by

CSIS report: Turkey would be the optimum route for a possible Israeli attack on Iran

Propaganda Alert

compiled by Cem Ertür
Featured Writer
Dandelion Salad
21 March, 2009

1) Study on a possible Israeli strike on Iran’s nuclear development facilities
2) Iranian Weapons of Mass Destruction: Strategic and warfighting implications of a nuclear armed Iran (January 2009)
3) Meeting the challenge: US policy toward Iranian nuclear development (September 2008)

Israeli strike against Iranian nuclear facilities - Possible strike routes

___________________

http://www.csis.org/component/option,com_csis_pubs/task,view/id,5337/type,1/

excerpts from:

Study on a possible Israeli strike on Iran’s nuclear development facilities

by Abdullah Toukan, Anthony H.Cordesman and Arleigh A. Burke
Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), 16 March 2009

A military strike by Israel against Iranian Nuclear Facilities is possible and the optimum route would be along the Syrian-Turkish border then over a small portion of Iraq then into Iran, and back the same route. […]

If the Israeli aircraft do actually fly over Turkey that would constitute a clear Turkish – Israel and even U.S. conspiracy to attack Iran, so the Political risks could be high with Turkey.

Operationally, the risk from Syria would be low, whereas the risk from Turkey could be of medium level if Turkey deems it necessary to react militarily. […]

Risk assessment - The Northern Route
___________________

from the archives:

http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/090112_iran_wmd_policy.pdf

excerpts from:

Iranian Weapons of Mass Destruction: Strategic and warfighting implications of a nuclear armed Iran

by Anthony H. Cordesman, Arleigh A. Burke and Adam C. Seitz

Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), 21 January 2009

The shortest flight routes would be around 1,500-1,700 kilometers through Jordan and Iraq, 1,900-2,100 kilometers through Saudi Arabia, and 2,600-2,800 kilometers in a loop through Turkey […] The IAF would have problems in penetrating through Arab air space unless it could stage through Turkey, […]

Israel and Iran’s neighbors do not have the capability to launch more than limited strikes. It might be militarily possible for the United States to carry out effective initial strikes, follow them up with [extended restrikes over time]. […]

This kind of US posture, however, would pose major political challenges in terms of both the willingness of friendly powers like the Gulf States and Turkey to support any phase of such operations, and it is clear that the United States would have major problems in obtaining broad international support. […]

Iran would almost certainly see Jordanian, Turkish, and/or Saudi tolerance of such an IAF strike as a hostile act. […] The countries overflown would be confronted with the need to either react or have limited credibility in claiming surprise. […]

Turkey and Pakistan are strongly enough to deter Iranian conventional and asymmetric attacks, but Iraq, Afghanistan, and the southern Gulf States are not. […]

___________________

from the archives:

http://www.bipartisanpolicy.org/ht/a/GetDocumentAction/i/8448

excerpts from:

Meeting the challenge: US policy toward Iranian nuclear development

by Senators Daniel Coats and Charles Robb; Michael Makovsky

Bipartisan Policy Center, September 2008

The objective would be to enable U.S. military as broad access as possible to Iran from all directions. […]

Israeli bombers cannot traverse Saudi Arabia, the Persian Gulf, and Iraq without detection and, perhaps, engagement.

It is possible that Turkey would allow Israeli fighters to traverse its airspace, but because all of the fighters would need to enter Iran from the same direction, the pilots would be exposed.

see

Turkey Hosts NATO military exercise (13-30 March)

Iran sought Turkey’s help to mend links with US, says Erdogan (updated)

16 thoughts on “CSIS report: Turkey would be the optimum route for a possible Israeli attack on Iran”

  1. Pingback: Once again, a CSIS report designates Turkey as the optimum route for a possible Israeli attack on Iran « Dandelion Salad

  2. Pingback: Clinton to Lebanon: US cannot prevent Israel from attacking Lebanon if Hizbullah continues to arm itself « Dandelion Salad

  3. Pingback: Israeli army chief visits Turkey to hold talks on Iran’s nuclear program « Dandelion Salad

  4. Pingback: Israeli minister to Turkey: Iran’s nuclear programme would pose a danger for the whole world « Dandelion Salad

  5. Pingback: Turkey detains 6 suspects for 2003 Istanbul bombings « Dandelion Salad

  6. Pingback: Ahmadinejad: Some neighbouring countries are at the service of Zionism in the name of Islam « Dandelion Salad

  7. Pingback: Israeli general: Israel-Lebanon border could explode at any minute « Dandelion Salad

  8. Pingback: Biden: US won’t stop Israel attack on Iran + transcript « Dandelion Salad

  9. Pingback: Israeli ambassador to US: Iranian nuke could wipe off Israel in seconds « Dandelion Salad

  10. Pingback: Saddam told FBI he pretended to have nukes to deter Iran « Dandelion Salad

  11. Pingback: Netanyahu: 75% of the Iranians want regime change « Dandelion Salad

  12. Pingback: US Ambassador: Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons is a great danger to Turkey « Dandelion Salad

  13. Pingback: Obama & Merkel visit Buchenwald concentration camp: We will do everything we can so that something like this never happens again « Dandelion Salad

  14. Pingback: Obama: Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missile activity poses a real threat to its neighbors « Dandelion Salad

  15. The two nuclear threats in the Middle East are Israel and the US. Israel is a non-signatory to the non-proliferation treaty. Israel and the US need to stop obsessing over Iran. Iran has not attacked another country for something like 500 years. Neither the US nor Israel can make this claim.

Comments are closed.