Abby Martin: Biden’s Doublespeak About Ending Yemen War

002 Rally 2017

Image by Felton Davis via Flickr

Dandelion Salad

with Abby Martin

Empire Files on Feb 11, 2021

Abby Martin explains what President Biden really means by the duplicitous language in his major Feb. 4 foreign policy speech on ending the Yemen war.

Keep Empire Files independent and ad-free:

From the archives:

Abby Martin: Afghanistan Mercenary Shocker + US Says Nuclear War “Very Real Possibility”

Vijay Prashad: The Democratic Party and the War Machine

Abby Martin: Biden’s Scary Foreign Policy Picks

Biden’s Actions So Far Would Have Ye Olde Resistance in the Streets If He Were Republican, by David Swanson

Danny Haiphong and Margaret Kimberley: Biden Could Be One Of The Most Dangerous Presidents Ever

Everything Will Fundamentally Change, by David Swanson

Abby Martin: It’s Just Mind-Boggling that the Democrats Continue to Support Trump’s Worst Foreign Policy Blunders and Policies

Christian Sorensen: War Industry Muster–Intro to Foreign Military Sales (FMS)

Caleb Maupin: Who are “Houthis”?

What Should We Do Instead Of Bombing Yemen? Not Bomb Yemen! by David Swanson

9 thoughts on “Abby Martin: Biden’s Doublespeak About Ending Yemen War

  1. Pingback: Abby Martin: Biden’s Obscene Military Budget – Dandelion Salad

  2. Pingback: Abby Martin: A Guide to US Empire in Africa – Dandelion Salad

  3. Pingback: Abby Martin: US Kisses Saudi Crown + Taliban’s Tet Offensive – Dandelion Salad

  4. Pingback: Abby Martin: Biden’s First Act Of War Hits 3 Countries – Dandelion Salad

  5. Pingback: Abby Martin: Biden Sells Missiles to Fascists + US Base Destroys Ancient Coral Reef + Haiti’s Century of US Coups, Invasions and Puppets – Dandelion Salad

  6. Pingback: Chris Hedges: Biden Will Shut Down Left Voices + Will Americans Rise Up? – Dandelion Salad

  7. Pingback: 10 Key Points to Ending Wars in Yemen and Afghanistan, by David Swanson – Dandelion Salad

  8. Nice analysis of Biden’s words. But do words still provide the truth, even if coded? Or is this a way to provide an out if some party thought he said something substantive? In other words, why dance around the truth when you can simply lie? What does Biden gain with parsing his language?

Please add to the conversation.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s