by Felicity Arbuthnot
Writer, Dandelion Salad
October 12, 2017
When US Ambassador to the UN, Nikki Haley, stated of North Korea (4th September 2017): “When a rogue regime has a nuclear weapon and an ICBM pointed at you, you do not take steps to lower your guard. No one would do that”, she unwittingly put her finger on why the DPRK has been conducting missile tests and stating that they have ever bigger, better and longer range capabilities. There is no certainty that either of the latter is the case, but the tiny country has been subject to nearly seventy years of vilification and ever more threatening behavior from the US and allies, with the language of Donald Trump, from near day one of his Presidency of the US regime reaching ever more apocalyptic heights.
UN Secretary-General António Guterres has stressed that dialogue and communication are vital:
“Confrontational rhetoric may lead to unintended consequences. The solution must be political. The potential consequences of military action are too horrific.”
One can only hope “diplomat” Haley – who told the UN Security Council: “The time has come to exhaust all of our diplomatic means …” and that North Korea was “begging for war” – was listening. This of a country which in living memory had every town, village and it’s capitol city near erased from the map by the United States and lost at least twenty percent, some estimates state nearer thirty percent, of it’s population of then just nine million people.
In 1953 when the US had destroyed all and there was nothing left to bomb they turned to bombing the dams, flooding the rice fields and causing starvation. North Korea’s government and the country’s collective and inherited memory have not forgotten and are simply attempting to insure such a horror never again afflicts their small nation.
There has been no empathy, knowledge of history, compassion in the Trumposphere. The five times draft dodger, has threatened “fire and fury” along with legality-detonating assassination of the Head of State, referring to him as “Little Rocket Man”, adding that he and his government: “won’t be around much longer.”
Trump is also threatening generating the potential extinction of life on earth. His obsession with “if we’ve got nuclear weapons why don’t we use them” argument goes back decades – but his kindergarten level rhetoric shows a frightening disconnect from statesmanship, diplomacy – and reality. This is not conjecture. Twenty-seven eminent psychiatrists have put their reputation on the line writing in the just published book The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump “that he is dangerously mentally ill and presents a clear and present danger to the nation … (exploring) Trump’s symptoms and potentially relevant diagnoses (they) find a complex, if also dangerously mad, man.”
When Secretary of State Rex Tillerson told journalists whilst on a recent visit to Beijing that the State Department had: “a couple of, three channels open to Pyongyang” and “We can talk to them … we do talk to them”, Trump tweeted: “save his energy” as “we’ll do what has to be done!”
“I told Rex Tillerson, our wonderful Secretary of State, that he is wasting his time trying to negotiate with Little Rocket Man,” wrote the President from his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey. How cheap human life is to a man who has never witnessed, indeed five times evaded, seeing the carnage even one bullet can do. In context, it has just come to light that:
“President Donald Trump said he wanted what amounted to a nearly tenfold increase in the U.S. nuclear arsenal during a gathering this past summer of the nation’s highest ranking national security leaders, according to three officials who were in the room ….
“According to the officials present, Trump’s advisers, among them the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, were surprised. Officials briefly explained the legal and practical impediments to a nuclear buildup and how the current military posture is stronger than it was at the height of the build-up. In interviews, they told NBC News that no such expansion is planned.
“The July 20 meeting was described as a lengthy and sometimes tense review of worldwide U.S. forces and operations. It was soon after the meeting broke up that officials who remained behind heard Tillerson say that Trump is a ‘moron.’ “
Trump has vociferously denied the report, predictably falling back on his seemingly miniscule vocabulary and calling it “fake news”, even threatening the broadcaster’s licence. So far he hasn’t threatened to nuke their New York headquarters.
Back to North Korea and the President’s chilling ignorance. On 1st October he tweeted: “Being nice to Rocket Man hasn’t worked in 25 years, why would it work now? Clinton failed, Bush failed, and Obama failed. I won’t fail.”
Kim Jong-un is thirty three and was formally announced as his father’s successor on 26th December 2011. He has thus been power just short of six years. Twenty five years ago would have been eight years old.
The US simulates invading North Korea annually. In the last such manoeuvres in August one South Korean defense official told the newspaper Chosun Ilbo that this year’s exercises would include: “a nuclear war game for the first time.”
Currently, in addition to the massive war games, the US has been overflying North Korea with B-52 bombers, with further exercises taking place in and with South Korea and in the last days also with Japan. It should also be remembered that the US has in the Pacific: “Total military personnel, 87,000” [see rest of the statistics on this graphic on US in the Pacific].
Moreover, as has been pointed out: “In Donald Trump’s first six months in office, he dropped over 20,650 bombs in approximately seven countries, which killed thousands of civilians. By comparison, Kim Jong-un bombs the ocean.”
