Journalists, their lying sources, and the anthrax investigation

Dandelion Salad

by Glenn Greenwald
Sunday Aug. 3, 2008

(updated below – Update II – Update III)

The death of government scientist Bruce Ivins has generated far more questions about the anthrax attacks than it has answered. I want to return to the role the establishment media played in obfuscating the anthrax investigation for so long and, at times, aiding in what was clearly the deliberate deceit on the part of Government sources. This is yet another case where the establishment media possesses — yet steadfastly conceals — some of the most critical facts about what the Government has done, and insists on protecting the wrongdoers. Obtaining these answers from these media outlets is as important as obtaining them from the Government. Writing about ABC’s dissemination of the false Iraq/anthrax story, The New Republic‘s Dayo Olopade wrote yesterday: “Pressure on ABC to out their sources should be swift and sustained.”

The Washington Monthly‘s Kevin Drum argued yesterday that despite the need for journalists to use confidential sources, “the profession — and the rest of us — [are] better off if sources know that they run the risk of being unmasked if their mendacity is egregious enough to become newsworthy in its own right.” Drum added: “I’d say that part of [Ross’] re-reporting ought to include a full explanation of exactly who was peddling the bentonite lie in the first place, and why they were doing it.” Nonetheless, Drum said: “In practice, most journalists refuse to identify their sources under any circumstances at all, even when it’s clear that those sources deliberately lied to them.”



Vital unresolved anthrax questions and ABC News by Glenn Greenwald + McCain video

Countdown: Anthrax Attacks Inside Job? + The Long Road + Wal-Mart

FAIR USE NOTICE: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

7 thoughts on “Journalists, their lying sources, and the anthrax investigation

  1. Pingback: Should ABC News reveal its anonymous sources? by Simon Owens « Dandelion Salad

  2. Pingback: Countdown: The Anthrax Case + Hamdan Found Guilty At Tribunal « Dandelion Salad

  3. Pingback: Marching Off Into Tyranny By Paul Craig Roberts « Dandelion Salad

  4. Pingback: Countdown: Dueling Talking Points on Energy + Anthrax « Dandelion Salad

  5. Pingback: Mounting questions over US anthrax probe and scientist’s alleged suicide « Dandelion Salad

Comments are closed.