The Courage of Bradley Manning Will Inspire Others To Seize Their Moment of Truth By John Pilger

Dandelion Salad

by John Pilger
8 August 2013

10 prosecute warmongers

Image by Vertigogen via Flickr

The critical moment in the political trial of the century was on 28 February when Bradley Manning stood and explained why he had risked his life to leak tens of thousands of official files. It was a statement of morality, conscience and truth: the very qualities that distinguish human beings. This was not deemed mainstream news in America; and were it not for Alexa O’Brien, an independent freelance journalist, Manning’s voice would have been silenced. Working through the night, she transcribed and released his every word. It is a rare, revealing document.

Describing the attack by an Apache helicopter crew who filmed civilians as they murdered and wounded them in Baghdad in 2007, Manning said: “The most alarming aspect of the video to me was the seemingly delightful bloodlust they appeared to have. They seemed not to value human life by referring to them as ‘dead bastards’ and congratulating each other on the ability to kill in large numbers. At one point in the video there is an individual on the ground attempting to crawl to safety [who] is seriously wounded… For me, this seems similar to a child torturing ants with a magnifying glass.” He hoped “the public would be as alarmed as me” about a crime which, as his subsequent leaks revealed, was not an aberration.

Bradley Manning is a principled whistleblower and truth-teller who has been vilified and tortured – and Amnesty International needs to explain to the world why it has not adopted him as a prisoner of conscience; or is Amnesty, unlike Manning, intimidated by criminal power?

“It is a funeral here at Fort Meade,” Alexa O’Brien told me. “The US government wants to bury Manning alive.  He is a genuinely earnest young man with not an ounce of mendacity. The mainstream media finally came on the day of the verdict. They showed up for a gladiator match – to watch the gauntlet go down, thumbs pointed down.”

The criminal nature of the American military is beyond dispute. The decades of lawless bombing, the use of poisonous weapons on civilian populations, the renditions and the torture at Abu Graib, Guantanamo and elsewhere, are all documented. As a young war reporter in Indochina, it dawned on me that America exported its homicidal neuroses and called it war, even a noble cause. Like the Apache attack, the infamous 1968 massacre at My Lai was not untypical. In the same province, Quang Ngai, I gathered evidence of widespread slaughter: thousands of men, women and children, murdered arbitrarily and anonymously in “free fire zones”.

In Iraq, I filmed a shepherd whose brother and his entire family had been cut down by an American plane, in the open. This was sport. In Afghanistan, I filmed to a woman whose dirt-walled home, and family, had been obliterated by a 500lb bomb. There was no “enemy”. My film cans burst with such evidence.

In 2010, Private Manning did his duty to the rest of humanity and supplied proof from within the murder machine. This is his triumph; and his show trial merely expresses corrupt power’s abiding fear of people learning the truth. It also illuminates the parasitic industry around truth-tellers. Manning’s character has been dissected and abused by those who never knew him yet claim to support him.

The hyped film, We Steal Secrets: the Story of WikiLeaks, mutates a heroic young soldier into an “alienated… lonely… very needy” psychiatric case with an “identity crisis” because “he was in the wrong body and wanted to become a woman”. So spoke Alex Gibney, the director, whose prurient psycho-babble found willing ears across a media too compliant or lazy or stupid to challenge the hype and comprehend that the shadows falling across whistleblowers may reach even them. From its dishonest title, Gibney’s film performed a dutiful hatchet job on Manning, Julian Assange and WikiLeaks. The message was familiar – serious dissenters are freaks. Alexa O’Brien’s meticulous record of Manning’s moral and political courage demolishes this smear.

In the Gibney film, US politicians and the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff are lined up to repeat, unchallenged, that, in publishing Manning’s leaks, WikiLeaks and Assange placed the lives informants at risk and had “blood on his hands”. On 1 August, the Guardian reported: “No record of deaths caused by WikiLeaks revelations, court told.” The Pentagon general who led a 10-month investigation into the worldwide impact of the leaks reported that not a single death could be attributed to the disclosures.

