Defining Israeli Zionist Racism: Part 1 by Kim Petersen and B.J. Sabri

Dandelion Salad

by Kim Petersen and B.J. Sabri
Dissident Voice
December 29th, 2007

We must do everything to ensure they (the Palestinian refugees) never do return.
– David Ben-Gurion, in his diary, 18 July 1948.1

Let us not today fling accusations at the murderers. Who are we that we should argue against their hatred? For eight years now they sit in their refugee camps in Gaza, and before their very eyes, we turn into our homestead the land and the villages in which they and their forefathers have lived.”
– Moshe Dyan (Israeli Defense Minister during the Israeli-Arab war, 1967), 1953.2

“No state has the right to exist as a racist state.”
– Palestinian activist and author, Omar Barghouti.3

Responding to issues raised by the article “Defining Racism,”4 Barbara Kay, a columnist with the Canadian newspaper National Post,5 employed a standard Zionist gimmick devoid of elementary principles, historical validity, or logical thematic constructs. Kay’s defense of the Zionist dispossession of Palestinians coupled with heinous crimes against humanity is patently manipulative since she flagrantly attempts at confounding the fundamental subject that defines Israeli Zionist racism in its factual historical context and sequence of events. Writes Kay:

They [Palestinians] were transferred for two reasons: i) because their own leaders told them to leave so they would not be in the path of war, which the Arab countries initiated in 1948 and fully expected to win, after which the people would return and take back all the land and homes of the Jews; and ii) because you cannot have hostile people in your own state if they will not agree to live as citizens. Transfers of populations go on all the time. If the Arabs had accepted the two-state solution proposed by the UN partition plan of 1947, they would have been living in their own state for 60 years in peace with Israel. Why do you blame Israel for Arab intransigence and stupidity?

You mention the expulsion of the European Jews. i notice you fail to mention the expulsion of the Jews in Arab lands, of which there were 600,000, the exact same number as the Palestinians. Except they were not left to rot by their brethren as the Arab refugees were; they were absorbed by Israel, just as the Arab refugees should have been absorbed by Jordan, since ethnically they are Jordanians. So let me ask you: Was it wrong for the Arabs to expel Jews from their lands? And since I now assume you will say yes, why don’t we agree to call it a draw. The Arabs are now happily free of Jews, and Israel – while happily living with their 1 million Arab citizens – is also happily free of those Palestinians who wish them dead.

We present a general dissection of Israeli Zionist racism with Kay being only the instigative trigger behind this series. Accordingly, Kay is just a minute personification of Zionism that we can use as a model for our dissection. Therefore, to deconstruct Kay’s (and by extension all Zionist analysts’) statements — hence, tearing down her manipulative ideological edifice — we have to address first the eminent question whether racism, pointedly, Israeli Zionist racism, is materially applicable to the Palestinian issue. To this end, we will divide this series in two sections: 1) analysis of Israeli Zionist racism, and 2) the deconstruction of Kay’s statement.

Section 1: Analysis of Israeli Zionist racism

Before demonstrating the material aspects and institutionalized policies of Israeli racism in Palestine (and actions and policies in the Arab world), we must define said racism in its practical and ideological terms. However, to do just that, we still have to define first the term, “racism” itself. As a preliminary approach, we decided to rely on the definition given by the United Nations Organization. This is in spite of the fact that 1) western colonialist-imperialist powers created this organization to defend –- exclusively — their strategic and geo-economic interests, an 2) it was this same organization that illegally sanctioned the partition of Palestine between the indigenous Palestinians and Jewish European invaders, thus leading to the installation of the racist state of Israel.

continued…

see

Defining Israeli Zionist Racism: Part 2 by Kim Petersen & B.J. Sabri

Defining Israeli Zionist Racism: Part 3 by Kim Petersen & B.J. Sabri

Defining Israeli Zionist Racism: Part 4

Defining Israeli Zionist Racism: Part 5

6 thoughts on “Defining Israeli Zionist Racism: Part 1 by Kim Petersen and B.J. Sabri

  1. Pingback: Defining Israeli Zionist Racism: Part 3 by Kim Petersen & B.J. Sabri « Dandelion Salad

  2. Pingback: Defining Israeli Zionist Racism: Part 2 by Kim Petersen & B.J. Sabri « Dandelion Salad

  3. Don’t go too far… open up your dictionary and see for yourself:

    Sem·ite (sěm’īt’)

    1. A member of a group of Semitic-speaking peoples of the Near East and northern Africa, including the Arabs, Arameans, Babylonians, Carthaginians, Ethiopians, Hebrews, and Phoenicians.

    But we’ve been “trained” by Zionists that the term applies only to Jews! Ha!

    ATW

  4. i’ve gotten into more arguments about the term semitic…

    i live in a predominantly jewish neighborhood, one of the few and only in the US outside of NYC, miami, or LA/chicago. friends from high school, etc etc etc, damn some of the arguments went bad quick. but they always ended with “you’re anti semitic”

    i nearly ended more than one friendship by as often as not screaming the sentiments above mixed with my own indignation. it’s very frustrating to have a blonde, blue eyed, freckled, patently
    white jewish person call you anti semitic when you yourself have a semitic last name, semitic features, and are clearly not white in appearance.

    “it does not mean arab it means jewish” is the idiotic rallying cry.

    i’m amazed at how few people especially jewish know and
    understand the term.

  5. Barbara Kay reported the clear facts of history, which were corrupted by a high-priced PR campaign in the 1970s, when the first faux oil-crisis vastly enriched those who hired Hill & Knowlton (fabled also for lying about the tobacco industry and countless other issues — look ’em up).

    And calling this Israeli/Palestinian rift “racist” is patently insane. The term “Semitic” has always applied to both people!

Please add to the conversation.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s