The Decade of Distrust: No Accountability, No Confidence, No Change By Robert S. Becker

Bookmark and Share

By Robert S. Becker
Featured Writer
Dandelion Salad
January 12, 2010

Okay, let’s all play “name the decade.” Trivial or profound, labels matter, even if absurdly minimizing infinitely convoluted webs.  When discombobulated, we reach for handles to unpack jaw-dropping, mind-boggling real-life.  Sweeping generalizations have their place, and one idiot savant among us will capture the significance of the incomparable Bush-Cheney Error, may it never rest in peace.

From the Internet comes the “Decade from Hell,” which could have legs but only if we eventually ascend from current “darkness visible,“ in John Milton’s mots justes.  Getting out of hell is proving harder than getting in.  There’s the Decade of Treachery, or Tyranny of the Minority, or Doofuses on Parade.  Let’s see: The Decade That Went From Bad to Really Bad?  The Decade When the Right Stomped on Everyone Else?  So many choices, so little time.

What Bush-Cheney proved, is no matter how scary our most dire doomsayers, every one underestimated the resulting magnitude of mayhem.  Worst still was having to watch powerlessly, like 9/11 horror replays, while our own leaders decimated the American dream for a generation.  Thus, my longish runner-up pick – the Decade of the Reverse White House Learning Curve, The First President Who Left Knowing Less Than When He Began, If Possible.  Right, painfully cute.

Label of the Decade

In fact, I nominate the Decade of Distrust, because we not only now suffer abysmal confidence in a myriad of critical institutions, but worse still we’ve lost ground in conceiving and trusting solutions.  As the irascible David Michael Green puts it,

we have gone a long ways toward no longer even possessing the capability of imagining better alternatives.  Good Americans  . . .  are losing the capacity to imagine genuine alternatives to an American politics which offers the choice between right, far right and hysterical right, all of them differing only in the shading of the patina they spray over their common oligarchical core  . . .  This failure of the imagination demonstrates better than anything else the full measure of our political impoverishment. What can you say to a country so far gone that it not only cannot swerve the car – even as head-on collision with a speeding freight train is only seconds away – but cannot even imagine swerving it?

Who of us has greater confidence since 2000 that our system, voters, or leaders are willing to address serious, courageous solutions that embrace the profoundness of the tasks at hand?  Who has less, not more trust in elections, campaigns, or political parties; in government, whether Homeland Security, the Federal Reserve or Senate, the Presidency, Pentagon, or CIA; or mass media, Wall Street, or big business?  We can’t even now force obvious sex addicts to resign, despite glaring “family value” hypocrites admitting juicy affairs – let alone cover-ups, misused funds, and bribery.  Once upon a time blatant frauds were run out of town on a rail.  Not investigating the Bush White House is bad enough, but leaving power-hungry, moral midgets in power marks a new age.

Trust as Rare as WMDs

Whatever your politics, no one believes anyone else.  Rightwingers estranged from establishment Republicanism morph into Tea Partiers, assaulting government for imaginary sins, past and future – like the mockery of rationality served up with “death panels.”  The left, repulsed by the distressingly successful, extremist Cheney coup, is doubly depressed when this mania overwhelms Democrats, now bragging about toothless legislation that would have infuriated moderates a generation ago.

Considering how essential for democracy and capitalism to work, trust is our most valuable community asset, yet we’re not even halting its plunge.  After all, it’s trust, not love, that makes the modern world go round, getting you that raise, sustaining your marriage, even a new mortgage.  It’s trust, not love, that keeps us in cars, confident those other murderous, metal machines stay on their side.  If we didn’t trust we’d have tomorrow, today would look very different.

As H.L. Mencken observed, “It is mutual trust, even more than mutual interest that holds human associations together.”  Nearly every decision we make, from marriage to fast food, from aspirin to our final remains, even movies and TV shows, depend on trusting something or someone beyond ourselves.  Truly, “To be trusted is a greater compliment than to be loved.”

A Deluge of Distrust

In fact, what kicked off this No Confidence parade preceded the total Bush flimflam about WMDs or Saddam’s collusion with 9/11 fanatics.  It was, alas, our highest court, overstepping bounds and anointing this minority loser, per Justice Stevens’ dissent in Gore v. Bush: “Although we may never know with complete certainty the identity of the winner of this year’s presidential election, the identity of the loser is perfectly clear. It is the nation’s confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian of the rule of law.”

