Exclusive: Derivatives for Dummies by The Other Katherine Harris

by The Other Katherine Harris
Featured Writer
Dandelion Salad
Feb. 18, 2009

Recent attempts by corporate media to explain the nature of our economic meltdown have left me ready to bite the ears off mice. They’ve been superficial, profoundly misleading and, above all, apologias for the likes of

Paulson, Bernanke and Geithner. So, having spent every spare moment over the past three years studying the debacle that many saw brewing, here’s the simplest explanation I’ve come up with:

Imagine being able to insure a car that you don’t own or use. Imagine it’s the car your neighbors will let their teenage son drive, when he gets his license in a few weeks — and you know the kid is a reckless brat.

Now imagine that, by using financial derivatives called swaps, you can purchase as many insurance policies on this car as you can afford to pay premiums on.

When that car is eventually trashed and scrapped, you — and any friends you clued in on the deal – might collect millions, even billions, of dollars. By contrast, your neighbors, who bought real insurance on a real vehicle, get only its Blue Book value (and, one hopes, a chastened child).

This explains the primary problem with swaps. Anybody can bet on anything, so the nominal value of the bets far exceeds the actual worth of any property involved.

Still worse, no tangible or financial asset has to be in the picture. Wagers of any amount can be made, based only on opinions. You can bet on next Wednesday’s weather, if a counterparty wants to take the other side.

Only a fraction of swap action stems from logical situations in which, say, Party A owns a certain debt-based bond and Party B feels good enough about its prospects to accept premiums against possible default. Those are the Credit Default Swaps we hear so much about, which are a small part of the picture.

Similarly, Collateralized Debt Obligations comprise a much larger category than merely those bonds into which home mortgages have been sliced, diced, tranched and peddled to the unwary. Every type of debt is subject to the same treatment, called securitization or financialization. Commercial mortgages, student loans, home equity loans, credit card balances and auto notes spring immediately to mind, but it doesn’t stop there by any means. Among the latest wrinkles are buying up and bundling seniors’ life insurance policies and selling solar equipment with financing and service contracts attached, so that those obligations can be packaged and resold. Carbon credits, if cap-and-trade is approved in the US, instead of a sensible carbon tax, will be another new toy for the boyz.

Beyond swaps and CDOs, there are many other types of derivatives. Some serve no purpose except adding layers of expense to the delivery of commodities. Think of the possibilities as endless and you’ll be right.

This is how speculators in derivatives have created a “shadow economy” so vast it looms over the actual economy like a death-star over a bumblebee.

Much of their vast construct is not merely shadowy but wholly obscured. Among derivative securities, relatively few are traded on any exchange. So there’s no public record of the rest, which are based on private agreements. A host of swaps have arisen from so-called “dark pools of liquidity” — in which those who play may not even clearly identify themselves to one another. Yet more of these monsters from the deep arise daily. There’s still no rule against them, nor a wisp of regulation. At times the contracts are doubly hidden, recorded off the holder’s main books in so-called Structured Investment Vehicles.

All of that makes it impossible to be certain, but the Bank for International Settlements is a pretty good guesser and they last pegged the total face value of derivatives in existence at $1.4 QUADRILLION — more money than there is in all the world (at least until Ben Bernanke turned on the printing press lately). This figure may have since declined, but I wouldn’t bank on it. A lot of derivatives are long-term deals operant for many years.

Returning to our original example,you don’t even have to await the neighbor kid’s big smashup to start making money on your swaps. Say he gets a speeding ticket or has a fender-bender. Those are documented events that raise the price of coverage — for all who want it, not just the boy’s unfortunate parents. Now you can, by presenting him as a known risk, profit by selling some of your contracts to others for much more than you paid.

In this case, you wouldn’t want to sell unless you need funds badly, but imagine that your payoff depends on the failure of a company, a currency or a country. The weaker your target is perceived to be, as reflected by the cost of default insurance on its debt, the closer you move toward your ultimate goal. So you and your friends will do all you can to drive that cost up and make the world fully aware of it, including buying and selling CDS contracts openly. This makes the rising cost apparent and you can count on the rating agencies to take notice swiftly. Their downgrade will become the death-knell.

Therein lies another great problem with Credit Default Swaps. They work exactly like short-selling and rumor-mongering (which CDS owners may well be doing, too) to create self-fulfilling prophecies.

They also create the derivative world’s equivalent of margin calls, which mean trouble for luckless parties on what increasingly seem the wrong side of particular bets. Staying in the game takes cash, more and more of it.

Such circumstances also invite side-bets — on when the shaky whatsit will fall, for instance. Thus, the money monster grows bigger and bigger. Until it finally pops.

Which brings us to the enormous problem of extracting payment from those on the losing side of each bet, who of course didn’t expect to lose. Gamblers never do, until it’s far too late.

So welcome to the Casino at the End of the World. Where you’re now backing every remaining wager and paying off the winners. In bailout bucks.

Why, instead of doling out trillions of taxpayer dollars through the Fed and Treasury Department, didn’t our government simply nullify these crazy bets that never should have been made — thereby averting the present crisis? It can’t be that contracts are really all that sacrosanct. Credit card companies change terms on us all the time.

see

On the edge with Max Keiser: Goldman Sachs Fraud with David Degraw

Exclusive: Why should I pay somebody else’s mortgage? by The Other Katherine Harris

The U.S. Economy: Designed to Fail by Richard C. Cook

How the US Economy Was Lost By Paul Craig Roberts

Trouble at Treasury – Geithner gets the keys to the henhouse By Mike Whitney

The Looming Collapse of the American Empire by Chris Hedges

Finance Capitalism Hits a Wall by Prof. Michael Hudson

It’s the Derivatives, Stupid! Why Fannie, Freddie, AIG had to be Bailed Out by Ellen Brown

82 thoughts on “Exclusive: Derivatives for Dummies by The Other Katherine Harris

  1. Pingback: Courage versus Malignancy by Rand Clifford « Dandelion Salad

  2. Pingback: Meltdown – The men who crashed the world « Dandelion Salad

  3. Pingback: Super Congress = Fascism by The Other Katherine Harris + Kill the Budget Bill « Dandelion Salad

  4. Pingback: Plunder: The Crime of Our Time (must-see) « Dandelion Salad

  5. Pingback: Foreclosuregate by Ellen Brown « Dandelion Salad

  6. The only missing part of this article seems to be recognition of the “gimme boys” of Congress, Wall Street, and K Street that reflects their devil may care attitude of “got mine,” that accompanies this meltdown of America, and all its inhabitants, citizen or not.

