CrossTalk on 9/11: Whodunit? + Dr. David Ray Griffin on Yukihisa Fujita and 9/11

https://dandelionsalad.wordpress.com/

RussiaToday
March 10, 2010

In this edition of CrossTalk host Peter Lavelle asks his guests why discussion of the events of 9/11 continue to attract so much attention but is all but banned in the media mainstream.

***

Dr. David Ray Griffin on Yukihisa Fujita and 9/11

RTAmerica
March 09, 2010

According to the chief of Japans Democratic Party who says that the 9/11 hijackers are alive and that 9/11 was a complete hoax. Dr. David Ray Griffin is a professor and author who wrote The New Pearl Harbor Revisited and he says that he agrees; the World Trade Center was a hoax.

The 9/11 hijackers are alive

see

The Washington Post on ‘lunatic’ 9/11 ‘conspiracy theorists’ by Jeremy R. Hammond

A Guide to the 9/11 Whistleblowers by James Corbett

Mysterious Deaths of 9/11 Witnesses (MUST SEE)

9/11 truthers attend Treason in America

The Media Response to the Growing Influence of the 9/11 Truth Movement, Part II by Elizabeth Woodworth

1000 Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth signatures press conference pt 1

7 thoughts on “CrossTalk on 9/11: Whodunit? + Dr. David Ray Griffin on Yukihisa Fujita and 9/11

  1. Btw, Ted Muga, in the video for the presentation at the San Deigo Citizens’ Grand Jury, speaks of a friend or a peer member of Pilots for 9/11 Truth. This other man is a highly experienced pilot and he was teaching a class of pilot students using a flight simulator the morning or day of 9/11. During the afternoon of 9/11, he decided to have the class or group or students try to hit the WTC Towers, 1 and 2, the way they were hit, but using the flight simulator. They all failed and then he gave it a try, failing eight times, before he finally succeeded on his ninth attempt.

    Again, he’s a very, very experienced, expert pilot. The alleged hijackers of 9/11 who allegedly could fly planes were FLUNKIES.

  2. The Crosstalk interview with Richard Gage, Ian Henshall and Annie Machon is excellent, and “man” does or did Peter Lavelle seem to be play-acting the devil’s advocate and well, unscientific, citizen role. I am not sure, but believe he acted that way intentionally, to try to make the whole interview one that doubters of 9/11 Truth research and activism an interview that such people would or might tend to more likely listen to than if he hadn’t acted like devil’s advocate and having no scientific understanding at all. Or I hope it’s why he acted that way. Otherwise, he needs to get some education.

    In addition to the several related Dandelion Salad links that were posted as comments or using comments, I wish to recommend http://www.911review.com and http://www.911research.wtc7.net. I just learned through an email exchange with the editor of the first of these two websites that he’s Jim Hoffman and from some of his articles that I’ve read and a couple of videos for presentations that he and Don Paul made at Citizens’ Grand Juries in the U.S., one in L.A., the other in San Diego, several years ago, he’s a real 9/11 Truth activist and analyst; as is also Don Paul.

    I don’t recall the title of the video page for the presentation they gave or made at the San Diego Citizens’ Grand Jury, but it was about the rather very evident NORAD stand-down and, I believe anyway, also the strike on the Pentagon on 9/11. Hijackers? Well, several, at least seven of the alleged hijackers were proven to be alive years later, and the FBI “comically” never removed these misidentified, say, people from the list of 9/11 hijackers. Even the BBC reported on this. But there’s a lot more to the question of whether or not any of the alleged hijackers really hijacked any of the 9/11 attack planes, or planes turned into attack planes, too. NORAD stand-down is rather unquestionably true, but this, by itself, does not necessarily mean that there weren’t also real hijackers. I think it’s near the end of the video clip of the presentation given by Don Paul and Jim Hoffman in San Diego that a senior citizen who is a highly experienced pilot of commercial airliners and possibly also in the military explains that it’s virtually impossible for the planes to have been hijacked. Jim Hoffman, in the earlier part of the video, highlights two technological ways that could’ve been used to make the commerical airliners attack planes. One is remote control, which these planes are equipped with, while the other way is the insertion of a TROJAN program into the planes’ control systems.

