Updated: May 16, 2009 added video
By David Kravets
http://www.wired.com
May 7, 2009
Sanchez, with the introduction of the Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act, clearly has a great interest in censoring.
Still, the Democrat from Los Angeles makes several valid points that cyberbullying has lasting consequences on our nation’s youth. The 13-year-old Meier’s suicide is clearly a tragedy. But how she characterizes the measure is simply untrue.
“Put simply, this legislation would be used as a tool for a judge and jury to determine whether there is significant evidence to prove that a person ‘cyberbullied’ another,” she wrote in the Huffington Post. “That is: did they have the required intent, did they use electronic means of communication, and was the communication severe, hostile, and repeated? So — bloggers, e-mailers, texters, spiteful exes and those who have blogged against this bill have no fear — your words are still protected under the same American values.”
[…]
via Lawmaker Defends Imprisoning Hostile Bloggers | Threat Level
***
Prison Awaiting Hostile Bloggers
By David Kravets
http://www.wired.com
May 5, 2009
Proposed congressional legislation would demand up to two years in prison for those whose electronic speech is meant to “coerce, intimidate, harass, or cause substantial emotional distress to a person.”
Instead of prison, perhaps we should say gulag.
The proposal by Rep. Linda Sanchez, D-Los Angeles, would never pass First Amendment muster, unless the U.S. Constitution was altered without us knowing. So Sanchez, and the 14 other lawmakers who signed on to the proposal, are grandstanding to show the public they care about children and are opposed to cyberbullying.
[…]
***
Updated
Warning, H.R. 1966 will put about 40% of you in jail Freedom of Speech will be taken away
theBigStinkGuide
Nov 8, 2009
see
Pingback: The Hate Crimes Bill: How Not to Remember Matthew Shepard By Alexander Cockburn « Dandelion Salad
Pingback: America’s Nightmare: The Obama Dystopia Manipulation, propaganda, imagery & PR wizardry by Andrew Hughes « Dandelion Salad
Shane,
Because Ms. Sanchez has connections with those whom have agenda’s, and the BIG money to move the agenda’s forward. ?
Does Ms. Sanchez have any “PRISON[people] for PROFIT” stock? ?
How do idjits like sanchez, who obviously has never read the constitution which she has taken an oath to uphold, ever get elected?