Bush’s Executive Order on Lebanon Even Worse than the One on Iraq By Matthew Rothschild

Dandelion Salad

By Matthew Rothschild
August 3, 2007

George W. Bush is churning out executive orders and Presidential directives just as fast as Dick Cheney’s lawyers can fill up yellow legal pads.

The power that he is asserting—no, grabbing—with these executive orders is astonishing and alarming. Such power imperils our liberties and our democratic system of government.

Two weeks ago, Bush issued an extraordinary executive order entitled, “Blocking Property of Certain Persons Who Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq.”

It gives to the Secretary of the Treasury the authority to freeze the property of people who are engaging in violence or who “pose a significant risk” of engaging in violence against the Iraqi government or the economic and reconstruction plan for Iraq.

It also bans donations of “food, clothing, and medicine, intended to be used to relieve human suffering” to anyone whose property has been frozen.

On August 1, Bush issued a similar executive order, this one entitled, “Blocking Property of Persons Undermining the Sovereignty of Lebanon or Its Democratic Processes and Institutions.”

Syrian meddling in Lebanon constitutes an “unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States,” Bush asserted, adding, “I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat.”

This executive order is even more sweeping.

Where the one on Iraq applies to people who engage in violent acts or pose a significant risk of engaging in violent acts, this one doesn’t even bother to limit it to that. Anyone who engages in any act—violent or nonviolent—against the government of Lebanon can now have his or her property frozen.

And it also gives the Treasury Secretary the authority to freeze the assets of “a spouse or dependent child” of any person whose property is frozen.

What’s next? Impounding the family dog?

The executive order on Lebanon also bans food, medicine, and humanitarian aid to anyone whose property is frozen—and that includes the “dependent child” mentioned above.

Representative Dennis Kucinich denounced the new executive order as “reckless and dangerous.” He said it is part of a strategy to “generate more turmoil” in the Middle East.

And amass more power in the Executive Branch.

h/t: ICH

FAIR USE NOTICE: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. This material is distributed without profit.

see:

Executive Order: Blocking Property of Persons Undermining the Sovereignty of Lebanon or Its Democratic Processes and Institutions by George Bush (Aug. 1, 2007

Nightmare on Main Street: More on Bush’s Anti-Dissent Order by Chris Floyd

4 thoughts on “Bush’s Executive Order on Lebanon Even Worse than the One on Iraq By Matthew Rothschild

  1. Pingback: Homeland Security Presidential Directive/HSPD-21 by George Bush (10.18.07) « Dandelion Salad

  2. Pingback: In Bush we trust - or else By John Diaz « Dandelion Salad

  3. did i read right? the author is a rothschild? if he is a son of the banking elite then i say it is he and his family, et al, who should be declared economic terrorists and have their property seized. there’s something that’d make a difference to the owrld’s bottom line. i am no fan of bush, but am very watchful of other families, too. if my name was rothschild i would change it to anything to convince the world i wasn’t against 99% of them.

Comments are closed.