by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky
Global Research, July 20, 2007
A presidential Executive Order issued on July 17th, repeals with the stroke of a pen the right to dissent and oppose the Iraq war.
In substance, the Executive Order entitled “Blocking Property of Certain Persons Who Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq” provides the President with the authority to confiscate the assets of “certain persons” who oppose the US led war in Iraq:
“I have issued an Executive Order blocking property of persons determined to have committed, or to pose a significant risk of committing, an act or acts of violence that have the purpose or effect of threatening the peace or stability of Iraq or the Government of Iraq or undermining efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq or to provide humanitarian assistance to the Iraqi people.”
The Executive Order criminalizes the antiwar movement. It is intended to “blocking property” of US citizens and nationals. It targets those “Certain Persons” in America who oppose the Bush Administration’s “peace and stability” program in Iraq, characterized, in plain English, by an illegal occupation and the continued killing of innocent civilians.
The Executive Order also targets those “Certain Persons” who are “undermining efforts to promote economic reconstruction”, or who, again in plain English, are opposed to the confiscation and privatization of Iraq’s oil resources, on behalf of the Anglo-American oil giants.
The order is also intended for anybody who opposes Bush’s program of “political reform in Iraq”, in other words, who questions the legitimacy of an Iraqi “government” installed by the occupation forces.
Moreover, those persons or nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), who provide bona fide humanitarian aid to Iraqi civilians, and who are not approved by the US Military or its lackeys in the US sponsored Iraqi puppet government are also liable to have their financial assets confiscated.
The executive order violates the First, Fourth and Fifth Amendments of the US Constitution. It repeals one of the fundamental tenets of US democracy, which is the right to free expression and dissent. The order has not been the object of discussion in the US Congress. Sofar, it has not been addressed by the US antiwar movement, in terms of a formal statement.
Apart from a bland Associated Press wire report, which presents the executive order as “an authority to use financial sanctions”, there has virtually no media coverage or commentary of a presidential decision which strikes at the heart of the US Constitution..
The criminalization of the State is when the sitting President and Vice President use and abuse their authority through executive orders, presidential directives or otherwise to define “who are the criminals” when in fact they they are the criminals.
This latest executive order criminalizes the peace movement. It must be viewed in relation to various pieces of “anti-terrorist” legislation, the gamut of presidential and national security directives, etc., which are ultimately geared towards repealing constitutional government in the case of an impending “national emergency”.
The war criminals in high office are intent upon repressing all forms of dissent which question the legitimacy of the war in Iraq. The executive order combined with the existing anti terrorist legislation is eventually intended to be used against the anti-war and civil rights movements. It can be used to seize the assets of antiwar groups in America as well as block the property and activities of non-governmental humanitarian organizations providing relief in Iraq, seizing the assets of alternative media involved in a critique of the US-led war, etc.
In May 2007, Bush issued a major presidential National Security Directive (National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive NSPD 51/HSPD 20), which would suspend constitutional government and instate broad dictatorial powers under martial law in the case of a “Catastrophic Emergency” (Second 9/11 terrorist attack.
On July 11, 2007 the CIA published its National Intelligence Estimate which pointed to an imminent Al Qaeda attack on America, a second 9/11 which would according to NSPD 51 immediately be followed by the suspension of constitutional government.
NSPD 51 grants unprecedented powers to the Presidency and the Department of Homeland Security, overriding the foundations of Constitutional government. It allows the sitting president to declare a “national emergency” without Congressional approval The adoption of NSPD 51 would lead to the de facto closing down of the Legislature and the militarization of justice and law enforcement.
The executive order to confiscate the assets of antiwar/peace activists is broadly consistent with NSPD 51. It could be triggered even in the absence of a “Catastrophic emergency” as envisaged under NSPD 51. It goes one step further in “criminalizing” all forms of opposition and dissent. to the US led war and “Homeland Security” agenda.
