Kucinich: Does Treatment of Pfc. Bradley Manning Constitute ‘Cruel and Unusual’ Treatment?

https://dandelionsalad.wordpress.com/

by Congressman Dennis J. Kucinich
Washington
Feb. 3, 2011

Free Bradley Manning Rally

Image by mar is sea Y via Flickr

Questions Follow a Report that the Army Ignored Evidence of Mental Health Problems

Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) yesterday wrote to Defense Secretary Robert Gates asking for information about reports that the Army ignored evidence of the mental health problems of Pfc. Bradley Manning, the soldier accused of leaking classified information to WikiLeaks. Kucinich also asked for confirmation and explanation of reports that the Army is holding Pfc. Manning in conditions that would likely exacerbate his condition and could contribute a violation of the his Eighth Amendment right of protection from ‘cruel and unusual’ punishment.

The full text of the letter follows.

February 2, 2011

The Honorable Robert M. Gates
Secretary of Defense
1400 Defense Pentagon
Washington, DC 20301

Dear Secretary Gates:

This morning, The Washington Post reported that Pfc. Bradley J. Manning, the Army intelligence analyst who is accused of being the source of the WikiLeaks documents, was known by the Army to have had mental health problems even before his deployment to Iraq. “At Fort Drum, Manning balled up his fists and screamed at higher-ranking soldiers in his unit….” A “mental health specialist” recommended that he not be deployed to Iraq, “but his immediate commanders sent him anyway….”

In Iraq, evidence of his mental health problems accelerated. “[A] master sergeant who supervised Manning was so concerned about the private’s mental health that he disabled Manning’s weapon in December 2009….” “[I]n May 2010, Manning was demoted a rank for assaulting a fellow soldier….”

The Army ignored Private Manning’s mental health problems before he was arrested for leaking the documents to WikiLeaks, and the consequences of that disinterest are now obvious. Since his arrest, the Army has reportedly treated Private Manning in a way that is almost certain to exacerbate his mental health problems.

In December 2010, Glenn Greenwald reported on the conditions of Private Manning’s confinement at the Marine brig in Quantico, Virginia.

Since his arrest in May, Manning has been a model detainee, without any episodes of violence or disciplinary problems. He nonetheless was declared from the start to be a “Maximum Custody Detainee,” the highest and most repressive level of military detention, which then became the basis for the series of inhumane measures imposed on him.

From the beginning of his detention, Manning has been held in intensive solitary confinement. For 23 out of 24 hours every day — for seven straight months and counting — he sits completely alone in his cell. Even inside his cell, his activities are heavily restricted; he’s barred even from exercising and is under constant surveillance to enforce those restrictions. For reasons that appear completely punitive, he’s being denied many of the most basic attributes of civilized imprisonment, including even a pillow or sheets for his bed…. For the one hour per day when he is freed from this isolation, he is barred from accessing any news or current events programs.

In sum, Manning has been subjected for many months without pause to inhumane, personality-erasing, soul-destroying, insanity-inducing conditions of isolation similar to those perfected at America’s Supermax prison in Florence, Colorado: all without so much as having been convicted of anything. And as is true of many prisoners subjected to warped treatment of this sort, the brig’s medical personnel now administer regular doses of anti-depressants to Manning to prevent his brain from snapping from the effects of this isolation.

On January 3, 2011, the Psychologists for Social Responsibility issued an “Open Letter” in which they protested the conditions of Private Manning’s incarceration “based on the exhaustive documentation and research that have determined that solitary confinement is, at the very least, a form of cruel, unusual and inhumane treatment in violation of U.S. law.” Their Open Letter quotes extensively from the findings of Dr. Craig Haney, “a psychologist and expert in the assessment of institutional environments….”

“Empirical research on solitary and supermax-like confinement has consistently and unequivocally documented the harmful consequences of living in these kinds of environments . . . Evidence of these negative psychological effects comes from personal accounts, descriptive studies, and systematic research on solitary and supermax-type confinement, conducted over a period of four decades, by researchers from several different continents who had diverse backgrounds and a wide range of professional expertise… [D]irect studies of prison isolation have documented an extremely broad range of harmful psychological reactions. These effects include increases in the following potentially damaging symptoms and problematic behaviors: negative attitudes and affect, insomnia, anxiety, panic, withdrawal, hypersensitivity, ruminations, cognitive dysfunction, hallucinations, loss of control, irritability, aggression, and rage, paranoia, hopelessness, lethargy, depression, a sense of impending emotional breakdown, self-mutilation, and suicidal ideation and behavior”

“To summarize, there is not a single published study of solitary or supermax-like confinement in which non-voluntary confinement lasting for longer than 10 days where participants were unable to terminate their isolation at will that failed to result in negative psychological effects.”

