A Conscientious Objection By Chris Hedges

Dandelion Salad

By Chris Hedges
truthdig.com
Mar 23, 2008

Those of us who oppose the war, who believe that all U.S. troops should be withdrawn and the network of permanent bases in Iraq dismantled, have only two options in the coming presidential elections—Ralph Nader and Cynthia McKinney. A vote for any of the Republican and Democratic candidates is a vote to perpetuate the occupation of Iraq and a lengthy and futile war of attrition with the Iraqi insurgency. You can sign on for the suicidal hundred-year war with John McCain or for the nebulous open-ended war-lite with Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama, or back those who reject the war. If you vote Democrat or Republican in the coming election be honest with yourself—you have voted to allow the U.S. government to continue, in some form, the campaign that needlessly kills ever more Americans and Iraqis in a conflict that has become the worst foreign policy disaster in U.S. history and a crime under international law.

“When will the American people actually vote to give to the world more than bombs and missiles, sweatshops, dubious science, frankenfood, poverty and misery?” Cynthia McKinney, the presidential candidate in the Green Party primaries, told me. “Not only do we need an immediate, orderly withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan, we need an end to the militarism that has placed U.S. troops on the soil of over 100 countries. A true peace agenda means a complete redefinition of security. I remain convinced that if people in Haiti, Venezuela, Brazil, Ecuador, Bolivia and Nicaragua can vote a peace and justice agenda into power, then so too can we.”

Examine the proposals on Iraq offered by Clinton and Obama. They talk about withdrawing some troops, but they also talk about leaving behind forces to protect U.S. bases in Iraq, assigning troops to train the Iraqi army and continuing the fight against “terrorism.” Clinton and Obama do not throw out numbers, but a rough estimate would be 40,000 or 50,000 troops permanently stationed in Iraq. Obama, his advisers say, will also not rule out continuing to use private security companies like Blackwater Worldwide in Iraq. The war would not end under a Democratic administration. It would drag on until the mission collapsed and the U.S. retreated in humiliation. And when pressed, the Democratic candidates have admitted as much. Tim Russert in the New Hampshire debate asked the Democratic candidates to guarantee that all U.S. troops in Iraq would be home by 2013. No one, including John Edwards, was prepared to make such a commitment. Dennis Kucinich, the only Democratic candidate who opposed a continuation of the war, had been excluded from the debate. When the question was asked he was standing outside the hall in the snow with supporters to protest his exclusion.

[…]

via truthdig.com

see

Ralph Nader: Why Democrats Lose + What Was Ralph Nader Thinking? (videos)

It’s March 19 and Blogswarm Day! Posts on Iraq War by Lo

An Unreasonable Man (must-see videos; Nader) Parts 1-4

Nader-Ralph

www.votenader.org/

McKinney-Cynthia

http://www.runcynthiarun.org/

3 thoughts on “A Conscientious Objection By Chris Hedges

  1. Well, Paul isn’t running on a third party ticket, he’s still in the Republican Party and the nominee has been chosen (not him). I guess people could write his name in come Nov, but that’s not the same as running on a third party. One can also write in Mickey Mouse (he always gets a few votes in presidential elections as a write in candidate.)

  2. Really?? Hedges mention Nader and McKinney but NOT RON PAUL?? What planet is he on? Its one thing to have Dr. Paul marginalized in the mainstream media, but this is inexcusable in the alternative media. Shame on you, Hedges!!

    ~ M

  3. Pingback: So? … A Note from Michael Moore (+ video) « Dandelion Salad

Comments are closed.