Ukraine: The Dangers of Dealing with Delusional Western Leaders + Putin Holds Aces, Obama Deuces by Finian Cunningham

by Finian Cunningham
Writer, Dandelion Salad
East Africa
Crossposted from Strategic Culture Foundation
March 4, 2014

Fittingly, given the coincidence of the US cinema Oscars ceremony held at the weekend, American politicians and their Western allies were also starring in bravura performances of hypocrisy and double think with regard to their denunciations of Russia’s recent security response to chaos in Ukraine.

Increased military maneuvers apparently by Russian troops in Ukraine’s southern Crimean Peninsula over the weekend were met with strutting over-the-top reactions from Washington and other Western members of the so-called Group of Eight economic nations.

The US, Britain, France and Canada said they were canceling plans to attend the G8 summit to be held in Sochi later this June in protest over what they said was Russia’s “violation of Ukraine’s sovereignty”. German Chancellor Angela Merkel declined to endorse calls for Russia’s suspension from the G8, however the German leader in a phone call with American President Barack Obama complained that the Russian head of state, Vladimir Putin, was “living in another world”, according to the New York Times.

British Prime Minister David Cameron said he agreed with Obama’s earlier admonition to Russia that there “must be significant costs” imposed on Moscow for its military actions in Crimea.

French President Francois Hollande issued a statement urging Putin to “not use force” in any involvement of Russian troops on Ukrainian territory. That’s a nice touch of self-parody from Hollande given that he ordered hundreds of French troops into the Central African Republic in recent months – an intervention that sparked thousands of deaths from sectarian clashes between Muslim and Christian communities there and which has now resulted in a full-blow humanitarian crisis in that country.

While Cameron and Obama talk about “significant costs” to be sanctioned against Russia for troop movements in Crimea – during which not a single shot was fired nor has anyone been injured – both British and American leaders continue to have evaded prosecution for illegal wars of aggression in Afghanistan and Iraq where more than one million people have died and millions more wounded and displaced.

But the star political performer among the Western hypocrites was American Secretary of State John Kerry. His botox treatment may limit facial movements, but Kerry’s rhetoric made up for that in playing to the gallery. He denounced to US media what he called “incredible, brazen aggression” by Russia towards Ukraine.

“You just don’t invade another country on phoney pretext in order to assert your interests”, said Kerry. “This is an act of aggression that is completely trumped up in terms of its pretext. It’s really 19th century behaviour in the 21st century”.

These words come from the top diplomat of a country that has used countless phoney pretexts – from weapons of mass destruction to humanitarian protection – to subvert and invade other sovereign states, inflicting millions of deaths; not just in the distant past but right now in the present with regard to covert operations and sanctions in Syria, Iran, Somalia, Yemen, Pakistan, among other places.

And, irony of irony, the most pertinent location for US-led subversion is Ukraine. The ousting of the elected government in Ukraine last month follows months, and indeed years, of American-sponsored destabilization that has culminated in a new unelected regime composed of neo-Nazis and other fascist thugs.

Kerry is to travel this week to Kiev “in a gesture of support” for the US-backed new regime, which is headed up by so-called interim Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk. The junta in Kiev has key cabinet posts occupied by members of the neo-Nazi Svoboda party, including those for national security, armed forces and justice. The Washington-backed cabal in Kiev follows the script outlined by Kerry’s underling Victoria Nuland last month in a phone call to the US ambassador to the Ukraine, and it came into being under the threat of further violence from the fascist thugs who manhandled the elected President Viktor Yanukovych out of office at the end of February…

The mob-rule that Washington and its European and NATO allies spent months agitating for has consequently thrown Ukraine into chaos and violent uncertainty. Pro-Russian populations in the East and South of the country have taken to the streets demanding protection from the CIA-backed far-right militias that have usurped power in Kiev. The sense of fear gripping Ukraine is not just a product of fevered imagination or Moscow’s political rhetoric. The cadres of Svoboda and its Right Sector paramilitaries have publicly warned of ethnic cleansing against Ukraine’s Russian communities as well as any other perceived political enemies. Officials among Yanukovych’s Regions Party have been wounded in gun attacks.

Yet the authors of this coup d’état in Ukraine – Washington and its NATO allies, along with their dutiful Western news media – now accuse Russia of violating sovereignty and “bringing the region to the brink of war”. NATO chief Anders Fogh Rasmussen has even charged that “Russia is threatening peace in Europe”.

This inflammatory rhetoric was ramped up by the Western-installed puppet leader Yatsenyuk, who accused Moscow of “an act of war against my country”. Ukraine is not a member of NATO, but new admissions to the organization, Poland and Lithuania, have claimed that they are threatened by the movement of Russian troops in the Crimean Peninsula. In theory, the 28-member NATO could invoke a military response under its umbrella defence obligations.

However, for now, US officials are playing down a resort to military action. John Kerry told American media at the weekend that “all options were on the table” but he added: “The last thing anybody wants is a military option in this kind of situation.”

Unlike Washington’s numerous “trumped-up” and murderous military interventions around the globe, Russia can very well argue that the chaos unleashed in Ukraine by Western destabilization has clear and present dangers to its vital national interests.

