by Ralph Nader
The Nader Page
February 15, 2013
Image by detailgroesze via Flickr
How could Barack Obama say, in his State of the Union speech, “let’s declare that in the wealthiest nation on earth no one who works full-time should have to live in poverty, and raise the federal minimum wage to $9.00 an hour”?
Back in 2008, Obama campaigned to have a $9.50 per hour minimum wage by 2011. Now he’s settling for $9.00 by 2015! Going backward into the future is the price that poverty groups and labor unions are paying by giving Mr. Obama a free ride last year on this moral imperative. How can leaders of poverty groups and unions accept this back-of-the-hand response to the plight of thirty million workers who make less today than what workers made 45 years ago in 1968, inflation adjusted?
But, of course, the poverty groups and labor unions chose not to mobilize some of the thirty million workers who grow our food, serve, clean up and fix things for us to push for a meaningful increase in the minimum wage before Election Day.
It gets worse. The Obama White House demanded “message discipline” by all Democratic candidates. That meant if Obama wasn’t talking about raising the minimum wage to catch up with 1968, none of the other federal candidates for Congress should embarrass the President by speaking out, including Elizabeth Warren, of all people, who was running for the U.S. Senate from Massachusetts.
It didn’t matter that the U.S. had the lowest minimum wage of any major western country (Australia is over $15, France over $11, and the province of Ontario in Canada is $10.25 – all of these countries also have health insurance for all).
It didn’t matter that several cities and 19 states plus the District of Columbia have higher minimums, though the highest – Washington state – reaches only to $9.19.
It didn’t matter that two-thirds of low-wage workers in our country work for large corporations such as Walmart and McDonald’s, whose top CEOs make an average of $10 million a year plus benefits. Nor did it matter that these corporations that operate in Western Europe, like Walmart, are required to pay workers there much more than they are paying Americans in the United States where these companies got their start.
Haven’t you noticed how few workers there are in the “big box” chain stores compared to years ago? Well, one Walmart worker today does the work of two Walmart workers in 1968. That is called a doubling of worker productivity. Yet, many of today’s Walmart workers, earning less than $10.50 an hour, and are making significantly less than their counterparts made in 1968.
Nobel-Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz, told me that minimum wage policy relates intimately to child poverty. Single moms with children on a shrinking real minimum wage “translates to child poverty” and is “creating another generation” of impoverished people.
The arguments for a higher minimum wage, at least to reach the level of 1968, are moral, political and economic. James Downie writing in The Washington Post provided five reasons to raise the minimum wage:
“1) it will help the economy; 2) it reduces poverty and inequality; 3) it reduces the ‘wage gap’ for women and minorities; 4) indexing the minimum wage is, well, common sense; and 5) it’s consistent with American values.”
Downie gives historical perspective on just how far our economic expectations have slid when he quotes Theodore Roosevelt at the 1912 Progressive Party convention:
“We stand for a living wage…enough to secure the elements of a normal standard of living – a standard high enough to make morality possible, to provide for education and recreation, to care for immature members of the family, to maintain the family during periods of sickness, and to permit a reasonable saving for our old age.”
In the ensuing 100 years, worker productivity has increased about twentyfold. Why then are not most workers sharing in the economic benefits of this productivity? With other worker advocates, we chose to demonstrate on Feb. 12, 2013 before the headquarters of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce whose business coalition opposes increases in the minimum wage while its members report record profits and boss pay. And before the headquarters of the large labor federation – the AFL-CIO – we urged well-paid union leaders to devote more of their power and resources on Congress and the White House to lift up the minimum wage for those they like to call their “brothers and sisters,” from the ranks of the working poor.
The last time – 2007 – a higher minimum wage law was passed under the prodding of the late Senator Edward Kennedy, nearly 1,000 business owners and executives, including Costco CEO Jim Sinegal, the U.S. Women’s Chamber of Commerce CEO Margot Dorfman (two thirds of low-income workers are women), and small business owners from all 50 states signed a “Business for a Fair Minimum Wage” statement.
It read:
“[H]igher wages benefit business by increasing consumer purchasing power, reducing costly employee turnover, raising productivity, and improving product quality, customer satisfaction and company reputation.”
Listen to those words, Walmart! You badly need to improve your reputation, given your recent major missteps.
Catching up with a 1968 federal minimum wage of $10.50, inflation adjusted, should be a winnable goal this year. Once the media starts regularly reporting on the human consequences of unlivable wages, and once the entry of more and more of the thirty million workers to marches, rallies and town meetings grows, neither the Republicans nor the Blue Dog Democrats will be able to stop this drive. Congressional districts all have many such workers in their districts and polls show 70 percent popular support for raising the minimum wage. That includes millions of workers who call themselves conservatives.
The April Congressional recess – the first two weeks of the month – will be the first opportunity to show up where it counts – at the town meetings held by senators and representatives back home. Filling those seats usually requires two to three hundred local voters. If workers rally, by the time the lawmakers go back to Congress, they’ll have a strong wind to their back to face down the lobbies for greed and power, who have money, but don’t have votes.
Check out our website timeforaraise.org and join this long overdue initiative.
***
Updated: Feb. 21, 2013
Will a Higher Minimum Wage Cost Jobs?
