by Kellia Ramares
Speaking Truth to Power
Oct 28, 2008
[In Part Two of her series on an Obama presidency, Kellia Ramares reveals appalling connections between Obama and his foreign policy advisors that spell anything but change in America’s imperial, geopolitical relationships.–CB]
A Truth To Power Exclusive
To read Part One of this series CLICK HERE
Visit Kellia’s “No Pitch” JOURNALISM BLOG
During a debate on January 31, 2008, Sen. Barack Obama said, “I don’t want to just end the war, but I want to end the mind-set that got us into war in the first place.”1 That is an excellent idea. But Obama’s other words, the Democratic Party Platform, and the advisers he has chosen for his foreign policy team indicates that the January statement is just a bunch of pretty words. He will not reverse the trend of American military interventionism that is so costly in lives, money, and American standing in the world. As Michael Rubin, resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, has written, “much of the Democrats’ anti-war rhetoric has more to do with politics and anti-Bush sentiment than it does with ideological opposition to the use of force.”2
Yes, Obama wants to end the Iraq War but, the 2008 Democratic Party platform flatly states:
Expand the Armed Forces
We support plans to increase the size of the Army by 65,000 troops and the Marines by 27,000 troops. Increasing our end strength will help units retrain and re-equip properly between deployments and decrease the strain on military families.3
Recruit and Retain
A nation of 300 million people should not struggle to find additional qualified personnel to serve.
Recruitment and retention problems have been swept under the rug, including by applying inconsistent standards and using the “Stop Loss” program to keep our servicemen and women in the force after their enlistment has expired. We will reach out to youth, as well as to the parents, teachers, coaches, and community and religious leaders who influence them, (emphasis mine) and make it an imperative to restore the ethic of public service, whether it be serving their local communities in such roles as teachers or first responders, or serving in the military and reserve forces (emphasis mine) or diplomatic corps that keep our nation free and safe.4
Re-train and re-equip properly between deployments? Sounds like Obama plans to keep the military busy.
[…]
via Carolyn Baker – OBAMA: CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN–NOT! Part 2 By Kellia Ramares
see
Obama: Change You Can Believe In–Not (Part 1: The Economy)
Whoever Wins U.S. Election, Policy in ‘War on Terror’ Unlikely to Change By Jeremy R. Hammond
Political Equivalence by Ralph Nader
Valuable, Voluntary and Educational National Youth Service by William Cox
Obama: Nearly $1 Trillion to spend on “National Security Force” of children + Reinstating the Draft
Obama calls for US military mobilization (draft)
Countdown: McCain Supports The “DRAFT”
Pingback: Zinn Will Vote for Nader! « Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Obama’s chief of staff choice favors compulsory universal service « Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Obama: Change You Can Believe In–Not, Part 3: Israel and Iran « Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Obama the Stalker by Joel S. Hirschhorn « Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Countdown: Campaign Comment for “Joe the Plumber” + Matthews Responds to the Obamamercial « Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Presidential elections: planning for the worse By Roland Michel Tremblay « Dandelion Salad
I’m so happy to see more and more people becoming aware of the fallacy that is the Obama campaign.
Pingback: Twelve Reasons to Reject Obama and Support Nader/McKinney « Dandelion Salad