The Martial Law Act of 2006

Dandelion Salad

Updated on this post: Congress Quietly Repeals Martial Law Provision by James Bovard

by James Bovard
Speaking Truth to Power
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
11 April 2008

[According the the New York Times, the world is now in an unprecedented food crisis. A lot of very hungry people are likely to be in the streets in the not too distant future. Between the prices of food and Peak Oil’s impact on food transport, we can anticipate food riots in America just as so many other nations have experienced them throughout history.–CB]

Martial law is perhaps the ultimate stomping of freedom. And yet, on September 30, 2006, Congress passed a provision in a 591-page bill that will make it easy for President Bush to impose martial law in response to a terrorist “incident.” It also empowers him to effectively declare martial law in response to what he or other federal officials label a shortfall of “public order” – whatever that means.

It took only a few paragraphs in a $500 billion, 591-page bill to raze one of the most important limits on federal power. Congress passed the Insurrection Act in 1807 to severely restrict the president’s ability to deploy the military within the United States. The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 tightened those restrictions, imposing a two-year prison sentence on anyone who used the military within the United States without the express permission of Congress. (This act was passed after the depredations of the U.S. military throughout the Southern states during Reconstruction.)

But there is a loophole: Posse Comitatus is waived if the president invokes the Insurrection Act.

…continued

FAIR USE NOTICE: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

10 thoughts on “The Martial Law Act of 2006

  1. Pingback: The Last Roundup By Christopher Ketcham « Dandelion Salad

  2. Pingback: Congress Quietly Repeals Martial Law Provision by James Bovard « Dandelion Salad

  3. Thanks for the heads up on Jim’s articles, I’ll have to check out the FFF site.

    When reposting news articles one should put the source where they found it, followed by the original source. Not everyone does this though.

  4. n/p ; ) just kinda’ funny to me to see it sourced that way. I get FFF’s Freedom Daily e-newsletter and most of Jim’s articles are on there a day before even LRC republishes them.

    take care,
    tim

  5. What’s up Lo. Another story didn’t connect! The ACLU needs to bring suit, and have the Supreme decide is this law is constitutional or not. I don’t think it is, nor do I think any lawyer or judge will (no matter who appointed them) decide it is constitutional. Judges rely on the constitution to give validity to their position. If you take away constitutional rights, they are without a leg to stand on, and every judge and lawer knows that.

Comments are closed.