TheRealNews·Feb 21, 2013
Bob Pollin on the theory that a higher minimum wage will reduce jobs available to young people entering the work force and won’t reduce poverty.
see
Socialist Register 2013: The Question of Strategy
Chris Hedges: NDAA: All These Laws Are Being Put Through By Design
Breaking the Chains of Debt Peonage by Chris Hedges
Dandelion Salad 
Pingback: You Might Be a Socialist If… by Michael Engel | Dandelion Salad
Pingback: What Socialism is NOT… by Michael Engel | Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Ralph Nader: Income Inequality and The Minimum Wage (HR 1346) | Dandelion Salad
Pingback: It’s time for a raise to $10.50 now! by Ralph Nader | Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Class Struggles in Crisis: From Wal-Mart to the State | Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Defeating Single Issue Politics by Luke Hiken | Dandelion Salad
Pingback: James K. Galbraith: Inequality and Instability: What’s Ahead for the World Economy | Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Moyers and Company: Richard Wolff: Taming Capitalism Run Wild | Dandelion Salad
Without taxes on things we dont believe in, and are even violently against to our bone marrow, we could breath a little easier, and be more empowered to do things about things.
*SOLUTION: Consensual Taxation (ONLY).
Google that, or search right within wordpress here.
We all get itemized multi-choice forms on every last thing they intend to do / build etc charge us taxes for each year. Fund what you believe in, dont what you dont. It eliminates the need for political parties and ‘leaders’ (rulers). The possibilities are endless, such as seeing what top economic class people ‘vote for’ (fund) and annual arsehole awards for being the most ruthless peeping toms and warmongers. Imagine a darwin awards each year for the wannabe godster billionaire who manages to do vastly more harm than good to his fellow man, scientifically tabulated. This is the new pop culture. Dont want forward deployed carriers, dont pay the fuel to be that far out. Think 12 supercarriers is more than enough, dont ‘vote for’ new ones. Many will, but the funds will come up with just enough fuel them (which they really are cool) to ACTUALLY defend our shores.You like ‘abortion stuff’, fund it. If you dont, dont. Want a new 911 investigation, fund it. Want the government to spy on YOU? Fund it; go ahead. You deserve it. Chumps fund a goon squad to oppress your street, fund an anti goon squad. Representatives jobs will be to make sure topics their people bring up come to ‘vote’, and it gets done; honestly & ethically. Not do the ‘voting’ for all-of ‘their’ people, which isn’t even possible. Personal ego zealot driven careering in demagoguery will become obsolete overnight. All the energy that goes into elections a complete and utter WASTE, thats before they’re electioneered and then rigged where needed. We vote for our local guy to go make sure it gets done, and when it isnt, that person might go to prison. Hell I’d take a lynchmob at that juncture, to prevent devloution into what we’re all subject to today.
http://ignoranceisfutile.wordpress.com/2010/07/08/solution-consensual-taxation-only/
Updated this post Feb. 21, 2013. Added video report, “Will a Higher Minimum Wage Cost Jobs?”
Here is a positive approach to labor:
https://dandelionsalad.wordpress.com/2013/02/17/worker-owned-businesses-point-to-new-forms-of-ownership/
Pingback: Worker Owned Businesses Point to New Forms of Ownership « Dandelion Salad
rndyduran – Operating a business is a Privilege and not a right. If a businessman can’t afford to pay his employee’s enough to provide the necessities of life: Food, clothing, shelter, health insurance and transportation plus a little extra while he himself lives like a king than his business deserves to fail.
And working for a business is a privilege as well, not a right. If people do not like what they are getting paid, they are welcomed to quit and seek a better employment.
Todays standard business practice is to overcharge customers and underpay employee’s while funneling the profits into the wallets and bank accounts of CEO’s and other parties. This has the unfortunate effect of slowly recreating the conditions that led to the beheading of the King and Queen of France and the reign of terror during the French Revolution.
Far better for CEO’s to take a well deserved paycut in order to increase the miminum wage instead of their heads along with heads of their families forcefully seperated from their necks.
Workers are being paid much less than 40+ years ago (inflation adjusted); they are also on Food Stamps in record numbers all the while working. That means that the government is supporting individuals and families instead of the businesses.
Businesses who refuse to pay their employees a living wage while forcing them to take government handouts to survive; should have their “Privilege” of operating taken away and given to someone willing to treat their employee’s well by paying them a decent wage.
Yes, exactly. Thank you for all your comments, too.
Your welcome. To put it bluntly to rndyduroran a small business owner who can’t afford a modest increase in the minimum wage doesn’t deserve to be in business anyway.
Minimum wage will lead to a higher unemployment. It might even be so bad that small businesses will have to shut down. If people want a better pay, tell them to get off their a– and get an education and work a bit harder. There are people who argue that families cannot be fed on minimum wage. What the heck are they having families for in the first place. Companies are there to make money correct, or so at least I thought? When companies start to make less money, which will be a result of minimum wage, what happens? People get fired to make that money.
Do you have anything to back up what you are saying?
Please see:
http://socialistworker.org/2013/01/22/lies-about-the-minimum-wage
Its not the increase in the minimum wage that will lead to an increase in unemployment but the desire to raise short term profits – at the expense of lower paid employees – that will then be transferred into the wallets and bank accounts of the few – ceo’s and other higher ups that will lead to an upswing in unemployment.