Socialism vs. the government bailout of capitalism By Tom Eley

Dandelion Salad

By Tom Eley
15 October 2008

The breakdown of the US financial system and the government bailout of Wall Street have seriously discredited the ideological justifications of capitalism.

Worship of the “free market” has long been something of a secular religion in the US. Capitalist ideology has proclaimed that the market’s “invisible hand” will best advance the interests of historical progress, that taxes on the rich and regulations on big businesses must be reduced because only the “risk-takers” know where resources can best be allocated, that any sort of government intervention to improve the living conditions of workers, the poor, the elderly and jobless youth creates a “climate of dependency,” that government cannot simply “throw money” at problems, etc., etc.

All these shibboleths now stand exposed as rank hypocrisy, as the biggest financial institutions belly up to the public trough. Yet amidst this historic crisis of the capitalist system, some of those opposed to Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson’s Wall Street bailout have claimed that the measures employed are “socialist.”

Suddenly—17 years after the Soviet Union’s collapse and the supposed “death of socialism”—the “S” word is being bandied about by American politicians and media pundits.

Charges that the Wall Street bailout is socialism have come most frequently from the far right wing of the Republican Party. To note a few examples, Congressman Jeb Hensarling, a Texas Republican, claimed that Paulson’s plan may put the US on, “the slippery slope to socialism.” Representative Sam Johnson, also of Texas, warned, “As a relentless supporter of free enterprise, I fear we are rushing headlong into socialism.” Senator Jim Bunning of Kentucky called Paulson’s measures, “financial socialism” and “un-American.” Congressman Thaddeus McCotter of Michigan even compared the bailout to the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917.

The claim that the Wall Street bailout is a socialist measure is absurd on its face. Paulson, the former CEO of Goldman Sachs, who has an estimated personal fortune of $700 million and is a member of the most right-wing administration in US history, has authored a bill that will ultimately divert trillions of dollars to the coffers of the biggest banks in the land. This is socialist?

via Socialism vs. the government bailout of capitalism

FAIR USE NOTICE: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


Does the bailout pass the smell test? By Paul Craig Roberts

Ralph Nader to Paulson: Bail out your buddies + Rally & Protest NYC

Marc Faber: US will go bankrupt

Goldman Sachs socialism

Can Congress Bail Out of the Bailout? by Michael Hudson

The revolutionary implications of the decline of American capitalism Part 1

Anatomy of the American Financial Crisis: How It is Turning into a Worldwide Crisis

The Capitalist Shakedown By William Bowles

Capitalism Hits the Fan

The Economy Sucks and or Collapse

2 thoughts on “Socialism vs. the government bailout of capitalism By Tom Eley

  1. Pingback: How about socialism for the rest of us By William Bowles « Dandelion Salad

  2. Pingback: Mike Whitney: real solution is higher wages + William Engdahl: Europe furious « Dandelion Salad

Comments are closed.