The More Things Change The More They Stay The Same by Ralph Nader

Dandelion Salad

by Ralph Nader
The Nader Page
Nov 20, 2008

While the liberal intelligentsia was swooning over Barack Obama during his presidential campaign, I counseled “prepare to be disappointed.” His record as a Illinois state and U.S. Senator, together with the many progressive and long overdue courses of action he opposed during his campaign, rendered such a prediction unfortunate but obvious.

Now this same intelligentsia is beginning to howl over Obama’s transition team and early choices to run his Administration. Having defeated Senator Hillary Clinton in the Democratic Primaries, he now is busily installing Bill Clinton’s old guard. Thirty one out of forty seven people that he has named so far for transition or appointments have ties to the Clinton Administration, according to Politico. One Clintonite is quoted in the Washington Post as saying – “This isn’t lightly flavored with Clintons. This is all Clintons, all the time.”

Obama’s “foreign policy team is now dominated by the Hawkish, old-guard Democrats of the 1990,” writes Jeremy Scahill. Obama’s transition team reviewing intelligence agencies and recommending appointments is headed by John Brennan and Jami Miscik, who worked under George Tenet when the CIA was involved in politicizing intelligence for, among other officials, Secretary of State Colin Powell’s erroneous address before the United Nations calling for war against Iraq.

Mr. Brennan, as a government official, supported warrantless wiretapping and extraordinary rendition to torturing countries. National Public Radio reported that Obama’s reversal when he voted for the revised FISA this year relied on John Brennan’s advise.

For more detail on these two advisers and others recruited by Obama from the dark old days, see Democracy Now, November 17, 2008 (http://www.democracynow.org/2008/11/17/headlines#7) and Jeremy Scahill, AlterNet, Nov. 20, 2008 “This is Change? 20 Hawks, Clintonites and Neocons to Watch for in Obama’s White House.”

The top choice as White House chief of staff is Rahm Emanuel—the ultimate hard-nosed corporate Democrat, military-foreign policy hawk and Clinton White House promoter of corporate globalization, as in NAFTA and the World Trade Organization.

Now, recall Obama’s words during the bucolic “hope and change” campaign months: “The American people…understand the real gamble is having the same old folks doing things over and over and over again and somehow expecting a different result.” Thunderous applause followed these remarks.

“This is more ‘Groundhog Day’ then a fresh start,” asserted Peter Wehner, a former Bush adviser who is now at the Ethics and Public Policy Center.

The signs are amassing that Barack Obama put a political con job over on the American people. He is now daily buying into the entrenched military-industrial complex that President Eisenhower warned Americans about in his farewell address.

With Robert Rubin on his side during his first photo opportunity after the election, he signaled to Wall Street that his vote for the $750 billion bailout of those speculators and crooks was no fluke (Rubin was Clinton’s financial deregulation architect in 1999 as Secretary of the Treasury before he became one of the hugely paid co-directors tanking Citigroup.)

Obama’s apologists say that his picks show he wants to get things done, so he wants people who know their way around Washington. Moreover, they say, the change comes only from the president who sets the priorities and the courses of action, not from his subordinates. This explanation assumes that a president’s appointments are not mirror images of the boss’s expected directions but only functionaries to carry out the Obama changes.

If you are inclined to believe this improbable scenario, perhaps you may wish to review Obama’s record compiled by Matt Gonzalez at Counterpunch (https://dandelionsalad.wordpress.com/2008/10/29/the-trail-of-broken-promises-by-matt-gonzalez/).

see

Hillary Clinton to accept Barack Obama’s offer of secretary of state job

You’re Scaring Me, Obama: Let the Bush Years Die By Heather Wokusch

Centrism, Paris And The Futility Of Barack Obama by Gaither Stewart

The Trail of Broken Promises By Matt Gonzalez

Rahm Emanuel on Obama Administration Agenda Formulation

Bush will NEVER be able to set foot outside the U.S.! Jeremy Scahill & Naomi Klein

Ralph Nader: The November 5th Movement

The Economy Sucks and or Collapse

Obama-Barack

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “The More Things Change The More They Stay The Same by Ralph Nader

  1. Pingback: Noam Chomsky: What Next? The Elections, the Economy, and the World « Dandelion Salad

  2. Pingback: Kevin Zeese: End the Fed! + Cindy Sheehan + Ron Paul + Bury the Beast!

  3. U?, Please look at our ‘No Dirty Gold Campaign’.

    Respectfully suggest that the fine metals mining industry is as replete with horror and abuse as any of this. The more the gold-bugs ramp up demand, the more horrific abuse will ensue.

    After that, check out ‘Las Venas Abiertas’, we are not far from the crimes of the spaniards if you look at what Barrick Gold is doing to the Andes in Chile right now to satisfy a 20% incrfease in demand.

    Metals are elements, materials, not investments nor money, gold is born of supernovae, the true ‘ancient sunlight’, Making it into an antidote to the fed is a bit demeaning, I think. Can’t we go back to a renewable resource, like wampum?

    I agree this is a brilliant post. I’m not even halfway through the link but all I can say is the info is out there, anyone claiming the people are duped by the media obviously is not reading Dandelion Salad.

    I travelled far to log in a manual vote for Nader, but wish Obama the best. It has to be better than the last batch, but be prepared to be disappointed indeed…

    Just wait till they start in again on the Afghanis (as promised), the dems will be more complicit in further atrocity than they have any idea.

  4. Hope so, too, Epppie. I left the Dem Party in 2000 to support and vote for Nader but always stated that the Dem Party really left me (and my views). The Dem Party nowadays is Republican Light, imo. Very little difference betw the two parties. Many true Conservatives also think that the Republican Party has left them. We need new election/campaign reform badly so third party candidates’ voices can be heard by the general public (that means on TV; in the national debates, etc). Unfortunately it will take the Dems and Reps to make these changes, and well, I’m not going to hold my breath.

  5. It’s all been so nauseatingly predictable. I just hope that little by little true progressives will start peeling away from the Democratic Party code of silence that has risen up with astonishing speed and virulence – the one where you are free to criticize Obama, as long as you don’t mind being shunned.

Please add to the conversation.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s