The US: An Empire or A Bunch of Criminal Lunatics by Daniel N. White

by Daniel N. White
Guest Writer, Dandelion Salad
November 8, 2013

Recently attended a guest lecture/seminar at UT, put out by Jeremy Suri, the rising star of UT’s History department. Topic was “The US—Empire or Umpire?”, and it was yet another rehashing of the question that mainstream poly-sci still kicks around—“Are We an Empire?”. Jeremy Suri, a most personable sort, brought in another mainstream historian, Elizabeth Cobbs Hoffman, to promoter her latest mainstream history/poli-sci tome which argues that the US is not in fact an empire but instead acts abroad as an umpire throughout the world.

There are some excellent lawyerly arguments about how seeing as the US does not enslave the rest of the world for its own financial benefit—this is fundamentally the argument made by Suri and Hoffman—that the US isn’t an empire. Ms Cobbs was proud that in her recent US history classes a majority of the students came in thinking that the US was an empire but left, after a semester of her ministrations, thinking otherwise. How swell. Lawyerly arguments are for lawyers in courtrooms attempting to convince other lawyers who all think along the same narrow lines. Most all lawyerly arguments aren’t but childish quibbles about word definitions. For the rest of us, we are wise to heed the evidence of our senses, and the stirrings of our hearts instead.

The most fundamental evidence of America as empire are the wars we wage abroad. Countries who have done us no injury are so privileged to have the United States wage a war in their distant lands with their inhabitants having no say-so in the matter. The most telling giveaway as to the question of empire is our regard for the inhabitants in those countries who fight on our behalf. Fundamentally, we have none. They are our tools and nothing more.

During the Vietnam War, each and every single week of the war’s casualty lists had South Vietnamese deaths and wounded exceeding ours. Only two weeks in the entire war did American casualties exceed ARVN—the two weeks following the Tet Offensive. South Vietnam, whose population may have been 14 million during the war, paid a terrible butcher’s bill for its leaders assenting to and participating with an American war in their country. Yet how much reportage was there ever in the US press about the Vietnamese army? Its soldiers, their fights, its terrible casualties, the endless war that its soldiers were condemned to– none of whom had a ticket out of the war after a year of it as all American soldiers did. The ARVN troops were mostly all in it for the duration, and they and their sacrifices were ignored mostly entirely by the American press, people, and government. Walter Cronkite would recite their casualty figure once a week, when MACV released the week’s casualty figures, and that was all the attention they got.

The same pattern has been repeated in our recent and ongoing wars in the Middle East. Where are the articles about the Afghan army in American prints? The Iraqi army? We corral the inhabitants in those countries into our schemes for our uses and have paid them and their lives and hopes and their hurts and their deaths no attention, once again, as we did in Vietnam. If we aren’t an empire to behave like this, then we are the cruelest and most heartless race of people wandering the globe.

Below excerpt is from a book I’m reading now. Richard Critchfield was a war reporter in Vietnam and after that wrote several superlative books about rural life, both here in the US and in the Third World. Critchfield recycled the below no doubt from a news story he wrote, and most likely never sold, from his reporter days. Critchfield wrote this in ’65, after he visited Cong Hoa, the ARVN’s largest military hospital. Cong Hoa had been a vacation resort prior to it being turned into a huge ARVN hospital complex. Critchfield writes of a drafted young Vietnamese student he encounters in the hospital there, who has just arrived after a 50 mile ambulance ride.

From Villages, by Richard Critchfield

From pp62-3:

“After he (the ARVN doctor, a civilian doctor drafted into the ARVN six years earlier) read the student’s chart, the doctor’s manner softened. He patted the boy gently on the shoulder and lifted up the cotton sheet from the foot of the stretcher.

“’Foot blown off with a mine,’ he told me in English. He spoke to the boy again in their own language, then turned back. ‘After treatment here, the boy will go back to his unit in My Tho to wait for the local military council to meet. The council will decide whether he can go home or not, of whether he must stay in the army to do some light job. He wants to go home. He should go home. When the wound has healed, we will send him to the rehabilitation department for an artificial limb. He says his wife came south with him. She rents a house outside the camp. They have a two-month old son. It must be a very small house.’ He said that as a private with one son, the boy got the equivalent of eighteen dollars a month; totally disabled, he would get thirty-five dollars a year. The doctor thought there were at least fifty thousand partially disabled veterans in the country already; perhaps it was a blessing he did not know the war would last another ten years.

