The Reality Behind Western Propaganda Regarding War In Georgia

Dandelion Salad

By Damian Lataan
08/12/08 “ICH”

For many the war in Georgia may have seemed as though it came from nowhere; as if it just suddenly erupted without any warning. And, if one were to believe what the pro-western mainstream media are telling us, one could be forgiven for believing that it did. The US and their western allies have taken full advantage of this anomaly and turned it to their advantage for propaganda purposes. They have been busy telling the world that the Georgians have been overwhelmed by the Russian ‘bully boys’ to their north when in reality the Russians were and are merely reacting to the murderous bully boy tactics of the Georgian army and their supporting band of US and Israeli mercenary thugs that ruthlessly attacked the civilian population of south Ossetia in an effort to force them to give up their demands for autonomy.

In fact the tensions in and around Georgia, once part of the Soviet Union, have been simmering for years.

The Georgian state is made up of many ethnic groupings many of whom feel more comfortable being part of Russia than having to be subservient to Georgia. Over the years, since the collapse of the Soviet Union and the birth of present day Georgia in 1991, two regions of Georgia in particular, South Ossetia and Abkhazia, have evolved, against the wishes of the central Georgian government, into semi-autonomous regions whose status has been protected and supported by Russia. This has caused massive resentment from the Georgians who insist that these regions come entirely under Georgian control.

Every now and then the undercurrent of animosities between the Georgians and the Russians over these two regions well up to the surface and become a source of potential conflict. In the past Russia, simply by twitching a military muscle, which, if push really came to shove, could flatten Georgia in a flash, usually has seen an end to any further serious posturing by the Georgians.

As well as the existence of these animosities, the old Cold War animosities that existed between the US and her western allies and the Russians still linger on long after what most people believed was an end to the Cold War in 1991. As the War on Terrorism replaced the Cold War as a vehicle for US imperialism in its projection of hegemony into a resources-rich region of our world, so some of those resentments have re-emerged as the new political battles for increasingly diminishing resources intensify. The old East-West polarisations of the post-Second World War are actually beginning to replicate themselves almost as it was in the Cold War days. The all-important difference this time, however, is the new places where the East meets the West – and Georgia is one of those places.

Georgia has recently been making strong moves to become part of NATO and has ambitions to become part of the EU. Russia is not very keen, and, given that the US would like to put their anti-missile shield system into NATO countries to protect them from the so-called threat of Iranian nuclear weapons, understandably so, to limit the number of NATO nations it has on its doorstep. As a result of Georgian aspirations about becoming part of NATO, the Georgians have become close allies of the US and the West and also of Israel who have ties to the small but influential Jewish community in Georgia with some of those members having close links to Israel being in the Georgian government including Georgia’s Integration Minister Temur Yakobashvili.

It was because of their strong relationship with the US that the Georgians considered it safe to have another go at asserting its will over the breakaway regions in the belief that the Russians wouldn’t dare to counter any Georgian moves against South Ossetia with Russian military action and, if they did, the US and the West would immediately come to their aid in the event of a Russian backlash against Georgian moves into South Ossetia. Certainly, Georgia would not have made any such move into South Ossetia without the backing of the US. It now seems, though, that both the US and Georgia have badly misjudged the Russian reaction and the US are unable to move. If they do, it will be the first time that the US and Russia have ever directly confronted each other in face to face open warfare – and we all know where that would eventually lead. As it is, American ‘advisors’ (mercenaries), have in all likelihood been in combat with Russian troops in this conflict as have Israeli ‘instructors’ (mercenaries).

The US and, to a lesser extent, the Israelis have painted themselves into a corner. Neither can afford to upset the Russians too much because they need Russian support over their stance on Iran’s so-called nuclear weapons program. Open hostility toward Russia, a veto-wielding power in the UN Security Council, would mean the end of UN support for any moves toward a UN endorsement of further sanctions against Iran. While Israel could pre-emptively attack Iran and would get support from the US in doing so, without UN supported sanctions in place there could be no reasonable casus belli for such an attack. (With sanctions in place, Israel could always claim that sanctions aren’t working and attack anyway.)But if the UN were to deny sanctions because of a Russian veto this would be tantamount to the Russians saying it does not believe the Iranians need to have sanctions against them because they do not have a weapons program and, since nobody would know better than the Russians about what programs the Iranians do have in place, they are, after all, the main suppliers of the Iranian nuclear equipment, then bang goes any casus belli the Israelis might feel they can use.

The geo-political reality, as we can see, is a far cry from the propaganda and rhetoric the US and their western allies are trying to put out in the mainstream media. And in this day and age of blogs and the internet which is often nowadays keeping one step ahead of the mainstream media, the propaganda and rhetoric is becoming increasingly more transparent in its blatancy.

