• Categories

  • The Golden Rule

    “That which is hateful to you do not do to another ... the rest (of the Torah) is all commentary, now go study.”

    - Rabbi Hillel
  • Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Remember to click "manage" to set your preferences, such as daily or immediate and the time of delivery.

  • Subscribe Via Email

  • Note on Older Videos

    Videos posted between 2008 and 2011 are not showing up because the coding used to embed the videos no longer work. Lockerz (who bought Vodpod) has shut down. If anyone has the time to look up the coding (youtube url) and put that link in the comment section of the post, I'd appreciate it. Thanks for understanding. More info: Note on Older Videos Posted on Dandelion Salad by Lo
  • Lists of posts and videos

    Dandelion Salad Videos

    Dandelion Salad Posts

    Don’t Enlist, But Don’t Just Take My Word For It by Lo
    Please pass this on to anyone you know who may be considering enlisting as a soldier (mercenary).

  • Amendment I

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
  • Disclaimer:

    The views and/or opinions posted on all the blog posts and in the comment sections are of their respective authors, not necessarily those of Dandelion Salad.

    All content has been used with permission from the copyright owners, who reserve all rights, and that for uses outside of fair use (an excerpt), permission must be obtained from the respective copyright owner.

  • The Internet is Under Attack

  • US Deaths in Afghanistan: Obama vs Bush. Click here to learn more.

What is the Social Cost of Carbon Emissions? + Why Climate Deniers Are Plain Wrong

Young female polar bear, approaching the ship

Image by mfmb_bentley via Flickr

Dandelion Salad

TheRealNews on Sep 30, 2013

James Boyce: Cost-benefit analysis of carbon emissions has shortcomings.

*

Transcript

***

Why Climate Deniers Are Plain Wrong

TheRealNews on Sep 30, 2013

Arctic sea ice, Greenland ice sheet, Arctic methane are all key to climate change.

*

Transcript

see

Saving the Earth from Ourselves + IPCC report: Human-caused warming is ‘unequivocal’

Why Labor Unions Need to Join the Climate Fight by Naomi Klein

Extreme weather, more extreme greenhouse gas emissions beckon urgent activism by Patrick Bond

The Seeds of Hope by Tristan A. Shaw

Shift — Beyond the Numbers of the Climate Crisis + Coalition Of The Willing

Global Heat Emergency by Alex Smith

About these ads

10 Responses

  1. […] What is the Social Cost of Carbon Emissions? + Why Climate Deniers Are Plain Wrong […]

  2. […] What is the Social Cost of Carbon Emissions? + Why Climate Deniers Are Plain Wrong […]

  3. This controversy over climate is a nightmare to disentangle.

    Obviously, there are those who are simply shouting and thumping the table, but there are others who dispute the givens, and have every right to do so, providing they can exercise intellectual equivalence..

    Science takes time and analysis is difficult. Plausible interpretation is even more contentious. The biggest problem is that we are, of necessity, extrapolating from general data to particular conclusions, and the inferences are uncertain. Also the data must and should be challenged by individuals who are competent to do so who do not share any demonstrable interest in the findings.

    Moreover, the huge corporate interests who are investing and exacerbating the confusion are playing a double game. Big business wants to win whatever the outcomes, trading in ignorance is every bit as profitable as plausible hypotheses.

    I would suggest there are two serious issues that ought to be taken into account.

    The first is the high probability, indeed, virtual,certainty, that whatever humans do must affect the world in some way, much of it for the worse.

    The second is the problem of consensus and localisation.

    All of Nature seems to operate on a fine principle of meticulous (indeed, very likely, metaphysical) adjustment; so, no matter what we think, there has to be a consequence for every action, at some level of complexity or other.

    The problem is we really don’t know enough. To infer the knowable from the unknown is simply folly. All probabilities must be calculated from givens. Human knowledge is very limited. It is estimated for example that we have but scarce understanding of even 2/3% of microbial life.

    Vast sums, reputations and wealthy interests are at stake. When government owned and operated “scientific bodies” declare unanimous agreement, the grim reality is that they are also promoting a political stance and an institutional bias.

    The only way to evaluate the quality of any “science” (even “political science”) is to analyse what has been excluded, elided, ignored or obfuscated.

  4. […] What is the Social Cost of Carbon Emissions? + Why Climate Deniers Are Plain Wrong […]

  5. […] What is the Social Cost of Carbon Emissions? + Why Climate Deniers Are Plain Wrong […]

  6. Is anyone bothering to analyze what all this is doing to the animal world???

  7. Was Mars once inhabited by climate deniers too?

  8. […] What is the Social Cost of Carbon Emissions? + Why Climate Deniers Are Plain Wrong […]

Please add to the conversation.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s