GMO Seeds: ‘MNCs Gaining Total Control Over Farming’ by Anil Netto

Dandelion Salad

by Anil Netto
Global Research, December 12, 2007
IPS News

Food security campaigners are now more concerned than ever that farmers are turning dependent on large multinational corporations (MNCs) for seeds, fertilisers, pesticides and other inputs while also becoming more vulnerable to pressures to produce genetically engineered crops.

Gathered here over the weekend, for the Pesticide Action Network (PAN)’s 25th anniversary, many expressed concern over the predatory nature of corporate agriculture and its attempts to corner the entire chain of food production from seeds to sales of food products.

PAN is a network of over 600 participating non-governmental organisations, institutions and individuals in over 90 countries working to replace the use of hazardous pesticides with ecologically sound and socially just alternatives.

Participants said agrichemical sales have become increasingly concentrated in a handful of large MNCs. Syngenta, Bayer, Monsanto, BASF, Dow and DuPont together control 85 percent of the annual pesticide market valued at 30 billion US dollars.

Three companies — Cargill, Archer Daniels and Bunge — control nearly 90 per cent of global grain trade while DuPont and Monsanto dominate the global seed market. Eleven firms account for about half the world sales of seeds, of which about a quarter are sales of genetically engineered seeds.

Genetically engineered seeds are now focussed on soybeans, maize, cotton and oilseed rape (canola).

Such concentration of market control in a few firms has been driven by large research-based firms fighting for market control and profits, higher research and development expenditure (roughly 10 percent of sales) and more demands for data for registration and re-registration of products.

Campaigners have to contend with more aggressive advertising tactics that promote the impression that pesticides are good and safe to use. Agrichemical lobbyists are trying to convince government officials that the industry is “science-based” and that pesticides are safe to use, said Barbara Dinham, an anti-pesticide campaigner from Britain.

Dinham pointed out that the global federation of agrichemical multinational corporations, CropLife International, is now touting itself as representing the ‘plant science industry’.

”We are committed to the safe and responsible use of the industry’s products in order to provide safe and abundant food as well as other benefits back to the consumer,” CropLife claims on its website. ”Through balancing environmental, economic and societal concerns the plant science industry also contributes significantly to promoting sustainable agriculture.”

CropLife’s annual report for 2007 even makes the breathtaking claim that pesticides are actually good for the environment for a host of reasons, including “lower carbon dioxide emissions associated with the switch to no-till/reduced tillage farming systems, and less frequent pesticide applications made possible by biotech crops fuel savings”. Among other claims, it states that increases in agriculture productivity have also protected biodiversity from the encroachment of agriculture.

There has been a growing recognition among campaigners that a broader view of the agrichemical and agribusiness challenge is necessary to take into consideration the new power structures in farming and more aggressive and assertive marketing techniques.

One of the biggest challenges facing campaigners is the corporate takeover of agriculture through a process of ‘vertical integration’. This involves the taking over of the entire food production cycle from the development of proprietary strains of DNA and the sales of seeds to farmers right down to the distribution and retail sales of food products in supermarkets and hypermarkets.

One activist who is deeply concerned over vertical integration and the concentration of market control in a handful of large multinational corporations is Javier Souza Casadinho of the Centre for Studies on Appropriate Technologies in Argentina.

Casadinho pointed to the ‘transnationalisation of capital’ and control of the market by a few large companies in Argentina as a worrying development. ”The transnational corporations are buying up companies that have the potential to create added value,” he said.

”They are also entering into contracts with food producers (farmers) that will determine what is produced, how it is produced, for whom it is produced and at what price and quality,” he told IPS.

”Vertical integration (by the larger companies) thus determines what kind of technology is used in food production and it may be the same companies that are producing the inputs that farmer need,” he said, adding that it would also facilitate the adoption of genetically engineered seeds and crops.

Such integration is based on the law of efficiency similar to economies of scale, and is aided by globalisation, observes Antonio A Tujan, Jr, international director of the Ibon Foundation Inc, a research and educational institution based in Quezon City, Philippines, specialising in socio-economic issues.

Since the global economy as it currently stands favours the multinational corporations and big corporations, vertical integration enhances anti-people and immoral business practices, he pointed out. ”Integration destroys the free market as it becomes increasingly dominated by the giants, which are able to dictate profits and what is produced,” he said.

This turns the market into a sellers’ market, and consumers and farmers have little or no choice. Farmers are forced to accept whatever they are asked to use such as seeds and pesticides.

A democratic market, in contrast, is a consumers’ market, said Tujan.

Vertical integration also restructures the production process and leads to a mono-culture. Self-sufficient family farms and individual livelihoods are integrated into corporations through production and market arrangements, giving rise to increasing dependency among farmers for inputs from the larger corporations.

”It sounds efficient, but it destroys democracy and is destructive of the genuine free market, which can be found in farmers’ markets, hawker centres, and night markets (where everyone is on a level playing field),” Tujan told IPS.

Attempts at vertical integration can also be found in Malaysia, which has unveiled a Northern Corridor Economic Region, in which local multinational firm Sime Darby is seeking to wrest control of the entire food chain from seed production and sales right down to retail sales through British multinational supermarket chain Tesco. Sime Darby has a 30 percent stake in Tesco’s Malaysian operations.