Message to the Congress of the US Regarding International Emergency Economic Powers Act + Executive Order: Blocking Property of Certain Persons Who Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq by George Bush
The Legal Pervert’s Parade: Executive Privilege Über Alles + Bringing It All Back Home: New Bush Order Could Criminalize Dissent by Chris Floyd
The Dogs of Connaught by Glitzqueen
National Security & Homeland Security Presidential Directive 51 (2007)
Michel Chossudovsky is the author of the international best America’s “War on Terrorism” Second Edition, Global Research, 2005. He is Professor of Economics at the University of Ottawa and Director of the Center for Research on Globalization.
To order Chossudovsky’s book America’s “War on Terrorism”, click here
Global Research Articles by Michel Chossudovsky
© Copyright Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, 2007
The url address of this article is: www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=6377
Pingback: Vigilant Shield 2008: Terrorism, Air Defences, and the Domestic Deployment of the US Military by Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya « Dandelion Salad
Pingback: When Collapse Is No Longer Science Fiction: Choosing Hospice Work Instead Of Hope By Carolyn Baker « Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Will Bush Cancel the 2008 Election? by Harvey Wasserman & Bob Fitrakis « Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Nightmare on Main Street: More on Bush’s Anti-Dissent Order by Chris Floyd « Dandelion Salad
You’re either with “US”, or again’ “US”
“Danger, danger Will Robinson”, your future is over.
Don’t care whom you vote for, just
VOTE BY ABSENTEE BALLOT, NO-MORPH
Pingback: Olbermann: Bush’s executive order July 17, 2007 (video) « Dandelion Salad
Pingback: “We know things are bad. Worse than bad. They’re crazy” By Mike Whitney « Dandelion Salad
Pingback: C-SPAN: Caller cut off about Bush executive order (video) « Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Saving A President by Stephen Lendman « Dandelion Salad
Pauaprincess, that’s one of my biggest fears. That’s why impeachment is so important.
Wow, just wow. I’m just waiting to see if he gives up the Whitehouse when his term is up. My nightmare is that he finds a way to extend his term. War President and all…
Pingback: Under the Radar: Ten Warning Signs for Today by Heather Wokusch (video; article) « Dandelion Salad
I’m with you, Dandelion. I’d like to see Kucinich in the White House.
William, I love that…Commander in Thief.
I will add that to my list of pet names which include Head Moron in Charge, King George the Stupid, dumbya, and many more.
Pingback: The Dogs of Connaught by Glitzqueen « Dandelion Salad
Pingback: The Legal Pervert’s Parade: Executive Privilege Über Alles + Bringing It All Back Home: New Bush Order Could Criminalize Dissent by Chris Floyd « Dandelion Salad
Hi James. I’m a Kucinich supporter. We definitely need some big changes in the White House.
Consider a vote for Ron Paul in 08′.
It kind of makes me worry that because I am so against the war that is not winnable, and who the enemy is , who knows really any way? How does the ordinary solders tell who is the bad guy who is the good guy? I mean I can’t tell the difference? Does the and guys wear special arm bands or does the good guys wear special hats how do they tell who is the enemy exactly? I would gather my assets and all of yours are in danger, but I figure what the H I am an American citizen until it is taken away from me I am going to say what I want to when I want to as long as I have the freedom of speech like the commander and Thief!!!
Hi Honjii, it’s definitely getting out of hand to say the least. Although if you read the executive order it does say any person “…to have committed, or to pose a significant risk of committing, an act or acts of violence,” but as we know many of our citizens are already considered “enemy combatants,” and that includes pacifists like the Quakers!
Bush and his administration seem to have very little if any acquaintance with the constitution.
Since the majority of the people in the U.S. seem to be opposed to the war in Iraq does this mean the government is poised to confiscate all of our assets. Wouldn’t this put us on the fast-track to being a fascist state?
Many of the actions taken by this administration look very much like a power grab and is is cause for much concern.
This is really bad. It’s little wonder that members of the Nixon administration are saying the Bush White House is more corupt than the one they served in.
Pingback: Message to the Congress of the US Regarding International Emergency Economic Powers Act + Executive Order: Blocking Property of Certain Persons Who Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq by George Bush « Dandelion Salad