    I had read about the remote control feature in these planes, before, but that presentation in San Diego, the video recording of it, was the first time I’ve heard or read of a TROJAN program possibly having been used. Trojan, like with computers; viruses, worms, .., the various types of [mal]ware.

    However, all honest and very experienced pilots state that none of the alleged hijackers could’ve possibly been able to fly the 757 into the Pentagon the way that happened and retired USAF Lt Col Bowman and some others have also said that even a highly experienced, expert pilot would not likely be able to get the strike right even on the second attempt. AA 757, or a similar plane, that hit the Pentagon did not hit on the first attempt or fly-in. It had to go back up quite high and perform quite a turn and downward flight before hitting on the second attempt; something that would be extremely difficult for even expert pilots.

    There is some of that very kind of explanation in the aforementioned video, as well.

    NOW, I wish to recommend the presentation that Jim Hoffman and Don Paul made in L.A. and which I just a few hours ago.

    “Excerpts from 1-A/B ‘9/11 Guilt: The Proof Is in Your Hands'”, Part 1 of 3 (9:55), Goldenstar6066, Aug 24 2006 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iAJJASlY3A

    The text with that video speaks of Celestine Star, but she doesn’t appear in any of the three parts. Perhaps she is the owner of the production company, Golden Star Productions, I believe.

    Jim Hoffman addresses the topic of the destruction, that is, controlled demolition, of the WTC Towers, 1 and 2 anyway. Don Paul speaks on the very important topic of the war on Afghanistan highly (to say the least) being for the huge, astronomical profits the BANKSTERS make from the heroin trade. He does that in Part 1-B of the first clip. In the third clip, he provides a very or extremely important comparitive analysis for the destruction of WTC 7 on 9/11 based on the controlled demolition of the 35-story J.L. Hudson Building in Detroit by CDI, Controlled Demolition, Inc. He cite’s text posted or that was posted at CDI’s website about the serious period of time it took to plan this demolition, which was four months, and the additional 24 days to implement the plan, that is, to put all of the explosive charges, etcetera, in place, for a perfect or quasi-perfect implosive demolition, so that the building (35 stories, 12 short of WTC 7’s height) would come down into its own footprint, like WTC 7 did (and highly the same for towers 1 and 2, we know).

    The heroin trade. Hmmm. He says that the UN reports that the heroin production from the opium produced in Afghanistan has a street value of $130 billion. That doesn’t sound particularly high when considering the costs to U.S. taxpayers for the wars on Afghanistan and Iraq. Oh well, they wouldn’t war for this amount of money. They would, however, if the $130bn was, instead, around $3.6 TRILLION in the stock market after the $130bn or most of it is laundered through BANKS, which is what happens with most of the street-value profits.

    The San Deigo Citizens’ Grand Jury presentation is the following one and its a little over 34 minutes for runtime.

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8665829728276544290#25m

    The expert pilot I said spoke near the end of that video is Ted Muga and the part with him begins at 25:00, or some seconds before, into the clip. The whole video is worth viewing, but I greatly appreciate a highly experienced pilot explaining how or why it’s virtually impossible, quasi-certainly impossible, for the planes to have been hijacked. Nevertheless, both videos are very good, in full.

  3. Pingback: 9/11 Hijackers Not on Flight Manifests? by Jeremy R. Hammond « Dandelion Salad

  4. Pingback: 9/11 Reconstruction: Mental Before Physical by Joel S. Hirschhorn « Dandelion Salad

  5. Pingback: Holder Defends Decision To Try 9/11 Suspects In Federal Court + Revealed: Ashcroft, Tenet, Rumsfeld warned 9/11 Commission about ‘line’ it ’should not cross’ « Dandelion Salad

  6. Pingback: Dr. John McMurtry: Why The Facts of 9/11 Must Be Suppressed – Understanding the Ruling Group Mind Behind the War Without End « Dandelion Salad

  7. Pingback: The Washington Post on ‘lunatic’ 9/11 ‘conspiracy theorists’ by Jeremy R. Hammond « Dandelion Salad

Comments are closed.