The same source makes a vital point, ignored by media and politicians:
“The media’s insistence that North Korea will never give up its weapons systems is completely disingenuous when one reads the entire context of the statements offered by Kim Jong-un’s government. On July 4, Kim’s statement read as follows:
“The DPRK would neither put its nukes and ballistic rockets on the table of negotiations in any case nor flinch even an inch from the road of bolstering the nuclear force chosen by itself unless the U.S. hostile policy and nuclear threat to the DPRK are definitely terminated.” [emphasis added]
Indeed – and with arch hawk retired Lt. Colonel Ralph Peters writing an op-ed in the New York Post (4th September): “Better a million dead North Koreans than a thousand dead Americans” and with the Pyongyang government and people well aware of what happened to Libya which was persuaded to give up its weapons programme and Iraq which had done the same after 1991. Of course Kim Jong-un and his colleagues are going to try to persuade that they can give as good as they fear getting in hope of avoiding annihilation.
Given the reckless rhetoric of Trump and others, as the New York Times puts it:
“Congress has been sufficiently alarmed to consider legislation that would bar the president from launching a first nuclear strike without a declaration of war by Congress.
“ … As things stand now, the Atomic Energy Act of 1946, passed when there was more concern about trigger-happy generals than elected civilian leaders, gives the president sole control. He could unleash the apocalyptic force of the American nuclear arsenal by his word alone, and within minutes.”
“A New York Times analysis found the U.S. could use 1,103 nuclear warheads and decimate China, Russia, North Korea, Iran, Libya, Iraq, and Syria … and still have 2,897 left.” [emphasis added]
Given that the man who tweets casually about “fire and fury” and smirks as he talks of “calm before the storm”, took the nuclear “football” (briefcase) down to his Florida Mar-a-Lago resort and allowed its minder to have “selfies” taken with it, him and guests, it seems pretty clear that the current incumbent of the White House still resides in the fantasy land of reality shows with no grasp of the potential global pyromaniacal armageddon he jokes about unleashing. Twenty-seven eminent psychiatrists of course, have far more disturbing diagnoses.
Apparently he likes watching movies. Perhaps someone should give him a copy of “The Day After“.
from the archives:
Anglo-American War Plan for North Korea by Finian Cunningham
Why United States Is the Fourth Reich by Finian Cunningham
Korea Solution Needs US to Sign a Peace Treaty by Finian Cunningham + Wilkerson: Trump a ‘Diplomatic Fiasco’ at the UN
John Pilger: The Problem is Not North Korea, Not Russia, Not China, The Problem is The United States
Stop Allowing YOUR Emperor to Threaten Nuclear Apocalypse by David Swanson + Larry Wilkerson: North Korea is Not an Existential Threat
Can Another War in Korea Be Avoided? by Ariel Ky + Gareth Porter: The US has a Dominance Problem
This Time The Target Is North Korea by Felicity Arbuthnot + Bruce Gagnon: This Whole Pivot is Aimed at Russia and China
Paul Street: This is the Most Inflammatory Rhetoric I’ve Heard From a US President in My Lifetime
Pingback: Regulating Apocalypse by David Swanson – Dandelion Salad
Pingback: Radiation Leak Fears After the Collapse of a Tunnel in North Korea by Felicity Arbuthnot – Dandelion Salad
Pingback: North Korea: A Threat Or A Victim? by Felicity Arbuthnot – Dandelion Salad
Pingback: North Korea Still Struggles with America’s Lethal Legacy by Felicity Arbuthnot – Dandelion Salad
U.S. policy is to keep all the world aflame and divided. This was explicitly stated in WW2 propaganda reels like Why We Fight episode 7, 54:00, with the breathless narrative accompanying those graphics — a united Asia would give 7/8ths of the world population against the U.S. The WW2 generation are gone, but installed generations of single-minded lackeys like Rumsfeld and Cheney, with the notorious “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” doctrine that no rival ever be allowed to exist. https://youtu.be/htBAhYWQ6jk?t=53m40s
Pingback: Anglo-American War Plan for North Korea by Finian Cunningham – Dandelion Salad
Finian Cunningham is arguing in Strategic Culture that the US and Britian are preparing for war against North Korea. I don’t think so, this is just the usual bluster. China would not allow US troops on its border near its capital Beijing. If it were attempted, it would mean war with China, as occurred in the last Korean war, only now China is much, much stronger. So what would be the point of bombing and shelling exchanges, especially nuclear ones.
Trump has to maintain to his base of Trumpsters that he is really Tough and Manly, not tolerating the impudence of such a small country. The USA generally goes to big war under the Democrats, Obama expanding the wars of Bush jnr. War under the Dems, repression under the Repubs, US form of Freedom&Democracy. He’ll most likely continue to bloviate while cutting taxes for the rich and impoverishing the American people.
A far more dangerous threat of war is one against Iran. His billionaire backers include ardent Zionists who are pressing him to break the nuclear pact and to attack Iran. There the risk of war is against Russia rather than China, and would serve the interests of Israeli imperialism along with Saudi Arabia and other oil states.
Good point, folktruther.
I’m posting Finian’s piece tomorrow. I’ll add the link here for others to read.
Here’s the link to Finian’s article: https://dandelionsalad.wordpress.com/2017/10/13/anglo-american-war-plan-for-north-korea-by-finian-cunningham/