Because character is destiny, no wonder a tsunami came, capped by scheming, failed vengeance towards “evil-doers,” McCarthy-like fear-mongering, now shockingly from inside the White House, and unconscionable lies spanning wars, CIA agents, federal prosecutors, secret prisons, torture and on and on.  Duplicity and corruption poured forth, from the Pentagon, Justice Dept. and federal reports warped by Bush ideologues – plus corporate mendacity, pedophile-shielding Catholic Church, perhaps crowned by an infamous GOP V.P. choice, who still unloads trust-killing shams like Tundra ice storms.

The range of betrayal thus clouds one epiphany, one moment, epic or trivial, or one miserable, unpunished crime as the confidence culprit.  The horror wasn’t only that bad people did unbelievably bad things, but how few evil-doers were apprehended, then or now, given comeuppance.  Ditto top brass who authorized Abu Ghraib and so many pointless, prestige-damaging cruelties.  Irresponsible bankers who decimated national property values not only weren’t reprimanded, but got a two trillion dollar bailout.  Loss of trust is the high price a nation pays when lawlessness and mayhem rule without correction.

No Accountability, No Trust

Since Bill Clinton was politically impeached, not one really big shot, excepting two governors, has suffered the indignity that fits his or her suspected crimes.  Thus the current, widespread distress with Obama, not simply for betraying his campaign but failure to do Job No. 1: restore confidence in the rule of law, our justice system, even the Constitution itself.  Not even to investigate the Bush-Cheney administrations leaves us open to the Curse of Nixon, his most scurrilous legacy, “if a president does it, it’s not illegal.”  Nothing else turns more Founders over in their graves.

Vengeance may be the Lord’s but not disclosure, accountability and justice: how about simply establishing what happened, by whom, and why?  How do we redeem crippled trust without heeding President John Adams, “There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with power to endanger the public liberty”?

For many, Bush and Cheney reigned as tyrants above the law, knowingly shredding rules, regulations, and laws of governance.  But no inquiry means history will never have confirmed testimony, in effect, handing out a verdict of not guilty.  I suspect our literate president, trained as a Constitutional lawyer, knows the word “trust” comes from the word “truth,” and that civic trust depends on some common truth accepted by all.  We will spend more time and money unraveling the failed Christmas bombing than establishing what happened to our country for eight, long years, perhaps longer.


The Implosion of the American Political Consciousness By David Michael Green

Howard Zinn: The Promise of Change: Vision and Reality in Obama’s Presidency (2009)

Glen Ford: Obama and great expectations + Triumph of right-wing nationalism

4 thoughts on “The Decade of Distrust: No Accountability, No Confidence, No Change By Robert S. Becker

  1. Robert Becker,

    You’ve certainly hit the nail on the head. Politics, banking, democracy, judicial systems, international relations–every system, every institution, every relationship resides on the foundation of trust. And when there is no trust, not much gets done. So we’re stagnating here for lack of trust. And how do you rebuild relationships where you can no longer trust the other person? I’ve been trying with my sister. I tried giving her a blanket forgiveness. It worked for her, but not for me, because I was the more injured party, and I needed to delve into what had happened between us to make sure it didn’t happen again. She refused. It’s kind of like Americans refusing to delve into the wrongdoing of Wall Street, of the military, etc. So it’s impossible to build up trust again. And frankly, NOBODY trusts the U.S. any more.

      • Dandelion,
        I think there may be a small difference between a brother and sister, and a nation in trouble!

        I should say “dire straights” this nation is one of the leading countries in the world and now it is half owned by China, the government cannot be trusted, their are still war-mongers at work in government, the banks and wall street own government, health care? and on and on it goes….

        It is anyones guess which country these damn wars will end, for me, Obama should have kept his word and ended these illegal wars while he had a little political insurance left, the time is running out for him to show his metal, the public is fed up with lies and the government that tell them!!

        • I was specifically replying to peacevisionary’s comment about her relationship with her sister. And it’s time for all wars to end. We can each do our part be being peaceful, refusing to fight, etc. “Choose war no more.”

Comments are closed.