Nov. 30, 2010
Noam Chomsky: WikiLeaks Cables Reveal “Profound Hatred for Democracy on the Part of Our Political Leadership”
In a national broadcast exclusive interview, we speak with world-renowned political dissident and linguist Noam Chomsky about the release of more than 250,000 secret U.S. State Department cables by WikiLeaks. In 1971, Chomsky helped government whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg release the Pentagon Papers, a top-secret internal U.S. account of the Vietnam War. Commenting on the revelations that several Arab leaders are urging the United States to attack Iran, Chomsky says, “latest polls show] Arab opinion holds that the major threat in the region is Israel, that’s 80 percent; the second threat is the United States, that’s 77 percent. Iran is listed as a threat by 10 percent,” Chomsky says. “This may not be reported in the newspapers, but it’s certainly familiar to the Israeli and U.S. governments and the ambassadors. What this reveals is the profound hatred for democracy on the part of our political leadership.”
NOAM CHOMSKY: That essentially reinforces what I said before, that the main significance of the cables that are being released so far is what they tell us about Western leadership. So Hillary Clinton and Benjamin Netanyahu surely know of the careful polls of Arab public opinion. The Brookings Institute just a few months ago released extensive polls of what Arabs think about Iran. The results are rather striking. They show the Arab opinion holds that the major threat in the region is Israel- that’s 80. The second major threat is the United States- that’s 77. Iran is listed as a threat by 10%.
With regard to nuclear weapons, rather remarkably, a majority- in fact, 57–say that the region would have a positive effect in the region if Iran had nuclear weapons. Now, these are not small numbers. 80, 77, say the U.S. and Israel are the major threat. 10 say Iran is the major threat. This may not be reported in the newspapers here- it is in England- but it’s certainly familiar to the Israeli and U.S. governments, and to the ambassadors. But there is not a word about it anywhere. What that reveals is the profound hatred for democracy on the part of our political leadership and the Israeli political leadership. These things aren’t even to be mentioned. This seeps its way all through the diplomatic service. The cables to not have any indication of that.
When they talk about Arabs, they mean the Arab dictators, not the population, which is overwhelmingly opposed to the conclusions that the analysts here- Clinton and the media- have drawn. There’s also a minor problem; that’s the major problem. The minor problem is that we don’t know from the cables what the Arab leaders think and say. We know what was selected from the range of what they say. So there is a filtering process. We don’t know how much it distorts the information. But there is no question that what is a radical distortion is- or, not even a distortion, a reflection–of the concern that the dictators are what matter. The population does not matter, even if it’s overwhelmingly opposed to U.S. policy.
There are similar things elsewhere, such as keeping to this region. One of the most interesting cables was a cable from the U.S. ambassador in Israel to Hillary Clinton, which described the attack on Gaza- which we should call the U.S./Israeli attack on Gaza- December 2008. It states correctly there had been a truce. It does not add that during the truce- which was really not observed by Israel- but during the truce, Hamas scrupulously observed it according to the Israeli government, not a single rocket was fired. That’s an omission. But then comes a straight line: it says that in December 2008, Hamas renewed rocket firing and therefore Israel had to attack in self-defense. Now, the ambassador surely is aware that there must be somebody in the American Embassy who reads the Israeli press- the mainstream Israeli press- in which case the embassy is surely aware that it is exactly the opposite: Hamas was calling for a renewal of the cease-fire. Israel considered the offer and rejected it, preferring to bomb rather than have security. Also omitted is that while Israel never observed the cease-fire- it maintained the siege in violation of the truce agreement- on November 4, the U.S. election 2008, the Israeli army invaded Gaza, killed half a dozen Hamas militants, which did lead to an exchange of fire in which all the casualties, as usual, were Palestinian. Then in December, Hamas- when the truce officially ended- Hamas called for renewing it. Israel refused, and the U.S. and Israel chose to launch the war. What the embassy reported is a grossfalsification and a very significant one since- since it has to do the justification for the murderous attack- which means either the embassy hasn’t a clue to what is going on or else they’re lying outright.
via Noam Chomsky: WikiLeaks Cables Reveal “Profound Hatred for Democracy on the Part of Our Political Leadership”.
Noam Chomsky: WikiLeaks Cables Reveal “Profound Hatred for Democracy on the Part of Our Political Leadership
Watch Part 2: Noam Chomsky on the Economy, US Midterm Elections, Climate Change, and Haiti Part 2
Noam Chomsky: There is a solution to the Israel-Palestine issue
Daniel Ellsberg: The lying is being enforced by the upper levels
Latest WikiLeaks release: US cables leak sparks global diplomatic crisis
Noam Chomsky on the WikiLeaks and Coverage in Press
Noam Chomsky: Pressure Points – How can we promote justice in Israel and Palestine?
Pingback: Wikileaks: Prelude to a new wave of ‘legal’ repression? By William Bowles | Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Cables expose US-Israeli war talks by Bill Van Auken « Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Ron Paul: Where Truth Becomes Treason « Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Wikileaks: Prelude to a new wave of ‘legal’ repression? By William Bowles « Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Wikileaks: Power, Propaganda, and the Global Political Awakening by Andrew Gavin Marshall « Dandelion Salad
Pingback: The Empire strikes back By William Bowles « Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Is the First Amendment Dead & Gone? You bet! by Sibel Edmonds « Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Wikileaks, Imperialism and the Western Media by Sean Fenley « Dandelion Salad
Pingback: The Charade of Israeli-Palestinian Talks by Noam Chomsky + Gaza in Crisis « Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Creative-i : Wikileaks News Roundup 28 December – 7 December, 2010
Pingback: The Anti-Empire Report: WikiLeaks, Iran, TSA, Terrorism, Tea Party & Socialism by William Blum « Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Where to go from Wikileaks? The Peace Movement Responds « Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Wiki-Creep Assange, The Scamp – Pvt. Bradley Manning, the Champ by Greg Palast « Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Larry Wilkerson: Why Might a Saudi King Want the US to Attack Iran? « Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Noam Chomsky on the Economy, US Midterm Elections, Climate Change, and Haiti Part 2 « Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Noam Chomsky: There is a solution to the Israel-Palestine issue « Dandelion Salad