In Rush to Strike Syria, U.S. Tried to Derail U.N. Probe by Gareth Porter

by Gareth Porter
Writer, Dandelion Salad
crossposted at ISP
August 27, 2013

Menschenkette: Obama die rote Karte zeigen No War on Syria and Iran

Image by UweHiksch via Flickr

After initially insisting that Syria give United Nations investigators unimpeded access to the site of an alleged nerve gas attack, the administration of President Barack Obama reversed its position on Sunday and tried unsuccessfully to get the U.N. to call off its investigation.The administration’s reversal, which came within hours of the deal reached between Syria and the U.N., was reported by the Wall Street Journal Monday and effectively confirmed by a State Department spokesperson later that day.

In his press appearance Monday, Secretary of State John Kerry, who intervened with U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon to call off the investigation, dismissed the U.N. investigation as coming too late to obtain valid evidence on the attack that Syrian opposition sources claimed killed as many 1,300 people.

The sudden reversal and overt hostility toward the U.N. investigation, which coincides with indications that the administration is planning a major military strike against Syria in the coming days, suggests that the administration sees the U.N. as hindering its plans for an attack.

Kerry asserted Monday that he had warned Syrian Foreign Minister Moallem last Thursday that Syria had to give the U.N. team immediate access to the site and stop the shelling there, which he said was “systematically destroying evidence”. He called the Syria-U.N. deal to allow investigators unrestricted access “too late to be credible”.

After the deal was announced on Sunday, however, Kerry pushed Ban in a phone call to call off the investigation completely.

The Wall Street Journal reported the pressure on Ban without mentioning Kerry by name. It said unnamed “U.S. officials” had told the secretary-general that it was “no longer safe for the inspectors to remain in Syria and that their mission was pointless.”

But Ban, who has generally been regarded as a pliable instrument of U.S. policy, refused to withdraw the U.N. team and instead “stood firm on principle”, the Journal reported. He was said to have ordered the U.N. inspectors to “continue their work”.

The Journal said “U.S. officials” also told the secretary-general that the United States “didn’t think the inspectors would be able to collect viable evidence due to the passage of time and damage from subsequent shelling.”

The State Department spokesperson, Marie Harf, confirmed to reporters that Kerry had spoken with Ban over the weekend. She also confirmed the gist of the U.S. position on the investigation. “We believe that it’s been too long and there’s been too much destruction of the area for the investigation to be credible,” she said.

That claim echoed a statement by an unnamed “senior official” to the Washington Post Sunday that the evidence had been “significantly corrupted” by the regime’s shelling of the area.

“[W]e don’t at this point have confidence that the U.N. can conduct a credible inquiry into what happened,” said Harf, “We are concerned that the Syrian regime will use this as a delay tactic to continue shelling and destroying evidence in the area.”

Harf did not explain, however, how the Syrian agreement to a ceasefire and unimpeded access to the area of the alleged chemical weapons attack could represent a continuation in “shelling and destroying evidence”.

Despite the U.S. effort to portray the Syrian government policy as one of “delay”, the formal request from the United Nations for access to the site did not go to the Syrian government until Angela Kane, U.N. High Representative for Disarmament Affairs, arrived in Damascus on Saturday, as Ban’s spokesman, Farhan Haq, conceded in a briefing in New York Tuesday.

Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Muallem said in a press conference Tuesday that Syria had not been asked by the United Nations for access to the East Ghouta area until Kane presented it on Saturday. Syria agreed to provide access and to a ceasefire the following day.

Haq sharply disagreed with the argument made by Kerry and the State Department that it was too late to obtain evidence of the nature of the Aug. 21 incident.

“Sarin can be detected for up to months after its use,” he said.

Specialists on chemical weapons also suggested in interviews with IPS that the U.N. investigating team, under a highly regarded Swedish specialist Ake Sellstom and including several experts borrowed from the Organisation for the Prevention of Chemical Weapons, should be able to either confirm or disprove the charge of an attack with nerve or another chemical weapon within a matter of days.

Ralph Trapp, a consultant on proliferation of chemical and biological weapons, said he was “reasonably confident” that the U.N. team could clarify what had happened.

“They can definitely answer the question [of] whether there was a chemical attack, and they can tell which chemical was used,” he said, by collecting samples from blood, urine and hair of victims. There was even “some chance” of finding chemical residue from ammunition pieces or craters where they landed.

Trapp said it would take “several days” to complete an analysis.

Steve Johnson, who runs a programme in chemical, biological and radiological weapons forensics at Cranfield University in the United Kingdom, said that by the end of the week the U.N. might be able to answer whether “people died of a nerve agent.”

