cohen-Cole
Atlanta

Disclaimer. I am not a scientist. I have read for months on this subject, and am including only a tiny portion of the horrifying things I have learned. I am expressing my opinion as a person and may be wrong. Perhaps things are swell out there and rBGH is fabulous and TSE-laced feed is great, and genetic engineering is the best thing since manna. But I am scared for my family and I have not only a right to say so but an obligation to do so. I am angry that Monsanto was allowed the influence it had and has done the things it definitely seems to have. I am disgusted by industrialization of every tender and beautiful part of our world and hope, for all our children’s sake, we are not too late to pull back.

see

William Clinton & Monsanto – a Team for Mutual Profit

Monsanto’s Harvest of Fear

Bill Moyers Journal: Hunger in America + Exposé Farm Subsidies + Soup Kitchen

Suicide by Soda: The Dangers of Aspartame By William Mac (+ videos)

The World According to Monsanto – A documentary that Americans won’t ever see (full video)

GMO

Monsanto

Kissing Worms In Springtime

Dandelion Salad

Reposted with permission by radioroxanne.

by radioroxanne
Saturday, 12 April, 2008

~For Hannah~

Spring is back—Happens once a year for a few months. It means my nieces and I can start going out for walks again. Most every Friday I go to my mom’s for dinner. Truthfully, I go mostly to see my nieces and because usually, by Friday night, my day job, which is manual labor, has kicked my butt by Friday, there are only two reasons I tolerate my family that night. One is because they forgive that I’m so tired that all I’m capable of is being propped up and having food shoveled into me… But the second reason contradicts that, and that reason is that my nieces make sure I’m capable of more, like walking and dancing and playing at the playground and answering very good questions. While I was spring-cleaning my scraps of notes recently, I re-found this story from last year…

**

~A Year Ago This Spring~

We were walking back to my mom’s from the playground—me, Hannah (five at the time), and Allison (eleven at the time)… I saw a dead, dried worm on the sidewalk. They were close behind, so I figured it was a teachable moment, since it was just a week or so prior that we had a close encounter with live worms… I said, “Hey—Look at that, you guys” They asked me what it was and I told them it was a worm-fry—A worm that got fried by the sun.

Death, for the five yr old, was (…is still, I think…) a fascinating injustice. She was instantaneously saddened and just as immediately, called for a funeral. And just as quickly, had the curled up carcass in the palm of her hand. We were instructed by Hannah-the-Master-of-Ceremonies to close our eyes to pray. “Goodbye, Wormy. I wish you couldn’t die… I’ll miss you. Goodbye—You can go to heaven now…” Then she told me and her sister that we could say something, too. Allison said, “Goodbye worm.” I thanked the worm for doing its worm things. Then I peeked at the scene—Hannah cupping the worm in one bare hand, the other hand cupping the worm-holding hand; Allison peeking at me peeking. And then, after one final goodbye, Hannah, peeking at the location of the coil in the palm of her hand…
Kissed.
The.
Worm.

**

~The Things I Thought on the Way to the Thing I Said~

Several things happened in rapid succession, but it will take a few paragraphs to tell it…

First I caught my breath. Then, feeling my heart skip a beat, I crouched down to face her directly, “Hannah!” There we stood, me at forty-three at the time, practically on my knees, facing down a five year old on her own two feet, my face flushed with confusion and concern, her face frozen in bewildered concern for me, as she said, “What?!”

I’ve done a few things in my life—gut wrenching encounters with the fecal, dizzying dances of danger with the profane… I’ve played with dog poop and even used it as ammunition; made – and tried to eat—mud pies; kissed a few frogs (I’m not being metaphorical—frogs were some of my favorite playmates when I was twelve yrs and younger)… But—I – Have – Never – Kissed – a – Worm—Dead – or— Alive…

In this moment, I was thinking a million things, none of which I wanted to say because I didn’t want to spoil the ceremony. One thought was that I could hear the voice of her mother (my sister) churning through the soils of time back to my mom, scolding “Don’t kiss worms!”—But I only wanted to know “Why not???” If I said this to Hannah, I knew she would want to know, why not, and would probably ask. She knew me enough to know I’d want to answer her. I had no answer, so I desperately tried to think of what to say…

