• Categories

  • The Golden Rule

    “That which is hateful to you do not do to another ... the rest (of the Torah) is all commentary, now go study.”

    - Rabbi Hillel
  • Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Remember to click "manage" to set your preferences, such as daily or immediate and the time of delivery.

  • Subscribe Via Email

  • Blog Stats

    • 4,089,088 views
  • Note on Older Videos

    Videos posted between 2008 and 2010 are not showing up because the coding used to embed the videos no longer work. Lockerz (who bought Vodpod) has shut down. If anyone has the time to look up the coding (youtube url) and put that link in the comment section of the post, I'd appreciate it. Thanks for understanding. More info: Note on Older Videos Posted on Dandelion Salad by Lo
  • Lists of posts and videos

    Dandelion Salad Videos

    Dandelion Salad Posts

    Don’t Enlist, But Don’t Just Take My Word For It by Lo
    Please pass this on to anyone you know who may be considering enlisting as a soldier (mercenary).

  • Amendment I

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
  • Disclaimer:

    The views and/or opinions posted on all the blog posts and in the comment sections are of their respective authors, not necessarily those of Dandelion Salad.

    All content has been used with permission from the copyright owners, who reserve all rights, and that for uses outside of fair use (an excerpt), permission must be obtained from the respective copyright owner.

  • Proud Member of The Internet Defense League

    The Internet Defense League

  • US Deaths in Afghanistan: Obama vs Bush. Click here to learn more.

Israel Bites the Hand that Feeds… and Washington Keeps on Feeding by Finian Cunningham

by Finian Cunningham
Writer, Dandelion Salad
East Africa
Crossposted from Strategic Culture Foundation
January 20, 2014

The Seperation Wall.

Image by young shanahan via Flickr

A rare public spat between Washington and Israeli in recent days has revealed much about the essential political relationship between the two.

The row began when Israeli minister for military affairs Moshe Ya’alon spoke to local media with vitriolic contempt about America’s top diplomat, John Kerry.

Kerry had only days before been in the Middle East on yet another visit to push the so-called Israeli-Palestinian peace process along. The US secretary of state has flown to Israel on at least five occasions over as many months since he made a big show of kick-starting “final status” negotiations between the Israelis and Palestinians last year.

Recall that Kerry had then set out a timeframe of nine months for a final peace settlement to be achieved under his watch when he announced this roadmap in Washington last July. As it turns out that deadline looks nowhere near being met, as this column appraised at that time.

After his latest visit, the noise of Kerry’s departing aircraft had barely dimmed when Israeli minister Ya’alon began telling reporters of his unvarnished disdain for the American diplomat. “The best thing John Kerry can do is win the Nobel Prize and then leave us alone”, said Ya’alon. He also denounced Kerry as “naive” and for meddling in Israel’s affairs. “There is nothing he [Kerry] can tell me about the conflict with the Palestinians”.

Washington responded to the reported comments with a mixture of surprise and chagrin. The US state department called Ya’alon’s remarks “offensive” and expressed dismay at the ornery attitude in Tel Aviv in light of Washington’s efforts on overseeing the putative peace process. “John Kerry has worked night and day to meet Israel’s security needs”, said Washington in the tone of an indulgent uncle who has just had his feet stamped on by a spoilt child.

There were a few political voices within Israel who rebuffed Ya’alon for his “ungrateful” comments towards Kerry. Nevertheless, Ya’alon’s acerbic derision can be taken as representative of how other senior members of the ruling Likud party tacitly view the American secretary of state, and indeed Washington in general. Their contempt is understandable. Not because Kerry has done anything to impede Israel, but rather because he and Washington are so relentlessly pathetic in pandering to the reactionary Israeli regime. If Washington shows so little backbone, then why not stamp on its toes again, and again?

Put it in this perspective. The nominal Israeli-Palestinian peace process has been going on for nearly 45 years since US president Jimmy Carter signed the Camp David Accord in 1979. Then we saw another “milestone” with the Oslo Accord in 1993 under president Bill Clinton. More than 20 years after Oslo, the Palestinians are no nearer to realizing an independent state with full sovereign rights. The only significant change that can be registered in concrete terms – metaphorically and literally – over the decades is that the Israeli state has continued to expand and consolidate its occupation of Palestinian territory – in flagrant violation of international laws.

During his last visit to the region, while Kerry was exhorting the conclusion of negotiations, the Israeli government was more concerned with announcing new plans to annex large parts of the Jordan Valley in the Palestinian West Bank. How’s that for chutzpah and right in Kerry’s face? This move, we were told with customary cynicism, is vital for Israel’s insatiable need for security. Also in recent weeks, Tel Aviv has revealed expanded construction in Jerusalem, which in effect vitiates the Palestinian claim to the eastern part of the city – al Quds – as the ancient capital of historic Palestine.