    May as well identify the originators for the purpose designed.

  7. Pingback: Will Hollywood Go The Way Of Enron? Derivatives Come To The Movies « Dandelion Salad

  8. … i have read a few articles about derivatives and just fail to understand what they are … they just do not materialize in my mind as something i can concretize … this article was meant for dummies but i still did not understand what derivatives are … am i that stupid … do i need help … where can i get it … thanks …

  9. Pingback: Bill Moyers Journal: John Nichols and Terry O’Neill + Gretchen Morgenson + What is Reform? « Dandelion Salad

  10. Pingback: AIG-Gate: The World’s Greatest Insurance Heist by Dr. Ellen Brown « Dandelion Salad

  11. Pingback: The Harris Pole – Winter 2009-2010 by The Other Katherine Harris « Dandelion Salad

  12. Pingback: Bill Moyers Journal: David Corn and Kevin Drum + Greed « Dandelion Salad

  13. Pingback: Richard Wolff: Capitalism Hits the Fan (must-see) « Dandelion Salad

  14. Death contracts reach a new low in the Charitable Remainder Trusts where children and grandchildren are traded for low or no taxes. It is an outragenous industry willing to put innocents at risk to make a dollar.

    As if viaticals were not bad enough, now charities have entered the industry as if they have greater scruples than WallMart.

    If Last to Die survivors would not have taxes anyway because of already having Credit Shelter Trust, does the impairment of that contract with a Charitable Remainder Trust qualify as an attempt to create tradeable value where there should not be any – by using deceptive tactics to convert a settlor to a CRUT?

    Isn’t that the equivalent of creation death contracts where money is available after death? It is worse than Russian Roulette. It trades innocent lives for low taxes and money, then relies upon grace alone to prevent what has become an attractive death to the recipents because they then get their money.

    Unconstitutional and dangerous endangerment contracts cannot cure the tax problem in the form of viaticals and charity remainders.

  15. Pingback: How Wall Street and Its Backers on Capitol Hill Silenced a Critic Calling for Greater Regulation of Derivatives « Dandelion Salad

  16. Pingback: Memo to Michael Moore and Matt Taibbi: Capitalism Rules, Like it or Not by Robert S. Becker « Dandelion Salad

  17. Pingback: Frontline: The Warning « Dandelion Salad

  18. Pingback: The Economic Recovery is an Illusion by Andrew Gavin Marshall « Dandelion Salad

  19. Pingback: Socialism and Obama By Timothy V. Gatto « Dandelion Salad

  20. Pingback: What the Big Banks Have Won by Mike Whitney « Dandelion Salad

  21. Pingback: Leo Panitch: Thoroughly modern Marx Pt. 2 « Dandelion Salad

  22. Pingback: Credit Default Swaps; The Poison in the Financial System by Mike Whitney « Dandelion Salad

  23. Pingback: The Gig Is Up: Money, the Federal Reserve and You. « Dandelion Salad

  24. There’s the Time list of the 25 people to blame for the collapse, those who architected this scam and how they were instrumental in these CDSs and the subprime timebomb.

    http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1877351_1877350,00.html

    Got up to Marion & Herb Sandler, who promoted these ‘Option ARM’ loans for 20 years, getting away with $2.3 Billion when they sold their scheme to Wachovia in ’06, which then imploded because of their evil products insured by evil swaps. ( If only one could believe their listing in the top 25 most evil actually bothered them…)

    Headline in the UK Daily Record claiming 10 million children could die as a result of the global tentacles of this recession…

    (http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/2009/03/27/exclusive-recession-could-lead-to-death-of-10million-children-86908-21230851/)

    Certainly Marion & Herb won’t care about that either.

  25. Pingback: Geithner’s ‘Dirty Little Secret’: The Entire Global Financial System is at Risk by F. William Engdahl « Dandelion Salad

  26. Isn’t this analogy the same one that applies to the viatical insurance industry, and the ability to cash in upon the certain and inevitable death of the elderly?

    It is the principle of the practice and its root in lack of human dignity that is pertinent, whether bail out or viatical securities.

    Far different from the notorious hedge fund industry, these practices capitalize upon the misfortunes of others, and that is the evil being spread. The same could be said of betting upon whether Jews or blacks would be persecuted at a time when it was considered acceptable to do so.

    It isn’t the betting; it is upon whose misfortune the betting is based. Awaiting the result is just the timing mechanism that helps to fuel the premiums applied to up the ante. There is good business, and there is lousy business, and this is definitely the latter.

  27. Pingback: It’s a bird…It’s a plane…No, it’s Spitzer to the Rescue By Mike Whitney « Dandelion Salad

  28. Pingback: Let’s Stop Wall Street Loan-Sharking by Senator Bernie Sanders + videos « Dandelion Salad

  29. Ms Harris,
    have you written anything on the latest state of play on the financial front?
    If so I’d love to read it.

  30. Pingback: The Dirty F***ing Hippies Were Right « Dandelion Salad

Comments are closed.