By Robert S. Becker
February 9, 2010
I never trusted John McCain because he never struck me as stable or principled – plus his grasp of ideas and facts fluctuated like glare off water. My judgment focused not on his positions per se, nor successful charade to seem less Republican than his rightwing voting record proves. For years, he parlayed his mavericky shtick, though on a pinhead of issues, until caving hard to extremist leverage, fully visible this season.
Never has he wavered from shoot-first, jingoistic belligerence, using one bad neo-con war to launch another, and another. This never-say-die brawler would refight (and lose) Vietnam again. Still, it made sense that he took the GOP nomination, for those goofy rivals made McCain look nearly-normal: the craven panderer Romney or heart-felt fundamentalist Huckabee, the ex-minister more deep-fried, born-again than W. ever was.
McCain was a temp iconoclast only in contrast to slavish rightwingers, yet he could be refreshingly blunt and funny, with SNL displaying tip-top comic timing. He’s still less objectionable than Sycophant Palin, who magnifies every delusional Dick Cheney sound-bite with reactionary Rapture wrappings. Are we to believe Rapturous Cheneyism is the best springboard for national politics?
Considering 2/3’s of voters judge her “unqualified” to be president (not just “backassward” on issues, her term), Palin will cement McCain’s most perfidious legacy – the most reckless V.P. pick, bar none. Of late, Palin’s transformation, from ignorant, backwater governor to ignorant, backwater celebrity hustler, draws Tim Eagan’s dire parallel with the slickest grifters around:
Palin and [John] Edwards are two of an American archetype, opportunists playing to outrage while taking care of themselves. They are both attractive . . . [and] can both hold an audience without saying anything of substance, or even making sense . . . Political grifters, the smart ones, usually get out while the getting’s good. It’s always about timing: the trick is finding the mark, before the mark finds you.
Read Palin’s incoherent Tea Party Speech, or compelling commitments like “I won’t close a door that perhaps could be open for me in the future,” and tell me Shakespeare didn’t capture being “full of sound and fury but signifying nothing.”
McCain, Raging on the Heath
Just last week, McCain spit out not just resentment voters somehow elected the wrong guy. He shifted from once media-friendly jokester to full-fledged obstructionist spewing rancor and hypocrisy. Across the boards flip-flopping demolished any maverick echoes, as he lurched rightward to counter an extremist primary threat. Most telling was his hypocritical explosion against top brass who now oppose “don’t ask, don’t tell.” Obliterating his own countless assurances he’d follow Pentagon changes towards gay rights, McCain shocked Congress by railing against military powers he once exalted.
Equally revealing, notable for lacking passion, was instant impotence when his life-time triumph, McCain-Feingold, was shredded by a Supreme Court on steroids. Mr. Campaign Reform appeared shellshocked: “I don’t think there’s much that can be done, to tell you the truth. It is what it is …The Supreme Court has spoken. I respect their decision.” Really? More patriotic Americans instantly proposed numerous fixes.
How the once mighty Samson, the great warrior bereft of bravery, can’t now even envision one challenge to the worst judicial decision in our lifetime. More deserter than maverick, McCain sells out to rightwing soundbites by abandoning not just the field of battle but his career honor and principle. Is craziness not raging when you should listen and then shriveling up when you should act?
Flawed as pilot and husband
What first disturbed me was how McCain’s character flaws matched his military screw-ups, the dare-devil notorious for multiple crashes. A dreadful student turned volatile flyboy, he first cheated on, then callously dumped his cancer-stricken first wife for a super-rich upgrade (who bankrolled his first Congressional win). War heroes are few and far between, yet hard to miss were nagging deviations of mind and temper, whether from early torture or aging, or both. Unscripted, McCain’s responses have been scattered and flippantly self-indulgent, evinced by a legion of campaign gaffes. His Senate reputation reinforced the belligerent loner, whose explosive temper matched long-held grudges.
Thus, his erratic ’08 race, inept, full of desperation and gimmickry, aside from Palin. His ultimate implosion (fueled by disastrous talk of “suspending” the campaign) came by gravitating to his least compelling pitches, especially immense debate focus on Joe the Plumber. “We are all Joe the Plumber,” McCain crowed weakly, invoking comic Ron White’s one-liner about both candidate and subject, “You can’t fix stupid.”
As McCain devolved into Joe the Plumber, the poised, educated Obama was cleaning his clock, proving few president hopefuls match him as orator or cheerleader. When brains and know-how mattered, McCain went dumb and dumber. Two years later, the gimmicks resound, with zero kinship between the forgotten plumber and senator married to $100 million dollars who owns seven, or is it eight houses he couldn’t keep track of? Now, embittered, fury drives frustration – and the prospect of forced retirement.
