Updated: Nov. 21, 2011 added video
by Seymour Hersh
The New Yorker
Nov. 18, 2011
The first question in last Saturday night’s Republican debate on foreign policy dealt with Iran, and a newly published report by the International Atomic Energy Agency. The report, which raised renewed concern about the “possible existence of undeclared nuclear facilities and material in Iran,” struck a darker tone than previous assessments. But it was carefully hedged. On the debate platform, however, any ambiguity was lost. One of the moderators said that the I.A.E.A. report had provided “additional credible evidence that Iran is pursuing a nuclear weapon” and asked what various candidates, upon winning the Presidency, would do to stop Iran.
[…]
***
Updated
democracynow on Nov 21, 2011
While the United States, Britain and Canada are planning to announce a coordinated set of sanctions against Iran’s oil and petrochemical industry today, longtime investigative journalist Seymour Hersh questions the growing consensus on Iran’s alleged nuclear weapons program. International pressure has been mounting on Iran since the U.N. International Atomic Energy Agency revealed in a report the “possible military dimensions” to Iran’s nuclear activities, citing “credible” evidence that “indicates that Iran has carried out activities relevant to the development of a nuclear explosive device.” In his latest article for The New Yorker blog, titled “Iran and the IAEA,” Hersh argues the recent report is a “political document,” not a scientific study, in an interview with Democracy Now! Nov. 21. “They [JSOC] found nothing. Nothing. No evidence of any weaponization,” Hersh says. “In other words, no evidence of a facility to build the bomb. They have facilities to enrich, but not separate facilities to build a bomb. This is simply a fact.”
For the complete report, to read the transcript, download the podcast, and for additional Democracy Now! coverage of Iran and the Middle East, visit http://www.democracynow.org
Seymour Hersh: Propaganda Used Ahead of Iraq War Now Being Reused Over Iran’s Nuke Program
see
IAEA’s “Soviet Nuclear Scientist” Never Worked on Weapons by Gareth Porter
Rick Rozoff: Iraq 2003 – Iran 2011: Parallel That Can Hardly Be Missed
Debunking the Iran “Terror Plot” by Gareth Porter
Pingback: Once Again, War is Prime Time and Journalism’s Role is Taboo by John Pilger « Dandelion Salad
Pingback: “There is No Honor in Police Brutality” by Jill Dalton « Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Ex-Inspector Rejects IAEA Iran Bomb Test Chamber Claim by Gareth Porter « Dandelion Salad
Pingback: U.S. Arms Persian Gulf Allies For Conflict With Iran by Rick Rozoff « Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Nuclear Madness: Iran, Kuwait, or the IAEA? by Felicity Arbuthnot « Dandelion Salad