All I could think of as an answer to why not kiss a worm, was “shit”. And “shit”, even the word “crap”, is not a word these girls are comfortable with. But shit was the only true thing I could think of: Shit eaten, shit shitted, shit giveth and taketh—This is the habitat of the worm, and kissing a worm is grassroots shit-kissing…

I mentioned here I didn’t want to spoil the ceremony. That’s the other thought I was having: I was profoundly moved by my five year old niece’s reverence for the worm. I felt pride in the presence of her unbridled exuberance, seamlessly expressed from playground to ceremonial pavement… All I wanted to say to her humble gesture of farewell to the worm was: fully, unequivocally, adoringly, YES!

I thought about the meaning of a worm’s life –
http://www.springerlink.com/content/lu75qx4177271563/
- most of which I could not possibly articulate in a funereal context and certainly not to a five and eleven yr old; thought about what I’d heard on this hour of this show by David Suzuki
http://www.radio4all.net/proginfo.php?id=10480
, (in episode ONE, which talks about the ecology of worms and other soil dwelling creatures); thought about the frightening loss of soil on the earth everywhere
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/01/22/6548/
, the lowly worm’s heavenly and lovely home; thought about how important it is that this five year old loved the worm enough to kiss it goodbye…

And then I blew it.

Because it’s only for so long that a sentence broken by one’s breath-caught-in-the-throat can be suspended in mid-air like it was for that six paragraph reflection on what to say to a five year old who kissed a worm. In less than six seconds, the five year old, having said, “What?!” in the face of my astonishment, again implored, “What?!”

**

~Blowing It~

“It’s not a good idea to kiss worms, honey…”

“Why not?” she echoed my own thoughts, as I predicted.

I blinked, glancing at the glint in the eye of the eleven year old, whose smirk belied her pleasure in seeing her forty-three year old aunt squirm, as if in the palm of her hands, “Because of germs Hannah”, she flatly stated, never taking her eyes off of me…

When the five year old asked what kind of germs. I told her I didn’t know, but that it’s just better to know what is and isn’t being put so close to our mouths.

This was a teachable moment with a reckoning.

**

Trying to recover the sacred frame I had shattered with my oh-so-overly-civilized ways, I thanked Hannah for praying for the worm, and told her to put it back on the grass when she was done, thinking all the time about the oxymoronic dynamic to putting a once shit-making and therefore life-giving, now-dead and returning-to-the-earth (and therefore life-giving-again), but earth-covered in toxic-worm-killing grass.

**

~Spring Rains A Week Earlier~

It was later that night, on my own way home, that I came up with the words I should have said to a five year old in the thick of worm-kisses. I remembered another worm encounter from just a week or so before the worm kiss…

The three of us had walked following a spring rain. I paused to pick up a worm and place it on the grass, and when I did, heard, “Eeew! Why’d you touch that worm?” I told them I was just trying to help it get to the other side of the sidewalk… And I told them there’s nothing to “Eeew” about—That worms are cool. I found another worm and to my delight, they both got to hold a worm in their bare hands, for the first time. As I watched them respond to the moisture, the warm, the soft, the swirl of the worm-in-their-hands, I remembered my own erotic encounters of the first kind with worms, hoping this would provide a similar imprint on the s banks of their suburban-fractured earth memories…

After some small explanation, we agreed the worms belonged back in the soil, under the grass. Walking home, they wanted to know all about why the worm came onto the sidewalk (because it rained), why I moved it to the grass (because it belongs in the earth under the grass), and then why it would die if it wasn’t returned to the grass, and then why it would bother to climb onto the cement sidewalk if it threatened its own life.

