U.S. says will seek 3rd missile-defense site in Europe

Dandelion Salad

By Jim Wolf
Tue Feb 12, 2008 2:32pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The United States hopes to put a third major antimissile component in Europe along with those under negotiation with Poland and the Czech Republic to counter Iran, the general building a multibillion-dollar shield said Tuesday.

The previously unannounced third leg in Europe involves a highly mobile X-band radar station, built by Raytheon Co. It would be placed closer to Iran, which is speeding efforts to build ballistic missiles capable of delivering deadly weapons beyond the Middle East, said Air Force Lt. Gen. Henry Obering, head of the Pentagon’s Missile Defense Agency.

The powerful, “forward based” radar system would go in southeastern Europe, possibly in Turkey, the Caucasus or the Caspian Sea region, Obering told a defense-technology conference sponsored by Aviation Week magazine.

…continued

h/t: ICH

FAIR USE NOTICE: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

One thought on “U.S. says will seek 3rd missile-defense site in Europe

  1. The proposed sites for the latest one are more “Asia Minor”, than “South Eastern Europe”. Vladimir Putin and Hu Jintao see it that way anyway, so it’s another highly provocative move.

    If everything goes to plan, eventually there will be two “components” in eastern europe, one in Asia Minor, one in Alaska and one in Japan. Rhetorical question, what’s between those points? The suggestion that these are aimed at the non threats of Iran and North Korea sounds like something of a decoy, their locations have been carefully designed to surround two very large nuclear powers. In the midst of everything else, the US has decided to restart the “Cold War”.

Comments are closed.