FISA courts dismantled just in time By Marlene Lang

Dandelion Salad

What if you or I could secretly commit crimes against our fellow citizens, bury the evidence of the crime by stamping it “TOP SECRET,” refuse to answer questions when we are accused of committing the crime, and then, before we can be prosecuted for the crime, we can make a law that says the crime we committed is no longer a crime. And then call ourselves heroes.

Welcome to the New America.

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act has required, since 1978, that government agents obtain a warrant before spying on Americans. A special system of courts was set up to hear the reasons such spying was necessary, with judges granting the warrants under rather lenient conditions. The feds were allowed, when granted a warrant, to listen in on international phone calls; a later provision included electronic communications: It was simple accountability, based on the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

One week ago, the FISA court system was effectively set aside by your president and his sneaky administration, in the name of keeping you safe.

Bush’s National Security Administration was accused in 2005 of listening in on the international calls of Americans, without getting warrants first. Two American attorneys for an Islamic charity organization have since sued the administration, armed with a log of their calls — inadvertently released and copied — despite the TOP SECRET stamp on every page. Their case is to be heard in federal court in San Francisco on Aug. 15.

What to do? The Bush administration had asked the court to dismiss the case altogether, then claimed it could not defend itself in such a lawsuit, because to do so, it would have to give up information that would threaten national security. In the New America, there seems to be no constitutional tromping that cannot be justified in the name of national security.

But, just a nose ahead of the first serious legal challenge to the NSA’s spying program, Bush signed a law on Aug. 5 that revamps the NSA program, broadening the spy scope, making it all legal.

The handy new law allows international surveillance by means of fiber optic cable — the medium of most international communication today — and best of all, without a warrant. Who needs the Federal Intelligence Surveillance Act?

It was a tricky move. The FISA law had not yet caught up with technology. But suddenly, it was a matter of great urgency, even though the administration had been stretching the spirit of the law and abusing advances in technology to get around the letter of the law, for years. These acrobatics will no longer be necessary.

The FISA courts have been stripped of any real oversight; the attorney general and the director of national intelligence will now approve international surveillance. There will be no examining of the individuals being spied upon, to decide if the surveillance is reasonable. Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell called it “modernizing” FISA, and graciously submitted to post-surveillance “reviews.”

McConnell assures us the new law’s targets will be foreigners, not Americans.

So, relax. You can trust the Administration of the Freely Reigning Executive never to abuse or stretch the limits of its power. Or, you can stay off the phone with your friends overseas.

Daily Southtown columnist Marlene Lang can be reached at blackbirdlang@yahoo.com

FAIR USE NOTICE: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. This material is distributed without profit.

2 thoughts on “FISA courts dismantled just in time By Marlene Lang

  1. The Bush-Cheney regime has broken more laws than the various high law enforcement officials and feds can possibly keep up with, not to mention totally trashing the U.S. Constitution.
    There is little representation by the people anymore due to mainslime media’s adherence to “Operation Mockingbird’s” , the invisible censoring apparatus set up in nearly every major U.S. News outlet, magazines, newspapers, tv, etc..
    Motorcade limo driver, William Greer, can clearly be seen turning and firing a handgun at the late John F. Kennedy the moment Kennedy’s head explodes. All major news media anchors and elements are sworn to secrecy on it and keep the lie that our criminal C.I.A. Government did it and runs the country at gunpoint. Look at the video evidence of the late Bill Cooper, patriot, and see for yourself.
    When I was in Arizona they shot and killed Cooper in another part of that state on an order later described as an emergency not-to-let -him back inside his home alive-order. I’m now convinced it was retribution for his revealing the government murdered the late J.F.K.. Thanks, joe martin

  2. Namiste,

    Yes the whole thing is not only possible but is also very probable that in fact our government practices mind control on us and the media all the time through various different kinds of propaganda. You see that we never see real action from Iraq like they did during Vietnam. Have you ever wondered why that is? Well obviously if the American people actually seen hat it was like there we would all be up in arms against it and demonstrating against it and so the government has a strong arm lock on the news outlets in this country and we never get the honest truth. If you think that we ever do then you’re mistaken…

    Due to our Majority led Congress who decided right before they left on vacation to sign away our bill of rights and the US Constitution which they swore to uphold we no longer have the rights we used to have. We no longer have the checks and balances to the fear of propaganda of the evil terrorist regime. Yes we can Trust our Congress and we can also trust Roberto Gonzalez with our freedom of speech and the head of the CIA they make good judgments I am sure as a court or judge might make in any civil matter or might that be considered under national security?

    Sorry we no longer have our civil liberties as they were given away recently,

    Vote for Kucinich is the only one who has a plan to end WTO and NAFTA and ending the war!!!

    Namiste and peace,

    William

    ======================================================
    NOTICE: Due to ( U.S.) Presidential Executive Orders, the National
    Security Agency may have read this email without warning, warrant, or
    Notice, is in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
    ======================================================

Comments are closed.