Obama, heroic vs. McCainiac?
So, doesn’t unstable McCain make Obama look better? Does Obama’s highly mixed performance, especially on health reform and Afghanistan, brighten because he beat a goofy McCainiac? Would McCain not have been more decimated by huge problems and broken government? In no time President McCain could shrink to Ronald Reagan in his last pitiful years.
Even more enthralled by Pentagon war-making, McCain’s escalations would have made Obama look the peacenik, no mean feat. Remember McCain’s very bad joke, intoning “Bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran,” which many took as likely agenda. So much for comic charm.
All that, plus the terror of the oldest elected president, health already compromised, replaced for five minutes by rogue Sarah’s incoherence, fed by secessionist Todd at her side. That “revolting development” nearly makes me reconsider harsh judgments against Obama.
Palin Cements McCain’s Shame
Next time you want a shivering horror movie experience, inviting sleepless nightmares, repeat as you close your eyes, “President Palin, President Palin, President Palin.” On second thought, pop a sleeping pill beforehand or you’ll be up all night.
Even if McCain hadn’t stayed well beyond his prime, demonstrating the unreal McCainiac was the candidate himself, I still trust historians will vilify him for picking Sarah Palin. That is even more the case if she gets within hailing distance of the White House.
Unlike skittish friends, I see little evidence Sarah the Sycophant 1) aims at national office, with her thin skin and “unqualified” shadow; 2) could campaign for two years without quitting four times; 3) could overcome the onslaught inevitable from terrified GOP leadership; 4) could win sufficient primaries (or big electoral states) outside conservative strongholds; 5) is willing to learn even the basics about national or international affairs; and thus, 6) invites against a top-campaigning incumbent president nothing less than a Goldwater-Ross Perot-style drubbing.
Unless unintended consequences reign, Obama I bet would relish taking on the entire Palin Pageant, composed of losers he’s already beaten.
Sarah Palin Keynote Speech at National Tea Party Convention
The “Tea Party” movement in the US: a right-wing media creation – www.wsws.org
The Colbert Report: Sarah Palin Uses a Hand-O-Prompter + Sarah Palin is Retarded!
Pingback: Banned Robert Erickson Tea Party Super Bowl Ad – Columbus Go Home! « Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Mythic Truths Unify, Mythic Lies Fragment – “A house divided against itself cannot stand.” By Robert S. Becker « Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Tea Partyers Are White Nationalists, Pure and Simple by Glen Ford « Dandelion Salad
robert, thank you for the clarification . as far as the repub ticket in 08 , it was surreal to say the least. but you see i dont do evil of 2 lessers. i vote for most qualified person for president and campighn for him or her . and every 4 years it keeps being ralph nader.
the thing is ..that we have to keep our eye on the ball and keep taking on Obama becuase he is the one in power. what you say is true in this peice , its just what is the point ? i mean , mccian is about ready to retire, and Palin will be trounced by her own party in the primarys in 2012 , and as she runs for president on an indie ticket , they will demonize her . having worked with 3rd partys and indie candidates , i can tell you that she is about to experince more wrath from the right then the liberals could ever give her. she will be smoked out as a spolier . she has no idea what she is up against. no idea.
Mccian /Palin is obviuos evil . Obama and his chigago mob has pulled a con job of trianulation that should be given no quarter. but make no mistake ..the one with the flowery rhetoric is much more evil if you want to talk evil . i know more progressives that have been suckered into to this war criminals agenda. to this day i am amazed.
if this is an apologetic for the warmonger rpesently in the white house , forget it . it wont work . on the 3rd day of his presidency , Obama ordered troops to raid villages in pakistan . and he has been doing it ever since. and you are griping about Palin and her side show , and Mccain , and the fact that he lost.
go after Obama and what Nader said 2 days before the election ”the election of Barak Obama will be THE biggest con job in american history ”.
to not see that now , why should anyone listen to any defence of him , no mattter how subtle in attacking the loser. the big O IS THE COMMANDER IN CHEIF AND HE IS KILLING PEOPLE IN MANY NATIONS CONSTANTLY . dont put the spotlight on the other side of the stage. impeach !
If this was a defense of Obama, it was pretty piss poor. You should read more of my essays, here and at
to see that I have had precious little of a positive nature to say about this president. Especially on Afghanistan, on anti-terrorism, economics, the whole smear.
I still think McCain is nuttier and Palin far worse than any national candidate in our history so in that sense, I’d slightly still go with Obama vs. McCain, but not for love of Obama.
Pingback: To Tea Or Not To Tea by Joel S. Hirschhorn « Dandelion Salad