These remorseless infractions by the Israeli state constitute brazen crimes under international law. For any state to build on occupied territory obtained through conflict, as Israeli has done from its 1967 Six Day War, is defined as a “war crime” under the Geneva Convention and the United Nations Charter.

Yet in the face of such outrageous criminality by Israel, Washington remains unswervingly servile. Apart from Kerry’s latest pusillanimous pandering, Washington’s servility was on full display elsewhere this past week during the funeral of former Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon. Sharon, known to many around the world as the Butcher of Beirut for his role in the 1982 massacre at Sabra and Shatila when over 3,500 Palestinian refugees were slaughtered by Israeli-backed Lebanese fascist militia, was buried amid fulsome eulogies emanating from Washington.

US vice president Joe Biden, wearing a black Jewish skullcap, delivered an oration at Sharon’s funeral in Tel Aviv in which he heaped praise on this mass murderer, euphemistically referring to him as “the bulldozer”. Biden went on to reiterate the usual Washington mantra about the “unbreakable bonds” that exist between the US and Israel.

From the Palestinian point of view, there is nothing left to be salvaged from the decades-long “peace process”. The chimerical Two State Solution has evidently become a cruel travesty when ever-diminishing Palestinian territory is divided and sub-divided, built upon and walled off with an eight-meter-high concrete barrier, where Israel exerts control over sea, air and freshwater rights, and even basic utilities of electricity and sewage; and where now the ancient Jerusalem capital is finally being expropriated like a coup de grace.

On top of all this, Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu has begun pushing a new political demand that the Palestinians must recognize Israel as an “exclusively Jewish state”. In so doing, Netanyahu and his Likudniks are demanding that more than four million Palestinians forced into exile by the 1948 pogroms and the 1967 war must henceforth forfeit their internationally recognized right to return to their perceived homeland.

Like a parallel universe, all the while John Kerry and the Washington establishment remain resolutely silent over these systematic Israeli war crimes, save for the odd mild reproach to “freeze settlements” – which the Israelis just ignore anyway. Indeed, Kerry and his ilk repeatedly insult common intelligence with their breathless rhetoric about a “peace process” and “final status agreement”.

Even the docile Palestinian leadership under Mahmoud Abbas appears to be realizing that Washington’s charade as an honest broker has expired, and that under the existing American framework there is negligible left to negotiate for. This week the United States Palestinian Community Network called on Abbas to abandon futile talks with Israel. “We reaffirm our call for an immediate end to negotiations and the establishment of a truly representative body for Palestinian people that can protect our rights”, said the network.

So, when Washington this past week deplored the offensive remarks of Ya’alon about John Kerry what it was really decrying was this: the US government has bent over backwards to accommodate and turn a blind eye to Israeli aggression yet the Israeli leadership repays us with insolence.

But this Israeli insolence is not unprecedented. It does not come out of thin air or inherent ethnic character. Israel’s truculence has been inculcated owing to Washington’s unconditional support to Israel regardless of the latter’s criminality. Washington indulges this regime with an official $3 billion subsidy every year – equivalent to the figure that the US government is presently slashing in food stamps to millions of hungry Americans. The real US Israeli expenditure is probably multiple times more when off-the-books military aid is counted in. The US is thus the hand that feeds the Israeli state and keeps this entity viable. Even when Israel’s ruling class bites the hand that feeds out of its overweening inculcated self-importance, Washington keeps on plying with benevolence. This is a relationship whereby the patron rewards the client for incorrigible behavior.

Why is this?

There is a fashion among some critical American analysts to attribute the dysfunctional US-Israeli relationship solely to the dominance of Zionist lobbies and Jewish-controlled mass media. There is no doubt that such Zionist influence has a significant bearing on Washington’s foreign policy in the Middle East and beyond. Political campaign donations – in truth bribes – from the likes of the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) have a major bearing on how members of the US Congress and the White House formulate policy. Currently, the US Senate is working on a bill that some analysts say will commit the US to automatically back Israel if the latter were to embark on a pre-emptive war on Iran. This legislation, as in many other cases, is heavily presaged by the rabidly Zionist AIPAC lobby.

In the latest Kerry phase of the Israeli-Palestinian peace shenanigans, the US interlocutor is Martin Indyk, who is a dual American-Israeli citizen and a long-time senior associate of the AIPAC.

But this “tail wagging the dog” thesis of the American-Israeli relationship fails to account for the fundamental strategic importance of the Israeli regime to US imperialism in the Middle East. Without the Israeli state, the US would not have the military and political platform that underpins its hegemony over the oil-rich region. This is an historical function of US capitalism ever since the Second World War that transcends Washington lobby groups, media pundits or opinion-makers.

