#NDAA 2015 Passes In House of Representatives + It Allows Obama To Expand War Against ISIS

Dandelion Salad

Witness Against Torture: National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) Cements Indefinite Detention

Image by Justin Norman via Flickr

Act of Faith? Congressmen admit to not reading NDAA before voting

RT on Dec 6, 2014

US House members admitted they had not read the entire $585 billion, 1,648-page National Defense Authorization Act, which predominantly specifies budgeting for the Defense Department, before it was voted on Thursday in Congress.


H.R. 3979 – Senate Amendment
National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2015



Bill Summary


National Defense Related Provisions:
The Senate Amendment to H.R. 3979 authorizes and prioritizes funding for the Department of Defense (DoD) and other select national security programs within the Department of Energy for FY 2014. The bill authorizes a $520.5 billion topline for base national defense programs, which includes $7.1 billion in mandatory defense spending and $513.4 billion in discretionary spending. Additionally, the bill authorizes $63.7 billion for Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO).  The Senate Amendment to H.R. 3979 is consistent with the House budget, H.Con.Res. 96, which passed with 219 Republican votes on April 10, 2014.  The topline for national defense spending is $48 billion less than the enacted level in the FY 2015 NDAA.  The bill reflects the $22 billion in partial sequester relief that was enacted in the Ryan-Murray bipartisan budget agreement.


via http://www.gop.gov/bill/senate-amendment-to-h-r-3979-national-defense-authorization-act-for-fy-2015/


Rep. Gabbard Speaks on NDAA Provision to Allow Training, Equipping “Moderate” Syrian Rebels

Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard on Dec 4, 2014

Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard (HI-02) today voted against the House-Senate compromise for the National Defense Authorization Act of 2015 (NDAA), citing serious concerns about the inclusion of a provision to train and equip so-called moderate Syrian rebels for the next two years without debate.


Rep. Tulsi Gabbard Joins Bipartisan Call for Debate on Troubling Syria Provisions Buried in Defense Authorization Bill

Press Release
Dec. 4, 2014

Washington, DC – Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard (HI-02) has joined a group of bipartisan colleagues to call attention to significant policy provisions that were inserted into the National Defense Authorization Act of 2015 (NDAA) without a vote or serious debate. The annual defense bill will come to the House floor for approval today, and includes a two-year extension of the authority to equip and train so-called moderate Syrian rebels.

“It is absolutely unacceptable to include an open-ended policy of arming and training so-called ‘moderate’ Syrian rebels in the NDAA without any serious public debate or a standalone vote,” said Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, a twice-deployed veteran who has repeatedly criticized the strategy to arm Syrian rebels. “Giving weapons and training to these rebels whose stated purpose is to overthrow President Assad will have lengthy and costly consequences because it continues the broken policy of overthrowing regimes and nation-building that has cost so many precious lives and our nation’s treasure, drawing us into another country’s civil war. I voted against this provision on September 17, when the Administration promised Congress would be able to reassess this strategy in December 2014. To the contrary, Congress has had no opportunity to discuss, debate, or vote on this standalone question. There is no reason to bury this issue in a major must-pass annual defense bill that includes critical provisions for our military’s readiness and our troops’ well-being. We must have a standalone vote so the American people’s voice can be heard.

“Congress cannot continue to offer tacit support for a strategy that does not support achieving our mission of destroying ISIL and the Islamic extremists who seek to harm us. By continuing to funnel weapons to rebels in Syria, whose vetting and loyalties are questionable and untested, we face the likely outcome of our weapons falling into the hands of our enemies yet again, to be used against Americans and innocent civilians.”

Congresswoman Gabbard joined a bipartisan letter led by Congressman Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) to Speaker John Boehner reiterating these concerns about the Syria train and equip provisions inserted into the NDAA agreement.

Full text of the bipartisan letter is available below: […]


Frankel Statement on Vote Against the Defense Bill

Press Release
Dec 4, 2014

Washington, D.C. – Congresswoman Lois Frankel (FL-22) issued the following statement today after voting against the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).

“While the NDAA has many important provisions that I support, I cannot in good conscience vote for this bill because of the failure of Congress to take up and debate the authority of the President to conduct a war in Iraq and Syria,” said Frankel. “It is a disgrace that we are sending our children into harms way and spending billions of dollars without having a debate about whether and to what extent we should be involved in this war.”

Every year, Congress must pass a defense bill, the NDAA, to fund all military-related activities. The 2015 NDAA allows $513.4 billion in funding for Department of Defense. Among its many parts, the NDAA gives President Obama the authority to expand U.S. military operations against the terrorist group ISIL in Iraq and Syria. It also provides continued funding to train and equip Syrian rebels, which would otherwise expire on December 11.

In September, Frankel voted against training these Syrian rebels because the legislation did not allow for a debate on the full scale and scope of U.S. involvement in Iraq and Syria. Congress still has not held that debate.