Russia’s long-standing bilateral agreement with the Ukraine on the use of Crimea as a naval base for its Black Sea Fleet gives Moscow a legal prerogative to protect its military installations there. The newly formed parliament in the autonomous Crimean Republic has also called upon Russia for protection of its citizens – 60 per cent of whom are ethnic Russians.

The Russian parliament’s vote at the weekend to give President Putin powers to send troops into Eastern Ukraine could also be enacted with legal validity given the lawlessness on the streets that have ensued from the coup d’état in Kiev.

What is needed to avoid a military conflict between the West and Russia over events in Ukraine is a clear and honest assessment of what has led up to this point. It is only adding to the problem when Western leaders and media engage in outrageous hypocrisy, double standards and deception on the causes of the present crisis. An example of this delusional thinking can be seen in how the New York Times reported on the latest developments in Crimea.

The New York Times editorialized: “[Putin’s] strategy has been pursued aggressively by subterfuge, propaganda and bold military threat… aimed at blunting the impact of a popular uprising [in Ukraine] that sought to push the country away from Russia and deepen ties with Europe”.

A popular uprising? By neo-Nazis and gun-wielding fascists under the tutelage of the CIA? What about provable Western subterfuge and propaganda? Can this newspaper – America’s supposed premier quality publication – be for real?

Such a portrayal of events in Ukraine and its repercussions is sheer fantasy that conceals the very real and unlawful interference in that country by Western governments. Of course, we should not be surprised; the Western media is in the business of selling phoney pretexts for illegal US-led wars. Indeed, Western media are fully complicit in the war crimes committed by Washington and London in Iraq and Afghanistan and elsewhere; and yet they piously continue to churn out their mendacity with impunity, as in the case of Ukraine.

If that is how Western politicians and their media choose to falsify the grave situation in Ukraine, then it does not bode well for a reasonable, diplomatic resolution. How can meaningful dialogue be conducted with such idiocy?

The disturbing aspect about Western leaders’ reaction to the problems that they have themselves directly created in Ukraine and the wider region is that these people are not merely acting dumb.

The breath-taking hubris demonstrated by Kerry, Obama, Cameron, Hollande and Merkel et al is not an Oscar-winning “performance”. These people actually seem to believe their own nonsense. And that mental vacuity makes for a very dangerous collision course.


Putin Holds Aces, Obama Deuces

by Finian Cunningham
Writer, Dandelion Salad
East Africa
Crossposted from PressTV
March 3, 2014

As Russian troops pour into Ukraine consolidating control over the southern Crimea region it looks as if President Putin has finally had enough of playing games according to bent Western rules.

Vladimir Putin knows that world public opinion and a good many nations are on Russia’s side in its show of strength against the cabal of rogue Western states led by Washington.

The morally bankrupt Western cabal tried to play its “sanctimonious card” at the weekend after Putin ordered more troops into the southern Ukrainian territory. American President Barack Obama said with tiresome cliché “the US stands with the international community in condemning violation of Ukraine’s sovereignty”.

Even more absurdly, US Secretary of State John Kerry later lambasted Russia’s “brazen aggression”. With a ridiculous straight face, probably due to years of botox treatment, Kerry said:

“You just don’t invade another country on phoney pretext in order to assert your interests. This is an act of aggression that is completely trumped-up in terms of its pretext. It’s really 19th century behaviour in the 21st century.”

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov shot back that US threats of sanctions and veiled military confrontation against Moscow are “completely unacceptable”.

And the subsequent increase in Russian troop deployment in the Crimea seems to be a clear sign that Moscow is snubbing Washington’s warnings with the contempt that they deserve.

For a start, Russia knows that it is morally and legally right to make its latest moves. With a Russian ethnic population comprising up to 60 per cent of the Ukraine, particularly in the East and South of the country, Moscow has a responsibility to protect its compatriots in a territory with a long shared history and heritage. Russia has real vital national interests at stake in the Ukraine, and it is entitled to exercise this protection – unlike countless American trumped-up interventions around the globe.

Secondly, Russia knows that the phoney American rulers and their European proxies have been making a mockery of international law in Ukraine over many years and especially in the last three months, during which the West has inflamed social and political unrest to the point where the elected authorities in Kiev were ousted two weeks ago in a Western-backed coup d’état. It is only Western rulers and their delusional media who pretend that the events in Ukraine were “a popular uprising”.

The American, British, French and German governments have orchestrated a regime change operation, which now sees a rabble of neo-Nazis and fascists in power in Kiev. The rabid anti-Russian politics of this Western-backed junta poses a real and present threat to the pro-Russian population. True to plan, this junta of unelected quislings who came to power on the back of murderous street violence – violence fully supported and encouraged by the Western states – will in short order give the green light to NATO troops being stationed on Russia’s borders.

A third factor emboldening Putin to act decisively in a show of strength against these Western powers is that the Russian leader knows that world opinion is on his side. The world has had enough of US-led state terrorism and lawlessness, declaring war on countries on trumped-up pretexts, including Iraq and Afghanistan, where more than one million have been killed by American and British forces with total impunity. These illegal wars of aggression were based on proven outright lies and fabrications with the collusion of Western media.