“The doctor spoke to the boy again. ‘He says he is an infantry rifleman and that he has never killed anybody.’ A wounded sergeant in a nearby stretcher muttered, ‘Who knows where the bullets go?’ The doctor lifted up the bandages from the boy’s forehead; the right eye was shut and swollen. Unclipping an X- ray from the foot of the stretcher and holding it up to the light the doctor motioned me over. The black film showed the boy’s skull; in the black socket of his right eye was a jagged rectangular shape a quarter inch long. ‘Steel fragment. That eye will have to come out.’ An orderly called the doctor and he went away.

“I saw that the boy was moving; painfully, and with great effort, he reached down, groped for the X- ray on his legs where the doctor had left it, clutched it and held it up to the light. We didn’t dare stop him. There was no outcry, just thought—the deep private thought of someone faced with the final, tragic collapse of so much of his life. After a moment he lowered the X- ray carefully back to where it had been, put his head down, and stared upward.

“I told my interpreter to ask if there was anything we could do. At first the boy did not seem to hear. We waited. Then he spoke and said, yes, he wanted to send telegrams to his wife and his mother, who did not know what had happened to him nor where he was. The words started pouring out then; my interpreter could only catch part of it. ‘The war must end…so there is no more killing…so I can go home…I want to go home…I want…my brothers*…’ He was crying hard now and the tears streamed down from his good eye. In shame he tried to dab at them with his pajama sleeve. I thrust some piaster notes into my interpreter’s hand to give to the boy and went outside to stare hard at the hedges shaped like rabbits and elephants.”

Critchfield elsewhere tells another revealing story of Americans at large abroad at war, again from his Vietnam War days. From p. 183 of Villages:

“Tran Van Huong, when prime minister of Vietnam in the 1960’s, once told me no American had ever asked him, ‘What do you need and how can we help you?’”

In all my years of reading about the Vietnam War, I can’t ever recall any other American reporter ever asking any Vietnamese that same question of Critchfield’s. I most rather doubt that any American military officer, USAID worker, or diplomat ever asked that question any time during the war. Maybe some NCO’s in the Army did, but that’s it I bet.

And you know, I can’t recall any American reporter with snap and wit enough to ever ask any Afghan or Iraqi official that same question Critchfield asked the Vietnamese PM back in ’65. If they had they most certainly would have gotten the same answer as PM Huong gave Critchfield in ’65. And again I’ll bet that there was another repeat of nobody beyond the NCO level ever asking for the host country counterpart’s opinion about what they needed that we could give them. And once again, Americans ignore the fact that our butcher’s bill in both these wars is a fraction of our much less populous allies’. Except that this time there isn’t word one ever of the Afghan or Iraqi military casualties in our war in their country in our prints or press. Not even the weekly recitation that Cronkite gave on the 5:00 news. Our uninterest in these people is worse now in our globalized today than it was in our provincial then.

Fifty years on we are doing just the same, treating our third-world ‘allies’ just the same. And our reporters, politicians, academics, and moral leaders are just as blind to it this time around again. They are all content with childish slogans and arguments about us and our goodness. Nguyen Cao Ky was so right when he said that Americans are big children. We have a childish self-centered view of ourselves and we accept childish rationalizations and arguments and we have a childish disregard for our actions and their consequences to others.

Our wars abroad are about us, and our plans and wishes, and aren’t at all for the benefit of the host country and its peoples. That makes us either an empire or a bunch of criminal lunatics. The call is yours; more, the call is theirs, not ours. We should wake up to that fact. Or grow up enough to face it.

*The young ARVN trooper had been a student from a coastal village, youngest of three brothers. Both of his brothers had already been drafted into the ARVN and killed before he was drafted. No sole surviving son deferrals for the ARVN draft.


Empire Under Obama, Part 4: Counterinsurgency, Death Squads, and the Population as the Target by Andrew Gavin Marshall

Empire Under Obama, Part 3: America’s “Secret Wars” in Over 100 Countries Around the World by Andrew Gavin Marshall

Rick Rozoff: Time To Look At Human Dimension As Afghan War Enters Thirteenth Year

Don’t Enlist, But Don’t Just Take My Word For It by Lo

4 thoughts on “The US: An Empire or A Bunch of Criminal Lunatics by Daniel N. White

  1. “John Kerry Then: Hear Kerry’s Historic 1971 Testimony Against the Vietnam War”. He describes the war crimes US soldiers routinely committed in Vietnam.