As US vice president Joe Biden said a few months back while addressing a Jewish lobby group in Washington: “If the state of Israel did not already exist, then the United States would have to create it”.

Washington may at times show consternation over the petulance of Israeli politicians. American president Barack Obama, for example, is known to find Netanyahu’s boorish manner insufferable.

However, these are mere personal effects in the wider context of geopolitics. Structurally and systematically, Washington views Israel as its military garrison in the Middle East, which it has armed to the teeth illegally with hundreds of nuclear weapons. The Israeli garrison is an essential platform for the US to project its geopolitical power to safeguard its capitalist vital interests. (The feudal Saudi oil kingdom and the other Persian Gulf potentates are the second pillar to the American imperial order in the Middle East.)

The Israelis know only too well the essential nature of the US relationship. They know that Uncle Sam needs them as an imperative for the operation of American economic hegemony in the oil-rich Middle East. That is why the Israelis know that they can at times bite the American hands that feeds – because this American hand will keep on feeding out of its own imperialist necessity.


Finian Cunningham, is a columnist at Press TV and a Writer on Dandelion Salad. He can be reached at cunninghamfinian@gmail.com.

see

Ariel Sharon: His Sabra and Shatila Legacy – An Eye Witness Account by Felicity Arbuthnot

Noam Chomsky on Legacy of Ariel Sharon: Not Speaking Ill of the Dead “Imposes a Vow of Silence”

Israel: Gas, Oil and Trouble in the Levant by Felicity Arbuthnot

Bethlehem Story, Present Reality by Finian Cunningham

US “Feeds” Israeli War Machine Instead of Feeding Its People by Finian Cunningham

About these ads

10 Responses

  1. […] Israel Bites the Hand that Feeds… and Washington Keeps on Feeding by Finian Cunningham […]

  2. Reblogged this on conkrite6.

  3. The bible was written by Jews and claim to be Gods chosen ones yet had no country for many years, maybe they lied and where actually shunned by God and to get favours from all other countries said that those who favour Israel will be favoured by God. That is what any leader would do if he found his people with out a country. They sure were not helped by God for along long time.

  4. If Israel gets Palestine and then others is the US last in 50 to 100 years, kicking out all but Jews to Canada. It makes sense to me for the US to ask Palestine to be a US holding like Japan is. Then they would have power over Israel and have better relations with middle east states..

  5. I would leave god and bible out of this. Even before the state of israel was founded, the Zionists knew darn well what their plans would be: ethnically cleanse the entire area until the last Palestinian was gone. It should not matter one iota who was there first: two people should have the right to create their nations without one constantly undermining the efforts of the other. How would the US feel if tomorrow the Mexican army would march into California, New Mexico, Arizona and Texas – bulldozing everything in it’s path, rightfully claiming the land was theirs and not willing to reach a peaceful compromise? Frankly, I would side with Mexico – the US stole the land. The US and israel: birds of a feather…

  6. There is no obvious solution to this intractable lunatic situation, as the patriarchal God of Abraham allegedly made a promise to Israel, and God must know what He is doing otherwise how could He be God? As a consequence, lots of stuff happened ~ for a long time….according to the books in the bible and its various supporting texts and sundry Hebrew traditions and expert opinions all round.

    Then the Romans arrived…& well, as they say, the rest is history ~ Roman history that is.

    So then this same God decided to give the Qur’an to Mohammed. That changed everything, sort of. Was this a culturally ambivalent act? I mean, did God have a spell of lapsed concentration or something? Or not?

    So is this whole sad story just about real estate; or about religion? If the former, surely the Original Landlord has the final say, ie God. If the latter, then He still has the final say because He invented it all. So what’s He saying? Not a lot evidently, unless everyone else is shouting so much no-one is paying close enough attention.

    Seems to me this entire religious real-estate enterprise is complete BS.
    After all, it breeds fierce myopia, as though there were no other human beings in this world or creatures deserving of God’s attention.

    So I think they should hold a referendum in Palestine-or-is-it-Israel, to find out how many people really believe in God and why, and which God they actually believe in, who He represents (that is to say what His constituency is) and what this God really has to say about it all and to whom.

    Maybe He is just an absentee Landlord, or just finds it too difficult to speak Hebrew and Arabic simultaneously so can’t be bothered to make an effort to sort the mess out. Or maybe He has not only had a schizoid change of allegiance but also a change of sex? In which case, maybe we should just ignore the imbecile men who are all specialists in their own ignorance, and ask the women for a change….

  7. Reblogged this on Strategika 51.

  8. It’ll be hard for Kerry to achieve any sort of working peace agreement when so many people don’t want to see it happen. Good luck….you’ll need it.

Please add to the conversation.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s