Obama More Deadly for Afghan Civilians than Bush (in Jan 2009)

Dandelion Salad

By Marc W. Herold
ICH
February, 02, 2009 — “RAWA

“Change” Afghans Should Look Upon with Skepticism

Simple arithmetic reveals that the eleven days under the Obama clock were 18-50% more deadly for Afghan civilians than the twenty days under the Bush regime

The New Year’s first Afghan civilian killed by U.S/NATO action was a boy named Marjan (tr. Coral), killed on January 2nd. (1)The boy had allegedly wandered into a prohibited area in the Deh-Sabz district of Kabul. Marjan was walking home with friends when “international forces” gunned him down. The occupation soldiers got out of a white vehicle, shot Coral and sped away. Marjan is only one of 73-88 civilian Afghans or tribal Pashtuns killed by the U.S/NATO occupation forces during January 2009. Three days later, eight Afghan women, two children and two civilian men were killed by Australian forces in the Chora district of Uruzgan Province.

Much official ado has been made in Washington D.C. and in the U.S. corporate press about how the new Administration will be taking far greater care as regards Afghan civilians. Data analyzed below for January 2009 suggests that the deadliness of the Afghan war for civilians under the Obama clock significantly exceeds that registered under the outgoing Bush regime. Boys, women, girls, tribal leaders all have perished at the hands of the foreign occupiers.

During January 2009, twelve U.S/NATO forces’ actions (including one road accident where a MRAP military armored vehicle crushed an Afghan civilian car) resulted in 73-88 dead Afghan civilians (including five Pashtun tribes people in North Waziristan killed in a U.S. drone strike). The following table presents details:

[…]

via Information Clearing House – ICH

FAIR USE NOTICE: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

see

Afghanistan and Pakistan’s “Salvador Option”, by Tom Burghardt

Bill Moyers Journal: Bombing Civilians + The Cost of Ignorance

US air raid fuels Afghan anger

Afghanistan on Dandelion Salad

5 thoughts on “Obama More Deadly for Afghan Civilians than Bush (in Jan 2009)

  1. Pingback: Obama set to launch military “surge” in Afghanistan « Dandelion Salad

  2. Pingback: Gareth Porter: Why you should know Gen. Jack Keane « Dandelion Salad

  3. Pingback: Change (in rhetoric) we can believe in, by William Blum « Dandelion Salad

  4. Pingback: Gareth Porter: US military leaders are pressuring Obama to cancel his Iraq withdrawal promise « Dandelion Salad

  5. As another post points out, due to the wrong type of aircraft, bombing from high altitude, it is impossible to take care. This civilian death is not acceptable “collateral” damage.

Comments are closed.