By Noam Chomsky
In These Times
Nov. 5, 2009
The hopes and prospects for peace aren’t well aligned—not even close. The task is to bring them nearer. Presumably that was the intent of the Nobel Peace Prize committee in choosing President Barack Obama.
The prize “seemed a kind of prayer and encouragement by the Nobel committee for future endeavor and more consensual American leadership,” Steven Erlanger and Sheryl Gay Stolberg wrote in The New York Times.
The nature of the Bush-Obama transition bears directly on the likelihood that the prayers and encouragement might lead to progress.
The Nobel committee’s concerns were valid. They singled out Obama’s rhetoric on reducing nuclear weapons.
Noam Chomsky: Human Rights in the 21st Century
Israel: Forging NATO Missile Shield, Rehearsing War With Iran by Rick Rozoff
Chomsky condemns ‘immoral’ Afghan war + Copenhagen talks will surely fail
Pingback: Noam Chomsky: More to fear from US, Israel than Iran « Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Who’s Afraid of Hiroshima? Obama’s nuclear hypocrisy by James Corbett « Dandelion Salad
It’s not a coicidence that the Nobel prizes were founded by the inventor of dynamite!
One needs to watch Obama’s actions, not his slick meaningless words.