Damian Lataan is an aeronautical Engineer and Historian.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


Medvedev orders end to military operation + Roadmap for Georgian peace

The Caucasus —Washington Risks nuclear war by miscalculation

RNN: Who’s to blame for the Russian Georgian conflict?

08/08/08: The Beginning of the Summer Olympics and the Third World War

Irresponsible Risk-Takers in Command by Rodrigue Tremblay

Russia-Georgia war could become nuclear!!

Georgian troops fire at refugees + burying their dead

What the HELL is going On?

Georgia’s aggression on South Ossetia is ethnic cleansing + Media briefing of Russia’s General Staff

From Stupid to Moronic to Evil By Paul Craig Roberts

Bush’s War in Georgia; Will it be the Flyswatter or the Blunderbuss? by Mike Whitney

War in the Caucasus: Towards a Broader Russia-US Military Confrontation?

Georgia vs. South Ossetia: a story of genocide + See the ugly face of war

American says US & Georgia to answer for violence

Russia’s Defence ministry spokesman press-conference

A Dirty Adventure – Parts 1 & 2 by Richard Estes

Shelled city is living hell + Did mercenaries help Georgia? + Withdrawal of Georgian troops confirmed


13 thoughts on “The Reality Behind Western Propaganda Regarding War In Georgia

  1. Pingback: Mosaic News – 8/12/08: World News from the Middle East | Dandelion Salad

  2. Pingback: Georgia vs. South Ossetia: a story of genocide + See the ugly face of war | Dandelion Salad

  3. Pingback: RNN: The geopolitics of Georgia (Part 1) « Dandelion Salad

  4. Pingback: Media war against Russia - Reuters caught with ‘fake’ pictures from Georgia « Dandelion Salad

  5. Pingback: Using Georgia to Target Russia by Stephen Lendman « Dandelion Salad

  6. Pingback: Ossetian refugees mourn their dead + Kosovo + misery continues « Dandelion Salad

  7. Pingback: Background on Georgia by Bruce Gagnon « Dandelion Salad

  8. Russian won’t support any sanctions against Iran now. Iran is a line in the sand now. And with a battle fleet headed to the Gulf, expect the Battle for the Persian Gulf to start WW3.

  9. Pingback: Civilians bear the brunt in Gori + Riz Khan: The South Ossetian conflict « Dandelion Salad

  10. Pingback: Bush tells Russia not to illegally invade and occupy sovereign nation « Dandelion Salad

  11. Pingback: Countdown: Beating the War Drum + Dept of Injustice « Dandelion Salad

  12. I’m afraid Laatan that you’ve taken the opportunity to counter the overly biased pro-georgian perception in the media with what ended up being an equally biased pro-russian narrative.

    First, saakashvili is an idiot. We’ll agree there. However, he’s no Milosevic, as the Russian media has attempted to portray him, meaning that the Russians have been for a long time out of line their issueing of russian passports, currency and even putting russian officials in the ossetian governmental posts. Annexation of this sort is not exactly in line with their peacekeeping mission. The reality is that South Ossetia is part of Georgia, and it was the Ossetian and Georgian governments role to work out an agreement, and it was ONLY russia’s role to make sure they didn’t come to blows. By basically annexing South ossetia they only encouraged Georgian resentment.

    Not that it excuses Saakashvili. We don’t have an alliance with Georgia that requires we come to their aid, even if one was in the works; especially when Georgia is the aggressive party. He also massively underestimated American ability to intervene, and had already spent most of Europe’s goodwill with aggressive rhetoric.

    However, he had a number of good reasons to be concerned with Russia. First, bringing Georgia into NATO is a GOOD THING. Or is Russian poisoning of Ukrainian electoral candidates, threats of aggressive intervention in Lithuanian anti-russian demonstrations or the turning on and off of Czech oil pipelines to influence domestic political affairs not enough to convince you that these smaller countries need some help in maintaining autonomy from Russia?

    Russia was hardly a neutral peacekeeper in Georgia, and proved as much when they felt the need to retaliate against Georgia and press deep into their country. Such a drive was hardly a statement of their peacekeeping role but more a statement of how weak NATO will be in the Russian “near abroad.”

    Also, Russia has shown no willingness to do anything but veto sanctions against Iran, and the US has stopped trying to pursue sanctions in the security council, hence why joint meetings where just held between American diplomats, European diplomats and Iran. It’s now a threat from the US (empty as we already sanction them) and from Europe (relatively serious but won’t stop them from refining).

    Finally, as far as i know the Iranians don’t have ICBM technology, making a missile shield against them somewhat irrelevant for the U.S. One in Georgia also wouldn’t do a whole lot for medium range missiles aimed at Iraq or Israel.

    The missile shield is for Russia. Hence why they are pissed, because even after the fall of the Soviet Union, no one likes the idea of the U.S. being able to assualt with their missiles without retaliation.

  13. Pingback: A Path to Peace in the Caucasus By Mikhail Gorbachev « Dandelion Salad

Comments are closed.