The terrorists aren’t coming, they’re here . . . in Washington By Bev Conover

It’s time to put impeachment back on the table.
Write to Pelosi or call her: (202) 225-0100 and leave her a message. ~ Lo

Dandelion Salad

By Bev Conover
Online Journal Editor & Publisher
Jul 20, 2007, 01:04

Forget Osama and the bin Laden family friends of the Bushes. The real names of the terrorists are George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and company, plus a complicit Congress that, thus far, refuses to use its constitutional powers to impeach and remove these criminals.

Yet, it’s “al Qaeda,” “al Qaeda,” “al Qaeda,” according to the corporate media parrots who spew it 24/7. “Al Qaeda” is responsible for every act of resistance to outright criminality in this world — from fighting the US occupation in Iraq and Afghanistan to attempting to cause mayhem with vehicular Molotov cocktails in London and Glasgow (erroneously called “car bombs” by the corporate media).

If you think 9/11, cooked up by the Bushies’ friends at the Project for the New American Century, who said a “new Pearl Harbor” was needed, was bad enough, now you have Michael Dual Citizenship (US and Israeli) Chertoff saying he feels in his “gut” that another 9/11 is coming to the US this summer.

And the corporate media ate that one, too, along with the dessert served up by the latest National Intelligence Estimate that “the base” (“al Qaeda”) is reconstituted and stronger than ever. Wow!

Meanwhile, the wannabe presidential candidates in both wings of the Corpocratic Party, with the exception of Dennis Kucinich, Mike Gravel and Ron Paul (all written off by the corporate media as “can’t win” third tier candidates), are flexing their jaw muscles about what they will do to those “al Qaeda terrorists” — from bombing Iran to flattening what is left of Afghanistan — if they become the next occupants of the White House. Also, bear in mind that, with the exception of the aforementioned three, all are salivating over the prospect of exercising the power Bush has granted to himself as the “unitary executive” and “the decider,” which is why they aren’t calling for Cheney and Bush’s impeachment.

What is completely ignored by both the corporate media and the wannabe presidents is that if the Bushies pull off their next 9/11, George W. will have his “catastrophic emergency” in order to invoke his National Security and Homeland Security Directive, thereby making himself and Cheney dictators for life. In that event, will all those who stuffed the campaign coffers of the 2008 hopefuls want a refund?

Continued…

h/t: Global Research

see:

My Wake-up Call: Watch For Another 9/11-WMD Experience By Paul Craig Roberts

Bill Moyers: Tough Talk on Impeachment (video link; Fein; Nichols)

Thom Hartmann interviews Paul Craig Roberts (audio link; executive orders; Police State)

Bush Pens Dictatorship Directive, Few Notice by Kurt Nimmo

Bush To Be Dictator In A Catastrophic Emergency by Lee Rogers (Martial Law; Police State)

National Security & Homeland Security Presidential Directive 51 (2007)

US government fans homeland terrorism fear-plans for martial law, nuclear terror by Larry Chin

Police State

3 thoughts on “The terrorists aren’t coming, they’re here . . . in Washington By Bev Conover

  1. We don’t know how lucky we are, the crew and passenger’s of the ill-fated flight that crashed in Penn., may have saved the Republic. They put their own “safety” (not Knowing target, Capitol maybe?) on the line, to prevent further catastrophe. Had the plane hit the Capitol, would it of been enough to suspend Congress, due to loss of life, and No Chamber’s (Reichstags?), giving the President unprecedented power’s ?
    Peace will Expose the Beast, final solution ?

  2. Namiste,

    We have met the evil enemy empire and they are us!!!!! Hopefully some one with some real back bone will become the next president and will say no to war and the killing of other mothers children and the loss of our own kids lives!!!!
    Peace to you my friend,

    Namiste,
    William

  3. What stands out to me as most ironic in the “War on Terror” is that after 911, we were told that there were sleeper cells in the US who could activate at any time. Yet it has been 6 years since we have had any terror attack in this country. Bush has credited that to the war in Iraq. His logic is that by keeping the terrorists busy, they won’t follow us here.

    Well, I ask, what about all those sleeper cells here in the US. Since the atatcks on 911 were so successful, why doesn’t Al Qaeda use these sleeper cells to create as much terror as they supposedly did on 911.

    Terrorists create terror. They do not fight bother to fight armies. That does not produce terror to the civilian population in the US.

    The press is guilty of perpetuating propaganda and not cross checking the most obvious contradictions put out by the government.

Comments are closed.