[tweetmeme source= “DandelionSalads” only_single=false]
By Tim Karr
Crossposted with permission from Save the Internet
April 7, 2010
“The Day the Internet Lost” read a full-banner headline on Huffington Post yesterday. The New York Times held a wake for the Internet reporting that Internet service providers can now “block or slow specific sites” and demand that content producers now “pay a fee to ensure delivery of material.”
Yesterday, the DC Circuit court took away the Federal Communications Commission’s role as consumer watchdog, protecting our rights on the Internet. The decision has been widely reported as the end of an era for America’s Internet. But what does the future hold? And what can we do to keep the Internet open and democratic?
The ruling sounds an echo of the Supreme Court’s Citizens United v. FEC decision. That ruling in January amounted to a judicial giveaway of our democracy to powerful corporations. Yesterday’s court decision effectively hands the future of communications over to corporations like AT&T, Comcast, Verizon and Time Warner Cable.
This is bad news on several fronts:
Broadband Ambitions Sidelined: High-speed Internet access is a central component to our economic recovery. Putting high-speed Internet into the hands of the third of the country that now does not connect is Priority #1 of the FCC’s National Broadband Plan. The court decision pulls the carpet from beneath the agency’s plan, effectively leaving this essential job to companies that have failed — by almost every international measure — to deliver a fast and affordable services to Americans stuck on the wrong side of the digital divide.
The End of Openness: The decision could mark the beginning of America’s Broadband Dark Age. The court ruled that the FCC has no right to stop carriers from developing a two-tier Internet and blocking Web content that they don’t like. They’ve already indicated their interest in prioritizing content they like at the expense of everybody else. As The Economist reported yesterday an ISP could simply “decide to hijack all search queries… and redirect them to its own search site so it could harvest the extra hits, even when users were attempting to use Google or other search engines.” Nice!
It’s Now Their Internet, Not Yours: The decision could bring us a world where Internet users no longer have control over their Internet experience — where we have no protections against ISPs that abuse our Internet rights at will and without repercussions. Increasingly AT&T, Comcast and Verizon have sought to encroach upon user choice online. Net Neutrality is essential to keeping the future of communications in the hands of all Americans — and preventing ISPs from picking winners and losers on the Web. We’ve just lost that guarantee and it’s only a matter of time before the Great Encroachment begins.
But don’t give up hope. There’s a way out of this legal mess. The easiest route to restore an open Internet is for the FCC to simply vote to reclassify broadband under Title 2 of the Communications Act. This move would return to the agency the powers to protect consumers that it had before Bush-era deregulation struck it down.
Other remedies include a Supreme Court appeal or congressional legislation but, as Prof. Jack Balkin notes, such actions run the risk of a conservative Supreme Court that appears to favor corporations over the public interest. And a move in Congress would require 60 votes from a Senate where passing anything is nearly impossible – much less on an issue over which broadband providers like AT&T and Comcast wield a corrupting level of influence in both parties.
The FCC, however, could reclassify by a simple majority vote of commissioners. Chairman Genachowski has made protecting the open Internet a signature effort of his tenure. He has the support of the majority of FCC commissioners on that. He should now move to reclassify with a simple vote at the agency.
Moreover, the Supreme Court case has specifically said the decision to reclassify is up to the FCC, and as long as the Commission gives good reasons for its choice to do so, that action should be upheld in the courts.
Makes sense, right? That’s why Free Press is pushing full throttle to embolden the FCC to reclassify in a way that allows it to protect Net Neutrality and fulfill the universal access goals envisioned in its National Broadband Plan. (You can join the action here)
In the world of wonky telecommunications policy, reclassification — or returning the Internet to its legal status prior to Bush-era deregulation — is tantamount to declaring World War III with the phone and cable lobby.
That’s a fight that we’re ready to have right now. The future of open communications depends upon it.
Appeals Court Rules FCC Lacks Authority to Enforce Net Neutrality
April 7, 2010
A federal appeals court has ruled the Federal Communications Commission lacks the authority to prevent internet service providers from blocking and controlling internet traffic. The FCC has long sought to force internet service companies to give web users equal access to all websites, a concept known as network neutrality. But the decision grants the companies further control over internet traffic while threatening the future of internet regulation. We speak with Josh Silver, co-founder of FreePress.net. [includes rush transcript]
It’s Our Internet, Not Theirs
An outrageous federal court decision could hand over control of the Internet to companies like Comcast, AT&T and Verizon. The FCC can act to reassert its authority and stand with the nearly 2 million Americans who have demanded Net Neutrality — the one thing stopping these companies from interfering with your experience online.
Thursday deadline: Protect net neutrality
UPDATE: On April 6, the D.C. Court of Appeals issued a ruling that has made this cause more urgent. See below for more information on how this action relates to the court decision.
One of Glenn Beck’s latest conspiracies involves a “gang of communists” who want to turn the Internet into a “Marxist utopia.” That dangerous gang of communists he’s warning Fox News viewers against? They’re net neutrality supporters.