Untold Truths About the American Revolution By Howard Zinn

by Howard Zinn
Featured Writer
Dandelion Salad
July 4, 2009
Excerpt from The Progressive July 3, 2009

There are things that happen in the world that are bad, and you want to do something about them. You have a just cause. But our culture is so war prone that we immediately jump from, “This is a good cause” to “This deserves a war.”

You need to be very, very comfortable in making that jump.

The American Revolution—independence from England—was a just cause. Why should the colonists here be occupied by and oppressed by England? But therefore, did we have to go to the Revolutionary War?

How many people died in the Revolutionary War?

Nobody ever knows exactly how many people die in wars, but it’s likely that 25,000 to 50,000 people died in this one. So let’s take the lower figure—25,000 people died out of a population of three million. That would be equivalent today to two and a half million people dying to get England off our backs.

You might consider that worth it, or you might not.

Canada is independent of England, isn’t it? I think so. Not a bad society. Canadians have good health care. They have a lot of things we don’t have. They didn’t fight a bloody revolutionary war. Why do we assume that we had to fight a bloody revolutionary war to get rid of England?

In the year before those famous shots were fired, farmers in Western Massachusetts had driven the British government out without firing a single shot. They had assembled by the thousands and thousands around courthouses and colonial offices and they had just taken over and they said goodbye to the British officials. It was a nonviolent revolution that took place. But then came Lexington and Concord, and the revolution became violent, and it was run not by the farmers but by the Founding Fathers. The farmers were rather poor; the Founding Fathers were rather rich.

Who actually gained from that victory over England? It’s very important to ask about any policy, and especially about war: Who gained what? And it’s very important to notice differences among the various parts of the population. That’s one thing we’re not accustomed to in this country because we don’t think in class terms. We think, “Oh, we all have the same interests.” For instance, we think that we all had the same interests in independence from England. We did not have all the same interests.

Do you think the Indians cared about independence from England? No, in fact, the Indians were unhappy that we won independence from England, because England had set a line—in the Proclamation of 1763—that said you couldn’t go westward into Indian territory. They didn’t do it because they loved the Indians. They didn’t want trouble. When Britain was defeated in the Revolutionary War, that line was eliminated, and now the way was open for the colonists to move westward across the continent, which they did for the next 100 years, committing massacres and making sure that they destroyed Indian civilization.

So when you look at the American Revolution, there’s a fact that you have to take into consideration. Indians—no, they didn’t benefit.

Did blacks benefit from the American Revolution?

Slavery was there before. Slavery was there after. Not only that, we wrote slavery into the Constitution. We legitimized it.

What about class divisions?

Did ordinary white farmers have the same interest in the revolution as a John Hancock or Morris or Madison or Jefferson or the slaveholders or the bondholders? Not really.

It was not all the common people getting together to fight against England. They had a very hard time assembling an army. They took poor guys and promised them land. They browbeat people and, oh yes, they inspired people with the Declaration of Independence. It’s always good, if you want people to go to war, to give them a good document and have good words: life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Of course, when they wrote the Constitution, they were more concerned with property than life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. You should take notice of these little things.

There were class divisions. When you assess and evaluate a war, when you assess and evaluate any policy, you have to ask: Who gets what?

We were a class society from the beginning. America started off as a society of rich and poor, people with enormous grants of land and people with no land. And there were riots, there were bread riots in Boston, and riots and rebellions all over the colonies, of poor against rich, of tenants breaking into jails to release people who were in prison for nonpayment of debt. There was class conflict. We try to pretend in this country that we’re all one happy family. We’re not.

And so when you look at the American Revolution, you have to look at it in terms of class.

Do you know that there were mutinies in the American Revolutionary Army by the privates against the officers? The officers were getting fine clothes and good food and high pay and the privates had no shoes and bad clothes and they weren’t getting paid. They mutinied. Thousands of them. So many in the Pennsylvania line that George Washington got worried, so he made compromises with them. But later when there was a smaller mutiny in the New Jersey line, not with thousands but with hundreds, Washington said execute the leaders, and they were executed by fellow mutineers on the order of their officers.

The American Revolution was not a simple affair of all of us against all of them. And not everyone thought they would benefit from the Revolution.

We’ve got to rethink this question of war and come to the conclusion that war cannot be accepted, no matter what the reasons given, or the excuse: liberty, democracy; this, that. War is by definition the indiscriminate killing of huge numbers of people for ends that are uncertain. Think about means and ends, and apply it to war. The means are horrible, certainly. The ends, uncertain. That alone should make you hesitate.