New strategies are now needed to counter these changing power structures, say activists. ”Adapting sustainable/organic farming systems is necessary to stop the dependence on TNCs for inputs and regain control over the seeds and technology,” said Rafael Mariano, the national chairperson of the Kilusang Magbubukid ng Pilipinas (KMP), a nationwide federation of Philippine organisations of peasants, small farmers and farm workers and subsistence fisherfolk.

Tujan, for his part, suggested that consumers should not just ‘buy national’ or even ‘buy local’, but ‘buy small’. They could buy directly from farmers through farmers’ markets, which are expanding in the Philippines and parts of Europe. ”People should be sensitive about how foods are processed and consumers should make a choice.”

Global Research Articles by Anil Netto contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries:
© Copyright Anil Netto, IPS News, 2007
The url address of this article is:


“Doomsday Seed Vault” in the Arctic by F. William Engdahl (GMO)

16 thoughts on “GMO Seeds: ‘MNCs Gaining Total Control Over Farming’ by Anil Netto

  1. Pingback: Inside The Svalbard Global Seed Vault + “Noah’s Ark” seed vault opens | Dandelion Salad

  2. Pingback: Doomsday Vault by Davis Fleetwood (video) | Dandelion Salad

  3. Pingback: The Dangers of Genetically Modified Food (video) | Dandelion Salad

  4. Pingback: No Strain No Gain – As SchNEWS Gets To The Root Of Problems With Seedy Business « Dandelion Salad

  5. Pingback: Potential Health Hazards of Genetically Engineered Foods by Stephen Lendman « Dandelion Salad

  6. Pingback: Jonathan Drori: Why we’re storing billions of seeds « Dandelion Salad

  7. Pingback: Genetically Modified Food - Panacea or poison (must-see video) « Dandelion Salad

  8. Pingback: Franken-Foods: The Plague Of Our Time « Dandelion Salad

  9. Pingback: Feb 25 Program: Seeds of Destruction, US Military Bases Around the World, Humanitarian Crisis in Gaza « Dandelion Salad

  10. Pingback: Unleashing GMO Seeds: “Food is Power” by Stephen Lendman « Dandelion Salad

  11. Pingback: Agribusiness Giants seek to gain Worldwide Control over our Food Supply by Stephen Lendman « Dandelion Salad

  12. Pingback: “Seeds of Destruction, The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation” by Stephen Lendman « Dandelion Salad

  13. My goal is to start gardening this coming spring. My idea is to have a community garden in my back yard which is a good-sized yard for this neighborhood and it’s flat. I want to plant a few different vegetables and have others do the same and then share among ourselves. One person can only eat so many green peppers, etc at one time. (Although green peppers can be frozen very easily, may not be such a good example, but hopefully you’ll understand what I mean.)

  14. Excellent article on GMO,s and control by corps. People are starving at an increasing rate since this trend started. Control of farmland and farming techniques is moving quickly towards these profit driven corporations directly or to large farm entities which through high debt loads unwittingly willingly or knowingly unwillingly tow the line and defend these people, and public tax starvation causing financial pyramid schemes. These practices destroy the environment as more wetlands are drained and more natural historic habitat is perminantly removed to facilitate the ever increasing size of machinery required to pull this off with the shrinking number of operators willing to partake in such scams. Near tripling of cancer rates is another not so pleasant side effect of modern factory food production. There are some laws in places to prevent such things but no one is going to jail, just getting rich or dieing trying. Knock down miles of mature shelter belts or acres of habitat and smugly say “I’d like to see them make me put that back”, is the most common way of dealing with existing laws and your environmentally wise neighbor. The corps are wisely getting the large farmers to do the dirty work in their own stomping grounds, (clear away the bush, wetlands and real farmers, ones that care about how food is produced for sake of family, community and planet,) before moving in to take them out and control the entire food system and manage it for maximum profit. Brilliant. Slow, intentional and sneaky. It is working well I might add. Every move easy to predict if you are paying attention. Most of these same companies are now breaking their original mission statements about feeding the world and are defaulting to their unstated mission of maximum profits as they move into biofuels. This further starves the earths lower income population. These fuels are highly subsidized, highly profitable, and highly suspect as an environmental achievement unless you are running a zamboni on them to protect the occupants inside the building at the expense of the people outside the building. A fair application perhaps. The bottom line of these food corps around the world is profit no matter who or what gets hurt or how many go hungry or starve to death while you infatically state the opposite. Hard to prove but impossible to disprove. Will it ever change. I highly doubt it. This is so engrained in our society today as acceptable that when we buy a corporations product we don’t ask ourselves who it is hurting in the short term or if it in fact is hurting us in the long term. They on the other hand will ask you if you brought your wallet.

  15. This is a lot more important article than most people realize. Agriculture is still the world’s largest industry. It is another prime example of corporations out of control and thinking only in terms of the bottom line and not in terms of what is good for the world and humanity.

    GMO products may eventually be linked with the unprecedented rise in autism and other diseases.

    Where is the accountability for these corporations?

    It should be noted that most corporations mentioned here are US firms with a couple of European firms.

    It would seem what is needed is a mechanism for reining in US corporations and their total disregard for the world we live in.

Comments are closed.