Johnson said the team, if pushed, could produce “some kind of view” on that issue within 24 to 48 hours.

Dan Kastesza, a 20-year veteran of the U.S. Army Chemical Corps and a former adviser to the White House on chemical and biological weapons proliferation, told IPS the team will not be looking for traces of the nerve gas sarin in blood samples but rather chemicals produced when sarin degrades.

But Kastesza said that once samples arrive at laboratories, specialists could make a determination “in a day or two” about whether a nerve agent or other chemical weapons had been used.

The real reason for the Obama administration’s hostility toward the U.N. investigation appears to be the fear that the Syrian government’s decision to allow the team access to the area indicates that it knows that U.N. investigators will not find evidence of a nerve gas attack.

The administration’s effort to discredit the investigation recalls the George W. Bush administration’s rejection of the position of U.N. inspectors in 2002 and 2003 after they found no evidence of any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and the administration’s refusal to give inspectors more time to fully rule out the existence of an active Iraqi WMD programme.

In both cases, the administration had made up its mind to go to war and wanted no information that could contradict that policy to arise.

Gareth Porter, an investigative historian and journalist specialising in U.S. national security policy, received the UK-based Gellhorn Prize for journalism for 2011 for articles on the U.S. war in Afghanistan.

see also:

Obama set for holy Tomahawk war by Pepe Escobar


Obama’s ‘Guns of August’ by Ed Ciaccio + Take Action

Chemicals Seep Through the Cracks in Western-led Axis Against Syria by Finian Cunningham

The BBC’s Syrian Chemical Weapons Coverage: An Exercise in Imperial Deception By William Bowles (updated)

Saudi Arabia Sponsoring Terrorists Who Kill Muslims by Finian Cunningham

Rick Rozoff: Syria is in a Toe-To-Toe Conflict Between Russia and U.S. + U.S.-Russia Conflict Over Syria: Diplomacy Versus Infantilism

10 thoughts on “In Rush to Strike Syria, U.S. Tried to Derail U.N. Probe by Gareth Porter

  1. Pingback: Obama: You Cannot Start a War by Yourself by Ralph Nader | Dandelion Salad

  2. Pingback: Chemical Hallucinations by William Bowles | Dandelion Salad

  3. Pingback: Western Pathological Liars Hold World To Ransom by Finian Cunningham | Dandelion Salad

  4. Pingback: Opposition to Iraq War May Save Syria by David Swanson | Dandelion Salad

  5. Pingback: US-Israeli False Flag Gas Attack Unravels by William Bowles | Dandelion Salad

  6. Pingback: Rick Rozoff: U.S. Attack On Syria May Cause World War III | Dandelion Salad

  7. Iraq all over again! And the psychopaths pushing for this new conflict will also walk free as all the previous ones. It isn’t the White House, it is the NUT HOUSE.

  8. A cogent summary of a truly dire situation by Gareth Porter.

    The panic in the White House is palpable.

    No sane person would discourage the gathering of some kind of evidence, no matter what. The idea that it should not be done at all flags up a hugely illicit and willful breach of international principle.

    We may not say “law” since the US has already sabotaged any shred of due legality in its scandalous and suicidal conduct overseas. At least Ban Ki-moon is exercising some genuine responsibility and should be commended for not dignifying Kerry’s maniac ranting by deferring to imbecile extremists in suits.

    There can be little doubt that certain elements within the US turkey-shooting fraternity are determined to manifest their most prized ambition, an armageddon theatre “endgame.” These people are clinically unhinged. In fact they should be restrained. It is as though Nostradamus, Napoleon Bonaparte and Jack the Ripper should all be invited to a wild party aboard Trident without their medication.

    This debacle is almost certainly more dangerous than the October ’62 Cuban crisis. Time is standing still. If this is calculated brinkmanship, it is nonetheless exceptionally inappropriate, considering the catastrophic forerunners to this escalation of tensions.

    We cannot trust America, full stop, period. Hague sounds more and more like an impetuous child who has been fed too much aspartame. Cameron is inept. The British opposition is compromised. The BBC is conflicted, and the disinformation industry committee at large, is obsessing about shape-shifting ever more erroneous cows into camels.

    Meanwhile millions are displaced, the number of dead and injured mounts. Ashdown is already ignored. The Arab League special envoy Lakhdar Brahimi is telling everyone more violence will open the abyss…and still the “experts” prattle and and preen in their decorous adornments of death.

    It is sickening. We wait.

Comments are closed.