**

~Because~

While this circular conversation rolled on, with the eleven year old getting bored, and the five year old persisting, I thought about the word “because.” Because is not a word a five year old can embrace. Because is an abrasion on the mind of a five year old. No matter how many answers to a question one can give to a five year old, ‘because” is only an intrusion on the essence of existence, just as the cement is a slicing into the existence of the worms. She wanted no because. She wanted a why. And what I thought about was also the worm, crawling along the sidewalk, flesh on sandpaper, mucous membrane abraded by civilization’s carving and christing on the criss-crossing of cement everywhere. I wanted to answer the questions of the earthworm, and I had neither why nor because to give the five year old incessant and incessantly wise question of why an earthworm would leave its only home risking its only life to do it’s wormful work.

**

~A Leaf, Dying~

At this point I recalled a previous point in our walks, a week or so prior: When I found a leaf laced to near transparency. I love it when these leaves show up, on their way to re-absorption into the soil, ( –again with the help of worms–), so I enthusiastically showed it to the girls. They asked me why it had all those holes in it. I told them it was dying. Hannah protested, saying that no, it can’t die. “Death isn’t a problem” means nothing to a five year old. “Death is good”—“Death has to happen for life to thrive”—“Death is normal” – does not hold any water, rain, earth, fire, nor air for a five year old. No, this five year old instead ran ahead of me, talking over my every attempt to explain death and a dying leaf to her, saying, “No! I don’t want it to die! I want it to live! I want all things to live—I love all living things!!”, running ahead of me with every muscle in her body resisting “death as destroyer”, because she loved in the most passionate way she knew, without knowing the wisdom or pain of death. So, I said something else: I said, “Thank you Hannah, for loving all living things and caring so much that you want to protect them…”

**

~Where the Sidewalks Truly End~

And so, that is where my thoughts were, while the five year old continued, by my side, asking about the spring-rain-worms and why they left the soil and entered the treachery of the cement… I was thinking about the leaf-talk, and how there was nothing to do but make it clear to them both that the only thing that mattered was life, and the only reason for the destruction of it was no reason at all. So, I stopped in my tracks, which stopped them in their tracks, and I spun around on my heels, and crouched down: I said, “Listen: How old are you?” They said, respectively, “Eleven” and, “Five”. I said, “Do you know how old I am?” When they said they did not, I told them, “Forty three”. Then I said, “Okay, next to eleven or five, do you know how long forty-three is? I was being intense. They were staring at me. I showed them with my fingers how long eleven and five are. Then I showed them with my arms how long forty-three is, making sure my arms fanned wide open, to demonstrate it was longer even, than me…

Then I said, “See these sidewalks?” They nodded, still staring at me intently. I said, “How old do you think they are?” They shrugged. I said, “About One-hundred and fifty to two-hundred years old. That’s a lot longer than forty three, alright?!” They nodded. Then I said, “How old do you think the worms are?” (I was thinking in terms of life-on-the-planet-age…) They shrugged. I said, “Millions and millions of years old! Next to One-hundred and fifty to two-hundred years old, do you know how long that is? They shook their heads, eyes wide open. I did the small-fingers and arms-flung-open-wide thing again. Then I said, pointing, “These sidewalks do not belong here. They are in the way of the worms. They hurt them! The real question is not why would the worms get onto the sidewalks, but “Why are the sidewalks here if they hurt the worms?!!”

My nieces stared at me, blinked. The eleven year old’s jaw was ajar. The five year old said, “COOL.” I smiled at them, realizing that I got all intense, and that they were cool with that. We walked back to my mom’s, on the sidewalk, the same way we came…

**

~The Meaning of a Worm-Kiss~

The word origin of a kiss simply tells us of the sound of the word being the sound of a kiss. The word originates in the visceral experience of, the sound of, passion acted upon. A kiss is more than just a kiss when it comes from a place in a heart so connected to one’s beloved, in the case of a five year old, her world populated by living things alive and life-enhancing. So, what I should have said to my five year old niece who kissed a worm was the most rational thing to say: “Thank you, Hannah.” Thank you for loving the worm so much that you want it to hear the sound of your love in a kiss. The world will thrive in your embrace. The world needs your love.

.

.