Since August, the U.S. has conducted more than 1,700 airstrikes in Iraq and Syria. The Administration is carrying out these activities under congressionally approved authority as a result of the attacks of September 11, 2001. The President has indicated that the campaign to combat ISIL will take years and has said there are situations that could require the deployment of U.S. ground forces. Frankel believes Congress has an obligation to debate a new authorization in the fight against ISIL in Iraq and Syria.

see also:

Congressmen admit to not reading NDAA before voting for it: ‘I trust the leadership’

FACT SHEET: Highlights of the NDAA. H.R. 4435 National Defense Authorization Act For Fiscal Year 2015 (12 pages; pdf file)

National Defense Authorization Act for 2015 (pdf file)

http://votecruncher.com/rollcalls/house/113-congress/2014/december/4/roll-no-551 (Great statistics on who voted for and voted against)


Chris Hedges: Defending Our Civil Liberties (#NDAA)

Chris Hedges and Loretta Napoleoni: The Islamic State and the Crisis in US Foreign Policy

Chris Hedges: We’ve Decapitated More Civilians Than ISIS Ever Has (Updated Dec. 3, 2014)

Noam Chomsky: The Origins of ISIS + Sibel Edmonds: US Cultivated, Financed ISIS

from the archives:

Pres. Barack Obama Signs H.R. 3304, #NDAA for 2014 + Ratner: Gitmo: 12 Years of US War Crimes

Statement by the President on H.R. 4310 + Obama Signs NDAA 2013 + Kucinich: Indefinite Detention Part of Push to Shred Constitution

Barack Obama signs H.R. 1540, NDAA into law (NDAA for 2012)

20 thoughts on “#NDAA 2015 Passes In House of Representatives + It Allows Obama To Expand War Against ISIS

  1. Pingback: David Remes: Why the Senate Torture Report Doesn’t Matter + Redacted: What does the CIA #torturereport leave out? | Dandelion Salad

  2. Pingback: Local Syria ceasefires: The way out of a US policy dead end? by Gareth Porter | Dandelion Salad

  3. Pingback: Edward Snowden on CIA #TortureReport: US Committed Inexcusable Crimes + Mark Udall: Torture Didn’t Keep Us Safer At All + The CIA And The U.S President by Clive Hambidge | Dandelion Salad

  4. Pingback: Elizabeth Warren Could Use Some Elizabeth Peacen by David Swanson + Bernie Sanders Says No to Bloated Defense Budget | Dandelion Salad

  5. Pingback: David Remes: Why the Senate Torture Report Doesn’t Matter + Redacted: What does the CIA torture report leave out? | Dandelion Salad

  6. Pingback: Chris Hedges: We’ve Decapitated More Civilians Than ISIS Ever Has | Dandelion Salad

  7. Interesting that these members of Congress are both women. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii said “It is absolutely unacceptable…” Lois Frankel of Florida said “… because of the failure of Congress to take up and debate the authority of the President to conduct war in Iraq and Syria” and “It is a disgrace…” Perhaps inclusion of the word “unconstitutional” would have resulted in their statements’ traveling nearer to total accuracy, and thereby bring about acknowledgement of the mandatory fact necessitating constitutional debate.

    • Thanks, Jerry. Yes, I also noticed that it was 2 women. While searching for those who opposed the bill, I did find 2 other women who spoke in support of the bill in the House of Representatives. Of course, no one actually read it as it’s too long.

      Yes, I agree with you that both women who opposed the bill should have included “unconstitutional” as it is unconstitutional.

  8. This is shocking, disgusting, saddening. Regarding trusting leadership… Leadership needs its inner circle to act as Devil’s Advocates, at the very least, so that a line of thought may be examined for flaws and weaknesses. (And of course, they would need time to digest the topic in order to make meaningful critiques.)

  9. So many billions of dollars wasted, who has time to read these bills, but the outcome is always the same death, destruction of American personnel, and destruction for the planet, its time our leaders got a real job and made a pledge to do something useful, like plumbing.

    • Great points, Don.

      It’s obscene. The amount of money spent on destruction is incredible.

      Our society and those of the entire world could be so much better without the billions spent on the war machine.

      The NDAA is a bill that is always passed and always has additional riders/amendments that could not be passed otherwise. It’s a scam on the American people and the world since they are the ones targeted for destruction. Again, it’s obscene.

      Oh, and another thing, most Americans have never even heard of the NDAA. The corporate media mentions it only in passing.

      • dandelionsalad: Absolutely correct!

        Last paragraph: “Keep em’ dumb” and they’ll never rebel against injustice.

      • I have given the benefit of the doubt as to the moral fibre of plumbers, I say this just in case a plumber is plumbing the depths of discursive thought with regard to our discussion, with reference to the town I live in, I would say non can be trusted? I feel I am sticking my neck out on this one, but I think it doubtful the plumbers here, will be surveying this site.
        The important point is, the corruption of the world leaders pro war, is as far as plumbers go, the collateral damage will be relatively minimal in comparison to war damage.

Comments are closed.