Why are wars not being reported honestly? by John Pilger


by John Pilger
The Guardian
10 December 2010

In the US Army manual on counterinsurgency, the American commander General David Petraeus describes Afghanistan as a “war of perception … conducted continuously using the news media”. What really matters is not so much the day-to-day battles against the Taliban as the way the adventure is sold in America where “the media directly influence the attitude of key audiences”. Reading this, I was reminded of the Venezuelan general who led a coup against the democratic government in 2002. “We had a secret weapon,” he boasted. “We had the media, especially TV. You got to have the media.”

Never has so much official energy been expended in ensuring journalists collude with the makers of rapacious wars which, say the media-friendly generals, are now “perpetual”. In echoing the west’s more verbose warlords, such as the waterboarding former US vice-president Dick Cheney, who predicated “50 years of war”, they plan a state of permanent conflict wholly dependent on keeping at bay an enemy whose name they dare not speak: the public.


via John Pilger: Why are wars not being reported honestly? | Media | The Guardian

NATO Develops Plans For Military Confrontation With Russia In Baltic by Rick Rozoff

Psywar: The Real Battlefield is the Mind

Noam Chomsky: Propaganda and Controlling the Public Mind (1996)

Edward Bernays and the Art of Public Manipulation


Afghanistan on Dandelion Salad


One thought on “Why are wars not being reported honestly? by John Pilger

  1. Pingback: John Pilger: The War You Don’t See (must-see) « Dandelion Salad

Comments are closed.