Image by The Eyes Of New York via Flickr
with Gareth Porter
Writer, Dandelion Salad
Sept. 10, 2013
Some in US Intel. Community Reject Obama Admin Case for Syria Attack
TheRealNews on Sep 9, 2013
Pt 1: Gareth Porter: US Intelligence on Syria “cherry-picked” by proponents of proposed strike
*
Gareth Porter, an investigative historian and journalist specialising in U.S. national security policy, received the UK-based Gellhorn Prize for journalism for 2011 for articles on the U.S. war in Afghanistan.
see
Obama’s Case for Syria Didn’t Reflect Intel Consensus by Gareth Porter
Stopping Barry O’Bomber’s Rush to War by Ralph Nader
Rick Rozoff: U.S. Attack On Syria Would Be Historic Crime
U.S. Gambles On Syria With Empty Hand by Finian Cunningham
see also:
Time to Reveal US Intel on Syria by Ray McGovern
Pingback: Chemical Deal in Syria Could Become Just Another Lever for Western Regime Change by Finian Cunningham | Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Charlie Rose: Media Straight Man for Bashar el-Assad by Cameron Salisbury | Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Noam Chomsky: Instead of “Illegal” Syria Threat, U.S. Should Back Chemical Weapons Ban Worldwide | Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Chris Hedges and Rania Masri on Obama’s Syria Address | Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Leader of Exceptional Nation: U.S. Military Doesn’t Do Pinpricks + Obama’s Speech + Transcript | Dandelion Salad
I just cannot understand how so many otherwise reasonably sane people in the international community are prepared to just accept the assurances of the US and blindly trust in this purported intelligence, when no solid evidence is yet in evidence! In fact, au contraire ~ the finger points persuasively the other way.
One cannot help but surmise that the influence of the pro-zionist Israel lobby is so embedded as to somehow mesmerize opinion. Perhaps the irresistible allure and beneficence of Saudi/Qatar petro-dollars also has something to do with it…
Money and religious guilt ~ they seem to inspire exceptional hypnotic powers.