Today’s article states that the Army actually recognized that Private Manning had mental health problems, but deployed him to Iraq anyway. Once he was in Iraq, the Army reportedly did not adequately supervise him and allowed his mental health problems to fester. His sergeant recognized that Manning’s mental health was so compromised that he took the unusual step of disabling Manning’s weapon in a war zone.

Now, reports indicate that the Army has taken Pfc. Manning, a soldier with documented mental health problems, and confined him under conditions that are almost guaranteed to exacerbate his mental health problems. If true, the Army’s treatment would obviously constitute “cruel and unusual punishment” in violation of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

If these reports are true, the Army must end the extreme conditions of Private Manning’s confinement, and provide him with the mental health treatment that the Army recognized he needed even before his deployment to Iraq. At the very least, the Army must explain the justification for confining someone with mental health problems under conditions that are virtually certain to exacerbate those problems and explain the danger he now presents that only these extreme conditions of confinement can avoid.

I look forward to your response.

Sincerely,

Dennis J. Kucinich
Member of Congress

see

60 Minutes: Julian Assange Interview

Daniel Ellsberg: We Need Whistle Blowers to Stop Murder

WikiLeaks: Why It Matters. Why It Doesn’t?

Julian Assange on Murdoch, Manning and the threat from China By John Pilger

http://vodpod.com/dandelionsalad/tag/bradley%20manning

http://vodpod.com/dandelionsalad/tag/us+cables+leaked+from+wikileaks

6 thoughts on “Kucinich: Does Treatment of Pfc. Bradley Manning Constitute ‘Cruel and Unusual’ Treatment?

  1. Pingback: Something Rotten in the State of Sweden: 8 Big Problems with the “Case” Against Assange by Naomi Wolf « Dandelion Salad

  2. Pingback: Is this Quantico or Abu Ghraib? by Dennis Kucinich « Dandelion Salad

  3. Pingback: Death Penalty for Bradley Manning, the Alleged WikiLeaks Whistleblower? « Dandelion Salad

  4. Pingback: No Other Way Out by Chris Hedges « Dandelion Salad

  5. Pingback: Behind the Arab revolt is a word we dare not speak by John Pilger « Dandelion Salad

  6. Congressman Kucinich is one of the very few member of the House of Representatives or Senate I have any use for. To get closer to a number of the 535 members of both bodies I do not think more than one per cent are reputable to any degree. So one per cent is 5 members collectively of both bodies. That is a good number to represent what I think of national politicsl. No I am not by any means a Republican I am most definitely a Democrat, by 5 is still a good number. His letter in reference to PFC Mannings incarceration by the Army and the conditions leading up to it fits in with my view of the Army and the Armed Services in general in this country. I still remember what happened when the CIA had those videotapes of the prisoners under torture and the court order and the CIA actions in destroying tapes. The court system did nothing to rectify the situation as I remember after that happened and neither dod the Executive Branc. I see no need to differentiate between the CIA the Army and the other armed forces, obviously they are in charge of the country at the present and have been for a long time, no other part of the goverment would dare tell them what to do and make them do it. They obviously know this and one can see the result. The situation I describe involving the Armed Forces running this country just like they want with no other part of the government daring to do any effective thing is of long standing. I would say it started to firm up into its present state sometime around 1900 and has made tremendous steps toward totalitarianism since then. We have just about totally arrived the situation with Pfc Manning is just the latest of a long line of examples,some much worse than this. I condemn the Armed Forces of this country for developing the situation to where they no longer care to go public with who runs the country like they seemed care for years. I appluade Congressman Kucinich for the great almost unique job he is doing of which his position on the Pfc Manning case and imprisonment is just one of a long list of other cases where he has tried to up hold the rule of law. They have largely all failed as they were sure to do because we in this country have not lived under a discernible rule of law since the end of WW1.

Comments are closed.