    It is unfortunate Americans still don’t think there is something wrong with the picture of the richest country with the most powerful military force in the world has waged war only against poor, undeveloped, 3rd world countries since WWII.

    This is a record to be ashamed of, not one to be proud of and boast about.

  2. I’ve had second thoughts for decades about my getting a low draft number (67) after HS graduation in 1970 and manuvering myself out of serving till 1973 when the draft was ended. Even though it was after the heavy boots on the ground involvement I didn’t want to tempt fate.
    In the process of stalling I’d made it my business to find those who’d gone, (for whatever reason), came back in one piece and talk to ’em and ask what they’d seen, and their experience pretty much confirmed the brutality, stupidity and waste of life on BOTH sides, physcial resources, and the beginnings of long individual struggles for most if not all, especially those in ‘the bush’, which some never completed because of the PTSD, or to be succinct, shell shock which drove them to kill themselves. I use the old term because it’s accurate and truthful, but gut wrenching, which I think is appropriate. The term PTSD has sanitized that process, softens the gravity of the effects to those who are for the most part only intellectually involved and in essence makes a lie of the whole situation.
    The ugly reality of war for the grunts hasn’t changed from Critcfields day, but unfortunately the self serving mindless flag waving is even more entrenched than what I remember experiencing in the mid 1960’s from both the media and the fools (my judgement) that gladly went along with it.
    I think it was a fear of my life that drove me to find those who’d fought and tell me what they’d seen/done and to confirm, if it were true, the savegery, butchery. Unfortunately it was what I’d thought it might be from what I could ‘dope out’ from the media. That war, and it was a war, like most other wars, was a manipulation of/by the politicos (in this case DC) for their handelers benefit.
    Last thing I wanted was to get shot up in a rice paddy so a greedy capitalist arms dealer could make beau coup bucks producing the devices that would make my life a livin’ hell after one of them had insulted my body.
    Even 40 years on there’s guilt for the way things worked out. As an innocent 18 year old, thrown to the wolves of society at large by my biological family only because I attained the age of ‘majority’, I neither had the intellectual or emotional resources to be put in a position nor wanted to be where I was forced to find the truth about the gov’t and in some ways some of the people in the country I’d grown up in. That it (the gov’t) was outright lying, and other sundry forms of manipulating information. At least back in the day you could see the body bags come home, dumbass ‘W’ officially put a stop to that, and with that you could have the chance of making an informed decision as to what you believed about war in general, and way back when, Nam.
    Another thing is when one finds out the real ‘reality’ of a situation you can tell those who for the most part created it to stop, and protests, both small and big of that time were everwhere. In fact so much so that once ‘Tricky Dicky’ Nixon was sayin’ to Henry Kissinger about a protest at the White House which was surronded by buses to keep the protestors out, in a scared shitless tone of voice what if the get through. That’s the position you want them “ho’s” in gov’t to be, so they do the bidding of the majority, which in this case was fed up in sacrificing their young for the profit of others.
    After that chapter, things became more difficult because there were internal dynamics affecting me that even I couldn’t realistically verbalize, not less deal with. Now this is projection, but given the draft experience, and then finding out about and having to deal with my useless family I problaly would have been a wash out with the military which would have added more burden to an allready out of control life.
    Now what does that mean or say. For one thing, I hope that todays 18 year olds are a whole lot smarter both intellectually and emotionally to see the reality of the gov’t, and to learn from the hell I and others went thru decades ago to not repeat the same mistakes both individually and with that, to change policy on a national level when it comes to the gov’t insatiable thirst for war profits.
    One is gonna get old eventually, that is if you believe the research stats about longevity, and more than likely you’ll be faced with sickness (independent of the ravages of war) that you’d never dreamed of which will, to put it in the vernacular ‘kick your ass’ one way or the other. So, take from an ol’ fart, even tho I’ve not gone thru the military you don’t need the experience of shootin’ at somebody directly or doin’ somebody in indirectly like with land mines, or gettin’ the same in your direction.
    You’ll be challenged in unimaginable ways that’ll test your mettle and you’ll need your wits about ya to deal with them.
    Like the old poster said, “War isn’t good for living things” and that’s the truth no matter who you are, where you come from, if you’re financially well off, poor, educated or not.
    Like General Smedley Butlers book title says, “War is a Racket”, and ain’t that one of lifes ultimate truths. Keep it in mind when the powers that be try to sell you on its folly.

Comments are closed.