Once a historical event has taken place, it becomes very hard to imagine that you could have achieved a result some other way. When something is happening in history it takes on a certain air of inevitability: This is the only way it could have happened. No.

We are smart in so many ways. Surely, we should be able to understand that in between war and passivity, there are a thousand possibilities.

Howard Zinn is the author of “A People’s History of the United States.” The History Channel is running an adaptation called “The People Speak.” This article is an excerpt from Zinn’s cover story, “Just Cause Does Not Equal Just War,” in the July issue of The Progressive.


Howard Zinn’s “Three Holy Wars”

A People’s History of American Empire by Howard Zinn

15 thoughts on “Untold Truths About the American Revolution By Howard Zinn

  1. Pingback: Untold Truths About the American Revolution, by Howard Zinn – Dandelion Salad

  2. Pingback: Zinn: Untold Truths About the American Revolution – Dandelion Salad

  3. Pingback: Untold Truths About the American Revolution by Howard Zinn (2009) – Dandelion Salad

  4. Pingback: Untold Truths About the American Revolution by Howard Zinn (2009) | Dandelion Salad

  5. Pingback: Untold Truths About the American Revolution By Howard Zinn (2009; repost) | Dandelion Salad

  6. Pingback: Untold Truths About the American Revolution By Howard Zinn (repost) | Dandelion Salad

  7. Pingback: A Leftist Guide to the Fourth of July by Billy Wharton (repost) « Dandelion Salad

  8. Pingback: A Leftist Guide to the Fourth of July by Billy Wharton « Dandelion Salad

  9. Pingback: Howard Zinn: Myths of the Good Wars (Three ‘Holy’ Wars) (must-see) (repost) « Dandelion Salad

  10. Pingback: Put away the flags by Howard Zinn (2006) « Dandelion Salad

  11. Pingback: Howard Zinn: Myths of the Good Wars (Three ‘Holy’ Wars) (must-see) « Dandelion Salad

  12. Thanks you so much for this article.

    I have great qualms about even celebrating the “4th of July” anymore.

    I know that, a few Viet vets that live around here, got to “celebrate” the 4th by listening to people in my neighborhod setting off (illegal) M-80s until 3:00 AM!
    \No, these are not people you want to confront when theyre in a drunken stupor–not even with a disabled vet wioth you, sadly enough…

    Nice. Thanks.

  13. This needs to permeate the pretensions of all the ‘patriots’.

    Did we need to fight this stupid war? NO!

    Zinn is correct in pointing out that Canada needed no such war to be ‘independent’ of empiracal England. The whole Stupid anglophilic empire imploded all on it’s own (the one contribution of the fanatical Germans to modern society, put a final stop to that global enterprise of hate).

    Just now I screamed through the woods, acres away, to my probably mafia neighbor (they say the whole East side of rte 32 was supposed to be controlled by the friggin italian syndicates to dump chemicals and bodies, and own acreages for target practice… welcome to upstate NY).

    I screamed, as I’ve screamed at the hunters through acres of woods…stop shooting, stop blasting, YOU and the USA are wrong, YOU are wrong for being an upstate, redneck, italian trash gunmongering maniac.

    And each time, without fail, they stop (for now).

    All is quiet on the eastern NY front, even on amerigoon warmonger pantriot day… (Italian gangers as well).

    Am I wrong for that?

    Talk about sociopaths, the only way to deal with them is by force… if only of mouth.

    It is still quiet in the woods, I think I shocked the monsters a little, and don’t worry, I’ve always had a fascination with crossbows, and fire… (if only for the elemental aspects).

    But if you stop hearing from me, you’ll know why!

    “Goddamn Amerigaah”.

    • (Please note: I’ve revised this comment– I was having an ‘apocalypse now redux’ moment with all the explosions ‘celebrating’ that awful war). Apologies. It should read:

      This needs to permeate the pretensions of all the ‘patriots’.

      Did we need to fight this stupid war? NO!

      Zinn is correct in pointing out that Canada needed no such war to be ‘independent’ of empirical England. The whole arrogant Anglophile empire imploded all on it’s own.

      Thanks to Howard Zinn for reminding us that war is horrible death, and almost always avoidable.

      Thanks Lo.

Comments are closed.