Yet, in the film, the journalist Nick Davies describes a heartless Assange who had no “harm minimisation plan”. I asked the film-maker Mark Davis about this. A respected broadcaster for SBS Australia, Davis was an eyewitness, accompanying Assange during much of the preparation of the leaked files for publication in the Guardian and the New York Times. His footage appears in the Gibney film. He told me, “Assange was the only one who worked day and night extracting 10,000 names of people who could be targeted by the revelations in the logs.”

While Manning faces life in prison, Gibney is said to be planning a Hollywood movie. A “biopic” of Assange is on the way, along with a Hollywood version of David Leigh’s and Luke Harding’s book of scuttlebutt on the “fall” of WikiLeaks. Profiting from the boldness, cleverness and suffering of those who refuse to be co-opted and tamed, they all will end up in history’s waste bin. For the inspiration of future truth-tellers belongs to Bradley Manning, Julian Assange, Edward Snowden and the remarkable young people of WikiLeaks, whose achievements are unparalleled. Snowden’s rescue is largely a WikiLeaks triumph: a thriller too good for Hollywood because its heroes are real.

This article first appeared in the New Statesman.


An Open Letter to General Buchanan–You Have it Within Your Power to Set the Sentence for Bradley Manning by Peter Hollings

Julian Assange: Bradley Manning Has Become a Martyr + Alexa O’Brien: There’s Been No Actual Harm

Bradley #Manning Not Guilty of Aiding the Enemy + Guilty of 19 Counts

The End of Freedom of the Press by Graham Peebles

Criticizing Military = Aiding the Enemy? Bradley Manning Charge Upheld + Michael Ratner: All Publishers Are At Risk

The Judicial Lynching of Bradley Manning by Chris Hedges

Understanding the Latest Leaks is Understanding the Rise of a New Fascism by John Pilger

8 thoughts on “The Courage of Bradley Manning Will Inspire Others To Seize Their Moment of Truth By John Pilger

  1. Pingback: Cornel West, Chris Hedges, Ann Wright on the Sentencing of Bradley Manning | Dandelion Salad

  2. Pingback: Bradley Manning Sentenced to 35 Years in Prison | Dandelion Salad

  3. Pingback: Screaming in Bradley Manning’s Trial by David Swanson | Dandelion Salad

  4. Pingback: Bradley Manning apologizes to court for ‘unintended consequences’ of his actions | Dandelion Salad

  5. Pingback: Vijay Prashad: Bradley Manning, the Nuremberg Charter and Refusing to Collaborate with War Crimes | Dandelion Salad

  6. Is John (Pilger) talking about the same Nick Davies who wrote “Flat Earth News” published in 2009 ce?

    If so, this seems to be, on the face of it, only about personal jealousy. I’d like to hear from Davies about this ~ if indeed it is the same “award-winning reporter…” that, according to the cover of his book exposed “…falsehood, distortion and propaganda in the global media..” Whose work the Financial Times cites as “important, vital, urgent.”

    Here’s my take on Bradley Manning: he witnessed gratuitous murder, he revealed it.

    Who in their right mind prosecutes & convicts the witness to such a crime? Only under US hoodlum state rules is this travesty and outrage conceivable. Fuck them ~ all of “them.”

    • I’ve looked into this now, so evidently it’s spun out from misinformation about very Swedish silliness. I say silliness, not to diminish or degrade the women implicated, but simply because it is always the obsession with sex that spoils the party, any party.

      So the biggest event in the political economy of media gets reduced to an argument about condoms. Brilliant ~ such clever bonobos we are…

      Pan paniscus is a species Wikipedia describes as ” distinguished by relatively long legs, pink lips, dark face and tail-tuft through adulthood, and parted long hair on its head…” we see their pictures everyday in the tabloid news.

  7. Great article, Bradley Manning, if nothing else revealed other than the Apache helicopter incident, and death revelation to the world, reveals the American administration and the military machine as, ruthless murderers working without conscience and is boggling to the mind of those who still have a mind, that is sane, as to the revelation of who the true terrorists are? As the public see more of what is going on behind the front of Establishment, is it of little wonder the loss of faith, that we are no longer able to trust those who exercise power?

Comments are closed.