The world has had it with US-led aggression against Iran with murderous sanctions that, again, are based on wanton and transparent lies that infringe on the legally entitled rights of the Iranian nation to develop nuclear technology.

The world is sickened by American sponsorship of the genocidal Israeli regime against the Palestinian people – a grotesque regime whose illegal stockpile of nuclear weapons is an affront to international law and morality.

And the world is abhorred by the US-led covert war of aggression on Syria for the past three years, conducted with the help of Arab despots and head-choppers, which has resulted in over 130,000 deaths and millions thrown into abject misery.

More than anything perhaps, the world, including many ordinary Americans, is disgusted by the shameless deception, double standards and hypocrisy of Washington and its European acolytes who claim to represent decency, democracy and the “international community”.

In a hollow headline, the London Financial Times claimed: “World rounds on Russia over Crimea move”. This is typical Western elite vanity that presumes to speak for the world majority.

The New York Times added: “So far, the Kremlin has shown no sign of yielding to international pressure”.

What international pressure? The only people that seem to be in a fluster are the elites in Washington and their slavish coterie of European stooges in London, Paris and Berlin.

In actuality, the world has pointedly remained muted on Russia’s moves to defend its interests in Ukraine. China, now the world’s biggest trading nation, has indeed sided with Russia. India and the other members of the Non-Aligned Movement have made no comment.

This is because the majority of the world knows who the real aggressors are. The latter are the US and its cronies among the financially and morally bankrupt G7 capitalist club of elite mis-rulers.

With Russia supplying up to 35 per cent of Europe’s oil and gas, Moscow knows too that it holds an important ace in this new game. If the EU is foolish enough to push Washington’s asinine agenda against Russia over the unrest and violence in Ukraine – which the US and the EU instigated in the first place – then Moscow can bring bankrupt Europe to its knees by turning off the fuel taps.

The old game of one-sided, bent rules – long played by Washington and its Western allies – is over. There’s a new game in town, and where Putin has a few aces to play, the bankrupt West is holding a bunch of deuces.

Finian Cunningham, is a columnist at Press TV, the Strategic Culture Foundation and a Writer on Dandelion Salad. He can be reached at


Lighting The Fires For Chaos In Ukraine by Bruce Gagnon

Rick Rozoff: Ukraine: A Nazi-like Victory of US/NATO Lawlessness + Kerry tells Russia ‘one doesn’t invade country on phony pretext’

Preparing For War With Russia by Bruce Gagnon

Putin Faces Down Obama Over Ukraine by Finian Cunningham

The US Arrogance Stirs Me by Bruce Gagnon

10 thoughts on “Ukraine: The Dangers of Dealing with Delusional Western Leaders + Putin Holds Aces, Obama Deuces by Finian Cunningham

  1. Pingback: Statement by the Press Secretary on the Visit of Prime Minister Yatsenyuk of Ukraine | Dandelion Salad

  2. Pingback: Look in the Mirror, US, EU–Don’t Blame President Putin | Dandelion Salad

  3. Pingback: Washington’s Hysteria Towards Russia Hides US Regime Change | Dandelion Salad

  4. Pingback: US Provokes Russia, Acts Surprised to Get a Nasty Reaction | Dandelion Salad

  5. Pingback: The Proof is in the Pudding by Bruce Gagnon | Dandelion Salad

  6. Pingback: Ukraine: CIA coup, geopolitical analysis, and WWIII | Writings of J. Todd Ring

  7. Pingback: Boxing In The Bear by Bruce Gagnon | Dandelion Salad

  8. With the demise of the military Warsaw Pact, all the buffer states between West Germany and Russia have been absorbed into the NATO orbit.

    The Ukraine is the last buffer between NATO and Russia. There is no doubt Washington wants NATO right on Rusia’s border, and with all the “Red Lines” being drawn dividing this world, Putin has drawn his so
    NATO will not extend to the border of Russia.

    When the US withdrew from the Antiballistic Missile Treaty in 2001, it was to deploy a missile system facing Russia in a former Warsaw Pact Nation now in NATO. Russia rightly saw that as an aggressive, provocative act by NATO.

  9. Actually it’s laughable, talk about fascist pots calling out black Russian kettles!

    Does anyone honestly believe that the Kremlin can just look the other way with respect to its Sevastopol navy base?

    This situation is utterly surreal, as though the make-believe-lets-pretend-fantasy-world spun by Washington’s demented visionaries and their salivating media-mongers has any credibility whatsoever; or that the miraculously “youthful” botox-ic black-belted boss in Moscow knows a better way of doing what Russians always do so well, exercise brute force ~ except this time, it may be legally and constitutionally justifiable, despite Abby Martin’s principled protest.

    Evidently RT are sending her to Crimea to get a fresh perspective. I trust for her sake she doesn’t have to face any of those fascist extremists who seem to be so happy to do the bidding of Obama’s mob-paymasters. It will certainly be interesting to hear what she finds out ~ only I’d like to think she will be responsibly protected.

Comments are closed.